达托霉素和头孢他啶协同作用机制对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症感染患者的临床前影响

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jennyflore Eliazar, Tevin Johnson, Christiane Chbib
{"title":"达托霉素和头孢他啶协同作用机制对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症感染患者的临床前影响","authors":"Jennyflore Eliazar, Tevin Johnson, Christiane Chbib","doi":"10.2174/1574884715666210108103813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aims at assessing the pre-clinical impact of the synergistic mechanism of Daptomycin (DAP) and Ceftaroline (CFT) on patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia infections (MRSAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic overview was conducted by searching PubMed, Oxford academic, and Cochrane library up to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>All English- language clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case reports related to the synergistic drug therapy for MRSAB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the case of MRSAB infections, we examined two different in vitro studies that showed effective synergism with DAP and CFT. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) range observed for each is as follow: DAP 0.125-1 mg/L, CFT 0.38-1 mg/L, DAP + CFT 0.094-0.5 mg/L, vancomycin (VAN) 0.75-2 mg/L, VAN + CFT 0.25-2 mg/L. DAP + CFT combination displayed the most efficacy with the lowest MIC. The statistical analysis performed showed that DAP + CFT obtained significantly lower fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) values (0.941 ± 0.328) compared with VAN + CFT. In vitro activities of regimens tested on DAP non-susceptibility and VAN intermediate after 96 hours showed DAP 8.29 ± 0.03<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, VAN 6.82 ± 0.04<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/mL, CFT 4.63 ± 0.19<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, DAP + CFT 1.15 ± 0.20<sup>b</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, VAN + CFT 3.18 ± 0.49<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL. (<sup>a</sup> meaning significantly different than DAP plus CFT, P< equal to 0.001<sup>b</sup> meaning therapeutic enhancement combination was defined as ≥ 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml reduction over the most active single agent). Based on these results, although DAP was not susceptible, the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) for DAP and CFT had the best therapeutic results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In vitro studies have shown that a combination DAP and CFT is more efficacious than the combination of VAN and CFT in MRSA bacteremia infections. The synergic effects of DAP (bactericidal) and CFT (bactericidal) is statistically significant, in recent trials, warranting promising evidence for its use in complicated bacteremia infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"16 4","pages":"296-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-clinical Impact of the Synergistic Mechanism of Daptomycin and Ceftaroline on Patients with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Jennyflore Eliazar, Tevin Johnson, Christiane Chbib\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1574884715666210108103813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aims at assessing the pre-clinical impact of the synergistic mechanism of Daptomycin (DAP) and Ceftaroline (CFT) on patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia infections (MRSAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic overview was conducted by searching PubMed, Oxford academic, and Cochrane library up to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>All English- language clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case reports related to the synergistic drug therapy for MRSAB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the case of MRSAB infections, we examined two different in vitro studies that showed effective synergism with DAP and CFT. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) range observed for each is as follow: DAP 0.125-1 mg/L, CFT 0.38-1 mg/L, DAP + CFT 0.094-0.5 mg/L, vancomycin (VAN) 0.75-2 mg/L, VAN + CFT 0.25-2 mg/L. DAP + CFT combination displayed the most efficacy with the lowest MIC. The statistical analysis performed showed that DAP + CFT obtained significantly lower fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) values (0.941 ± 0.328) compared with VAN + CFT. In vitro activities of regimens tested on DAP non-susceptibility and VAN intermediate after 96 hours showed DAP 8.29 ± 0.03<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, VAN 6.82 ± 0.04<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/mL, CFT 4.63 ± 0.19<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, DAP + CFT 1.15 ± 0.20<sup>b</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, VAN + CFT 3.18 ± 0.49<sup>a</sup> log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL. (<sup>a</sup> meaning significantly different than DAP plus CFT, P< equal to 0.001<sup>b</sup> meaning therapeutic enhancement combination was defined as ≥ 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/ml reduction over the most active single agent). Based on these results, although DAP was not susceptible, the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) for DAP and CFT had the best therapeutic results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In vitro studies have shown that a combination DAP and CFT is more efficacious than the combination of VAN and CFT in MRSA bacteremia infections. The synergic effects of DAP (bactericidal) and CFT (bactericidal) is statistically significant, in recent trials, warranting promising evidence for its use in complicated bacteremia infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"296-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884715666210108103813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884715666210108103813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究背景我们的研究旨在评估达托霉素(DAP)和头孢他啶(CFT)的协同机制对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症感染(MRSAB)患者的临床前影响:通过检索PubMed、牛津学术期刊和Cochrane图书馆,对截至2020年6月的研究进行系统综述:所有与MRSAB协同药物治疗相关的英文临床试验、体外研究和病例报告:对于 MRSAB 感染,我们研究了两项不同的体外研究,结果显示 DAP 和 CFT 具有有效的协同作用。两种药物的最低抑制浓度(MIC)范围如下:DAP 0.125-1 mg/L,CFT 0.38-1 mg/L,DAP + CFT 0.094-0.5 mg/L,万古霉素(VAN)0.75-2 mg/L,VAN + CFT 0.25-2 mg/L。DAP + CFT 组合的疗效最好,MIC 最低。统计分析显示,与 VAN + CFT 相比,DAP + CFT 的分数抑制浓度 (FIC) 值(0.941 ± 0.328)明显较低。在 96 小时后,对 DAP 非敏感性和 VAN 中间体进行的方案体外活性测试显示,DAP 为 8.29 ± 0.03a log10 CFU/mL,VAN 为 6.82 ± 0.04a log10 菌落总数(CFU)/mL,CFT 为 4.63 ± 0.19a log10 CFU/mL,DAP + CFT 为 1.15 ± 0.20b log10 CFU/mL,VAN + CFT 为 3.18 ± 0.49a log10 CFU/mL。(a 表示与 DAP + CFT 相比有明显差异,P< 等于 0.001b 表示治疗增强组合的定义是比最有效的单药减少≥ 2 log10 CFU/ml)。基于这些结果,虽然 DAP 不敏感,但 DAP 和 CFT 的菌落形成单位(CFU)治疗效果最好:体外研究表明,在 MRSA 菌血症感染中,DAP 和 CFT 的组合比 VAN 和 CFT 的组合更有效。在最近的试验中,DAP(杀菌)和 CFT(杀菌)的协同作用具有显著的统计学意义,因此有望用于复杂菌血症感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-clinical Impact of the Synergistic Mechanism of Daptomycin and Ceftaroline on Patients with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Infections.

