{"title":"用x射线显微断层扫描定量注射注射器输送的复合树脂的孔隙度。","authors":"Bo Wold Nilsen, Mathieu Mouhat, Asbjørn Jokstad","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1784013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether composite polymer resin delivered in compules include pores and the possible effect on the amount of porosity in dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Original compules containing unpolymerised composite polymer resin (CPR) were scanned in a micro-CT. Four products were examined, which comprised universal composites (Herculite XRV Ultra, Ceram.X Universal, Tetric Evo Ceram) and a flowable bulk-fill composite (SDR) (<i>n</i> = 10 per group). The pore size distribution and amount of porosity (vol.%) were estimated for the unpolymerized and polymerized material used to restore a standardised cavity in a typodont tooth. Manufacturers' instructions were followed regarding material handling, and polymerisation by use of a calibrated light-curing unit. The pore characteristics and their size distribution, and the amount of porosity in the dental restoration were contrasted with the values measured in the compule. Non-parametric tests were used to analyse differences between the four products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the composite polymer resin compules contained unpolymerised material that included pores. The universal composite compules included pores predominantly in the sub-100 µm sizes. In contrast, the flowable bulk-fill compules included a few pores with a diameter >100 µm, which were assumed to be air-bubbles. The unpolymerised material within the compule included consistently more pores compared to the extruded portion from the compule tip, and in the final restoration (<i>p</i> < .001). The amount of porosity in the restorations differed amongst the tested materials, with the flowable bulk-fill composite showing the lowest amount of porosity (<i>p</i> < .01).</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"86-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1784013","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of porosity in composite resins delivered by injectable syringes using X-ray microtomography.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wold Nilsen, Mathieu Mouhat, Asbjørn Jokstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26415275.2020.1784013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether composite polymer resin delivered in compules include pores and the possible effect on the amount of porosity in dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Original compules containing unpolymerised composite polymer resin (CPR) were scanned in a micro-CT. Four products were examined, which comprised universal composites (Herculite XRV Ultra, Ceram.X Universal, Tetric Evo Ceram) and a flowable bulk-fill composite (SDR) (<i>n</i> = 10 per group). The pore size distribution and amount of porosity (vol.%) were estimated for the unpolymerized and polymerized material used to restore a standardised cavity in a typodont tooth. Manufacturers' instructions were followed regarding material handling, and polymerisation by use of a calibrated light-curing unit. The pore characteristics and their size distribution, and the amount of porosity in the dental restoration were contrasted with the values measured in the compule. Non-parametric tests were used to analyse differences between the four products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the composite polymer resin compules contained unpolymerised material that included pores. The universal composite compules included pores predominantly in the sub-100 µm sizes. In contrast, the flowable bulk-fill compules included a few pores with a diameter >100 µm, which were assumed to be air-bubbles. The unpolymerised material within the compule included consistently more pores compared to the extruded portion from the compule tip, and in the final restoration (<i>p</i> < .001). The amount of porosity in the restorations differed amongst the tested materials, with the flowable bulk-fill composite showing the lowest amount of porosity (<i>p</i> < .01).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"86-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1784013\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1784013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1784013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
目的:探讨复合树脂在口腔修复体中是否含有孔隙及其对孔隙量的影响。方法和材料:在微ct上扫描含有未聚合复合聚合物树脂(CPR)的原始复合物。测试了四种产品,其中包括通用复合材料(Herculite XRV Ultra, Ceram。X Universal, Tetric Evo Ceram)和可流动填充复合材料(SDR)(每组n = 10)。对用于修复排印牙的标准化腔体的未聚合和聚合材料的孔径分布和孔隙率(体积%)进行了估计。遵循制造商关于材料处理的说明,以及使用校准的光固化装置进行聚合。牙体修复体的孔隙特征、孔隙大小分布及孔隙量与计算机测量值进行对比。采用非参数检验来分析四种产品之间的差异。结果:所有复合树脂均含有含孔隙的未聚合物质。通用复合材料主要包括100 μ m以下尺寸的孔隙。相比之下,可流动的块状充填体包含少数直径>100 μ m的孔隙,这些孔隙被认为是气泡。与计算机尖端的挤出部分相比,计算机内未聚合的材料始终包含更多的孔隙,并且在最终修复中(p . p .)
Quantification of porosity in composite resins delivered by injectable syringes using X-ray microtomography.
Objective: To assess whether composite polymer resin delivered in compules include pores and the possible effect on the amount of porosity in dental restorations.
Method and materials: Original compules containing unpolymerised composite polymer resin (CPR) were scanned in a micro-CT. Four products were examined, which comprised universal composites (Herculite XRV Ultra, Ceram.X Universal, Tetric Evo Ceram) and a flowable bulk-fill composite (SDR) (n = 10 per group). The pore size distribution and amount of porosity (vol.%) were estimated for the unpolymerized and polymerized material used to restore a standardised cavity in a typodont tooth. Manufacturers' instructions were followed regarding material handling, and polymerisation by use of a calibrated light-curing unit. The pore characteristics and their size distribution, and the amount of porosity in the dental restoration were contrasted with the values measured in the compule. Non-parametric tests were used to analyse differences between the four products.
Results: All the composite polymer resin compules contained unpolymerised material that included pores. The universal composite compules included pores predominantly in the sub-100 µm sizes. In contrast, the flowable bulk-fill compules included a few pores with a diameter >100 µm, which were assumed to be air-bubbles. The unpolymerised material within the compule included consistently more pores compared to the extruded portion from the compule tip, and in the final restoration (p < .001). The amount of porosity in the restorations differed amongst the tested materials, with the flowable bulk-fill composite showing the lowest amount of porosity (p < .01).