在美国,每天五种水果和蔬菜并不能反映肥胖的上升趋势

Yilin Yoshida, Chester L Schmaltz, Jeannette Jackson-Thompson, Adam Bouras, Esmaeel Rahmani, Eduardo J Simoes
{"title":"在美国,每天五种水果和蔬菜并不能反映肥胖的上升趋势","authors":"Yilin Yoshida,&nbsp;Chester L Schmaltz,&nbsp;Jeannette Jackson-Thompson,&nbsp;Adam Bouras,&nbsp;Esmaeel Rahmani,&nbsp;Eduardo J Simoes","doi":"10.23937/2572-3278.1510038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After almost three decades of U.S. surveillance in fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake and obesity, it is important to evaluate their usefulness for monitoring prevention and health promotion efforts in public health. We used U.S. surveillance data to evaluate whether the 16-year trends of F&V intake, measured by the prevalence of eating five or more servings of fruits and vegetables a day (FV5/day) is related to obesity trend as measured by its prevalence in the same period. We also evaluated whether trends in the prevalence of FV5/day by important sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, etc.) could explain the findings.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A secondary analysis of U.S. adults (≥ 18 years) from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (1994-2009).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We categorized survey subjects for their F&V intake derived from the BRFSS six-question food frequency questionnaire into two groups: < FV5/day vs. ≥ FV5/day. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30. We used logistic regressions to compute predicted prevalence of FV5/day and obesity, and to estimate the odds ratio of FV5/day by obesity and levels of sociodemographic, stratified by year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1994 and 2009, the prevalence of FV5/day hovered around 25% among U.S. adults, while the obesity prevalence steadily increased from 14.8% to 27.4%. As measured through odds ratio, an inverse association between FV5/day and obesity was only observed in 55+, but not in other age, racial/ethnic or education groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Between 1994 and 2009, we could not confirm a decrease in the prevalence of FV5/day associated with an increase in obesity prevalence, except for age 55+ group. Known disparities in FV5/day and obesity across sociodemographic factors persisted over the study period. FV5/day may be an inappropriate measure of total calories derived from eating fruits and vegetables. Its use to measure impact of public health strategies to improve nutrition and prevent obesity may be questionable.</p>","PeriodicalId":91758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutritional medicine and diet care","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five Fruit and Vegetable a Day Does Not Reflect the Upward Trend of Obesity in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Yilin Yoshida,&nbsp;Chester L Schmaltz,&nbsp;Jeannette Jackson-Thompson,&nbsp;Adam Bouras,&nbsp;Esmaeel Rahmani,&nbsp;Eduardo J Simoes\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2572-3278.1510038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After almost three decades of U.S. surveillance in fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake and obesity, it is important to evaluate their usefulness for monitoring prevention and health promotion efforts in public health. We used U.S. surveillance data to evaluate whether the 16-year trends of F&V intake, measured by the prevalence of eating five or more servings of fruits and vegetables a day (FV5/day) is related to obesity trend as measured by its prevalence in the same period. We also evaluated whether trends in the prevalence of FV5/day by important sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, etc.) could explain the findings.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A secondary analysis of U.S. adults (≥ 18 years) from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (1994-2009).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We categorized survey subjects for their F&V intake derived from the BRFSS six-question food frequency questionnaire into two groups: < FV5/day vs. ≥ FV5/day. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30. We used logistic regressions to compute predicted prevalence of FV5/day and obesity, and to estimate the odds ratio of FV5/day by obesity and levels of sociodemographic, stratified by year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1994 and 2009, the prevalence of FV5/day hovered around 25% among U.S. adults, while the obesity prevalence steadily increased from 14.8% to 27.4%. As measured through odds ratio, an inverse association between FV5/day and obesity was only observed in 55+, but not in other age, racial/ethnic or education groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Between 1994 and 2009, we could not confirm a decrease in the prevalence of FV5/day associated with an increase in obesity prevalence, except for age 55+ group. Known disparities in FV5/day and obesity across sociodemographic factors persisted over the study period. FV5/day may be an inappropriate measure of total calories derived from eating fruits and vegetables. Its use to measure impact of public health strategies to improve nutrition and prevent obesity may be questionable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nutritional medicine and diet care\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nutritional medicine and diet care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3278.1510038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutritional medicine and diet care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3278.1510038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在美国对水果和蔬菜(F&V)摄入和肥胖进行了近三十年的监测后,评估它们在公共卫生监测预防和健康促进工作中的有用性是很重要的。我们使用美国的监测数据来评估16年F&V摄入量的趋势,通过每天吃五份或更多的水果和蔬菜(FV5/天)的流行程度来衡量,是否与同期肥胖趋势有关。我们还评估了重要的社会人口因素(年龄、种族/民族等)是否可以解释每天FV5的流行趋势。研究设计:对行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)(1994-2009)中美国成年人(≥18岁)进行二次分析。方法:我们根据BRFSS六题食物频率问卷的食物和酒精摄入量将调查对象分为两组:< FV5/天和≥FV5/天。BMI≥30定义为肥胖。我们使用逻辑回归计算预测的FV5/day患病率和肥胖,并估计FV5/day与肥胖和社会人口水平的比值比,按年分层。结果:1994年至2009年间,美国成年人每天FV5的患病率徘徊在25%左右,而肥胖患病率则从14.8%稳步上升到27.4%。通过比值比测量,FV5/day与肥胖之间的负相关仅在55岁以上人群中观察到,而在其他年龄,种族/民族或教育群体中没有观察到。结论:1994年至2009年间,除了55岁以上人群外,我们无法证实FV5/天患病率的下降与肥胖患病率的增加有关。已知的FV5/天和肥胖的社会人口因素差异在研究期间持续存在。每天FV5可能是食用水果和蔬菜所产生的总热量的一个不合适的度量。用它来衡量改善营养和预防肥胖的公共卫生战略的影响可能值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Five Fruit and Vegetable a Day Does Not Reflect the Upward Trend of Obesity in the U.S.

