每日GnRH激动剂对GnRH激动剂触发ICSI周期后黄体期支持的疗效与传统策略:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.9
Saghar Salehpour, Leila Nazari, Sedighe Hosseini, Elham Azizi, Nasrin Borumandnia, Teibeh Hashemi
{"title":"每日GnRH激动剂对GnRH激动剂触发ICSI周期后黄体期支持的疗效与传统策略:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Saghar Salehpour,&nbsp;Leila Nazari,&nbsp;Sedighe Hosseini,&nbsp;Elham Azizi,&nbsp;Nasrin Borumandnia,&nbsp;Teibeh Hashemi","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20200077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) as an alternative for human chronic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger has potential benefits, but the optimal luteal phase support (LPS) following GnRHa trigger remains to be elucidated. We aimed to investigate a new strategy (daily GnRH agonist for LPS following GnRH agonist trigger) as an alternative for the conventional approach to the patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial study, 44 ICSI patients were randomly assigned into two groups: group 1, patients received standard strategy (hCG trigger [10000 IU] and progesterone bid [400 mg/BD] for LPS); group 2, patients received a dose of GnRHa (0.2 mg) for ovulation trigger and subcutaneous injection of GnRHa bid (0.2 mg) for LPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for the patients undergoing LPS following the GnRHa trigger were similar to those of patients undergoing the standard strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We showed that a daily subcutaneous injection of GnRHa for LPS following the GnRHa trigger can be successfully performed as an alternative to the standard strategy, with comparable pregnancy and live birth rates in ICSI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"368-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/c6/jbra-25-03-0368.PMC8312295.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of daily GnRH agonist for luteal phase support following GnRH agonist triggered ICSI cycles versus conventional strategy: A Randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Saghar Salehpour,&nbsp;Leila Nazari,&nbsp;Sedighe Hosseini,&nbsp;Elham Azizi,&nbsp;Nasrin Borumandnia,&nbsp;Teibeh Hashemi\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20200077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) as an alternative for human chronic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger has potential benefits, but the optimal luteal phase support (LPS) following GnRHa trigger remains to be elucidated. We aimed to investigate a new strategy (daily GnRH agonist for LPS following GnRH agonist trigger) as an alternative for the conventional approach to the patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial study, 44 ICSI patients were randomly assigned into two groups: group 1, patients received standard strategy (hCG trigger [10000 IU] and progesterone bid [400 mg/BD] for LPS); group 2, patients received a dose of GnRHa (0.2 mg) for ovulation trigger and subcutaneous injection of GnRHa bid (0.2 mg) for LPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for the patients undergoing LPS following the GnRHa trigger were similar to those of patients undergoing the standard strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We showed that a daily subcutaneous injection of GnRHa for LPS following the GnRHa trigger can be successfully performed as an alternative to the standard strategy, with comparable pregnancy and live birth rates in ICSI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBRA assisted reproduction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"368-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/c6/jbra-25-03-0368.PMC8312295.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBRA assisted reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)作为人类慢性促性腺激素(hCG)触发器的替代品具有潜在的益处,但GnRHa触发后的最佳黄体期支持(LPS)仍有待阐明。我们的目的是研究一种新的策略(在GnRH激动剂触发后每天使用GnRH激动剂治疗LPS),作为常规方法的替代方法,用于接受胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的患者。方法:本随机对照试验研究将44例ICSI患者随机分为两组:1组患者采用标准策略(hCG触发[10000 IU]和黄体酮bid [400 mg/BD]用于LPS);2组患者给予GnRHa (0.2 mg)用于促排卵,皮下注射GnRHa bid (0.2 mg)用于LPS。结果:在GnRHa触发后接受LPS治疗的患者的妊娠、流产和活产率与接受标准策略的患者相似。结论:我们发现,在GnRHa触发后,每天皮下注射GnRHa用于LPS可以成功地作为标准策略的替代方案,在ICSI患者中具有相当的妊娠率和活产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of daily GnRH agonist for luteal phase support following GnRH agonist triggered ICSI cycles versus conventional strategy: A Randomized controlled trial.

Objective: The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) as an alternative for human chronic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger has potential benefits, but the optimal luteal phase support (LPS) following GnRHa trigger remains to be elucidated. We aimed to investigate a new strategy (daily GnRH agonist for LPS following GnRH agonist trigger) as an alternative for the conventional approach to the patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial study, 44 ICSI patients were randomly assigned into two groups: group 1, patients received standard strategy (hCG trigger [10000 IU] and progesterone bid [400 mg/BD] for LPS); group 2, patients received a dose of GnRHa (0.2 mg) for ovulation trigger and subcutaneous injection of GnRHa bid (0.2 mg) for LPS.

Results: The pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for the patients undergoing LPS following the GnRHa trigger were similar to those of patients undergoing the standard strategy.

Conclusions: We showed that a daily subcutaneous injection of GnRHa for LPS following the GnRHa trigger can be successfully performed as an alternative to the standard strategy, with comparable pregnancy and live birth rates in ICSI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信