Jia Han, Roger Adams, Gordon Waddington, Chunying Han
{"title":"针对头顶目标的单关节和多关节抬臂运动模式后本体感觉的准确性。","authors":"Jia Han, Roger Adams, Gordon Waddington, Chunying Han","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2021.1876017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effect of arm-raising pattern on upper limb proprioceptive accuracy for movements made to overhead targets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen healthy young adults were tested in standing with arms at the sides, made dominant arm-raising movements to an unseen overhead stop, randomly placed at one of five different overhead targets. Movements were made either as a uni-joint shoulder flexion movement in an arc, or as an unconstrained arm raising that was a series of multi-joint movements involving the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall proprioceptive accuracy for discrimination between the five unseen overhead targets was not different after arm-raising with either a uni-joint or mult-joint pattern (<i>F</i><sub>1, 15</sub> = 0.50, <i>p</i> = 0.49, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.03). Better performers with one pattern also tended to perform well with the other (<i>r</i> = 0.70, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Trend analysis across the 4 pairwise scores for discriminations between the target positions (171.8°-173.6°, 173.6°-175.4°, 175.4°-177.2°, and 177.2°-179.0°) showed worsening discrimination towards the more distant targets (<i>F</i><sub>1, 15</sub> = 8.44, <i>p</i> = 0.01, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.36). However, this linear trend of falling discrimination accuracy was not different between the two movement patterns (<i>p</i> = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proprioceptive accuracy did not differ between simple uni-joint and more complex multi-joint arm-raising movement patterns, and the further the extent of the overhead target movement, the worse proprioceptive discrimination sensitivity for both movement patterns. Upper limb proprioceptive accuracy was therefore movement extent dependent, but movement pattern independent.</p>","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":"38 2","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08990220.2021.1876017","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proprioceptive accuracy after uni-joint and multi-joint patterns of arm-raising movements directed to overhead targets.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Han, Roger Adams, Gordon Waddington, Chunying Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08990220.2021.1876017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effect of arm-raising pattern on upper limb proprioceptive accuracy for movements made to overhead targets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen healthy young adults were tested in standing with arms at the sides, made dominant arm-raising movements to an unseen overhead stop, randomly placed at one of five different overhead targets. Movements were made either as a uni-joint shoulder flexion movement in an arc, or as an unconstrained arm raising that was a series of multi-joint movements involving the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall proprioceptive accuracy for discrimination between the five unseen overhead targets was not different after arm-raising with either a uni-joint or mult-joint pattern (<i>F</i><sub>1, 15</sub> = 0.50, <i>p</i> = 0.49, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.03). Better performers with one pattern also tended to perform well with the other (<i>r</i> = 0.70, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Trend analysis across the 4 pairwise scores for discriminations between the target positions (171.8°-173.6°, 173.6°-175.4°, 175.4°-177.2°, and 177.2°-179.0°) showed worsening discrimination towards the more distant targets (<i>F</i><sub>1, 15</sub> = 8.44, <i>p</i> = 0.01, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.36). However, this linear trend of falling discrimination accuracy was not different between the two movement patterns (<i>p</i> = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proprioceptive accuracy did not differ between simple uni-joint and more complex multi-joint arm-raising movement patterns, and the further the extent of the overhead target movement, the worse proprioceptive discrimination sensitivity for both movement patterns. Upper limb proprioceptive accuracy was therefore movement extent dependent, but movement pattern independent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"127-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08990220.2021.1876017\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1876017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.1876017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:探讨抬臂方式对上肢对头顶目标运动本体感觉准确度的影响。材料和方法:对16名健康的年轻人进行了测试,他们站着,手臂放在身体两侧,做出主要的举臂动作,直到看不见的头顶停止,随机放置在五个不同的头顶目标之一。动作可以是单关节的弧形肩部屈曲运动,也可以是不受约束的手臂抬起,这是一系列涉及肩部、肘部和手腕的多关节运动。结果:无论是单关节还是多关节抬臂,抬臂后本体感觉对5个未见过的头顶目标的识别准确率均无显著差异(F1, 15 = 0.50, p = 0.49,部分误差2 = 0.03)。在一种模式下表现较好的人在另一种模式下也往往表现较好(r = 0.70, p = 0.003)。对目标位置(171.8°-173.6°、173.6°-175.4°、175.4°-177.2°和177.2°-179.0°)之间的4个成对得分进行趋势分析,结果表明,对距离较远的目标的歧视程度越高(F1, 15 = 8.44, p = 0.01,偏η2 = 0.36)。然而,这种线性趋势下降的识别精度在两种运动模式之间没有差异(p = 0.27)。结论:简单的单关节和复杂的多关节上臂动作模式的本体感觉识别准确率无显著差异,且头顶目标动作程度越深,两种动作模式的本体感觉识别灵敏度越差。因此,上肢本体感觉的准确性依赖于运动程度,而独立于运动模式。
Proprioceptive accuracy after uni-joint and multi-joint patterns of arm-raising movements directed to overhead targets.
Aim: To determine the effect of arm-raising pattern on upper limb proprioceptive accuracy for movements made to overhead targets.
Materials and methods: Sixteen healthy young adults were tested in standing with arms at the sides, made dominant arm-raising movements to an unseen overhead stop, randomly placed at one of five different overhead targets. Movements were made either as a uni-joint shoulder flexion movement in an arc, or as an unconstrained arm raising that was a series of multi-joint movements involving the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.
Results: Overall proprioceptive accuracy for discrimination between the five unseen overhead targets was not different after arm-raising with either a uni-joint or mult-joint pattern (F1, 15 = 0.50, p = 0.49, partial η2 = 0.03). Better performers with one pattern also tended to perform well with the other (r = 0.70, p = 0.003). Trend analysis across the 4 pairwise scores for discriminations between the target positions (171.8°-173.6°, 173.6°-175.4°, 175.4°-177.2°, and 177.2°-179.0°) showed worsening discrimination towards the more distant targets (F1, 15 = 8.44, p = 0.01, partial η2 = 0.36). However, this linear trend of falling discrimination accuracy was not different between the two movement patterns (p = 0.27).
Conclusion: Proprioceptive accuracy did not differ between simple uni-joint and more complex multi-joint arm-raising movement patterns, and the further the extent of the overhead target movement, the worse proprioceptive discrimination sensitivity for both movement patterns. Upper limb proprioceptive accuracy was therefore movement extent dependent, but movement pattern independent.
期刊介绍:
Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.