Five Fruit and Vegetable a Day Does Not Reflect the Upward Trend of Obesity in the U.S.

Five Fruit and Vegetable a Day Does Not Reflect the Upward Trend of Obesity in the U.S.

Five Fruit and Vegetable a Day Does Not Reflect the Upward Trend of Obesity in the U.S.

Objective: After almost three decades of U.S. surveillance in fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake and obesity, it is important to evaluate their usefulness for monitoring prevention and health promotion efforts in public health. We used U.S. surveillance data to evaluate whether the 16-year trends of F&V intake, measured by the prevalence of eating five or more servings of fruits and vegetables a day (FV5/day) is related to obesity trend as measured by its prevalence in the same period. We also evaluated whether trends in the prevalence of FV5/day by important sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, etc.) could explain the findings.

Study design: A secondary analysis of U.S. adults (≥ 18 years) from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (1994-2009).

Methods: We categorized survey subjects for their F&V intake derived from the BRFSS six-question food frequency questionnaire into two groups: < FV5/day vs. ≥ FV5/day. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30. We used logistic regressions to compute predicted prevalence of FV5/day and obesity, and to estimate the odds ratio of FV5/day by obesity and levels of sociodemographic, stratified by year.

Results: Between 1994 and 2009, the prevalence of FV5/day hovered around 25% among U.S. adults, while the obesity prevalence steadily increased from 14.8% to 27.4%. As measured through odds ratio, an inverse association between FV5/day and obesity was only observed in 55+, but not in other age, racial/ethnic or education groups.

Conclusions: Between 1994 and 2009, we could not confirm a decrease in the prevalence of FV5/day associated with an increase in obesity prevalence, except for age 55+ group. Known disparities in FV5/day and obesity across sociodemographic factors persisted over the study period. FV5/day may be an inappropriate measure of total calories derived from eating fruits and vegetables. Its use to measure impact of public health strategies to improve nutrition and prevent obesity may be questionable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信