Background: Our study aims at assessing the pre-clinical impact of the synergistic mechanism of Daptomycin (DAP) and Ceftaroline (CFT) on patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia infections (MRSAB).

Methods: A systematic overview was conducted by searching PubMed, Oxford academic, and Cochrane library up to June 2020.

Study selection and data extraction: All English- language clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case reports related to the synergistic drug therapy for MRSAB.

Results: In the case of MRSAB infections, we examined two different in vitro studies that showed effective synergism with DAP and CFT. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) range observed for each is as follow: DAP 0.125-1 mg/L, CFT 0.38-1 mg/L, DAP + CFT 0.094-0.5 mg/L, vancomycin (VAN) 0.75-2 mg/L, VAN + CFT 0.25-2 mg/L. DAP + CFT combination displayed the most efficacy with the lowest MIC. The statistical analysis performed showed that DAP + CFT obtained significantly lower fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) values (0.941 ± 0.328) compared with VAN + CFT. In vitro activities of regimens tested on DAP non-susceptibility and VAN intermediate after 96 hours showed DAP 8.29 ± 0.03a log10 CFU/mL, VAN 6.82 ± 0.04a log10 Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/mL, CFT 4.63 ± 0.19a log10 CFU/mL, DAP + CFT 1.15 ± 0.20b log10 CFU/mL, VAN + CFT 3.18 ± 0.49a log10 CFU/mL. (a meaning significantly different than DAP plus CFT, P< equal to 0.001b meaning therapeutic enhancement combination was defined as ≥ 2 log10 CFU/ml reduction over the most active single agent). Based on these results, although DAP was not susceptible, the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) for DAP and CFT had the best therapeutic results.

Conclusion: In vitro studies have shown that a combination DAP and CFT is more efficacious than the combination of VAN and CFT in MRSA bacteremia infections. The synergic effects of DAP (bactericidal) and CFT (bactericidal) is statistically significant, in recent trials, warranting promising evidence for its use in complicated bacteremia infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信