两种战术训练方法对习得战术和游戏中战术训练的评价。

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Analysis of Verbal Behavior Pub Date : 2020-09-11 eCollection Date: 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4
Kate B LaLonde, Ana D Dueñas, Nicole Neil, Addam Wawrzonek, Joshua B Plavnick
{"title":"两种战术训练方法对习得战术和游戏中战术训练的评价。","authors":"Kate B LaLonde,&nbsp;Ana D Dueñas,&nbsp;Nicole Neil,&nbsp;Addam Wawrzonek,&nbsp;Joshua B Plavnick","doi":"10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A common practice in tact training is to include a supplemental verbal stimulus (e.g., \"What is it?\") in addition to the presentation of a nonverbal discriminative stimulus. Previous literature has suggested that this supplemental verbal stimulus can impede acquisition and generalization relative to the presentation of the object alone, as it may establish faulty stimulus control or decrease spontaneous tacting. Research has yet to compare these 2 training methods on the generalization of learned tacts to more naturalistic, play-based environments. The present study evaluated the use of \"What is it?\" compared to the presentation of only the nonverbal discriminative stimulus on tact acquisition among 3 children with autism spectrum disorder and the extent to which these training procedures led to tacting in a play-based setting following discrete-trial training. Overall, participants learned to tact stimuli under both conditions, and all participants demonstrated generalization of tacts in a play-based setting. Recommendations for the development and evaluation of naturalistic posttraining assessment are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51684,"journal":{"name":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","volume":"36 2","pages":"180-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Two Tact-Training Procedures on Acquired Tacts and Tacting During Play.\",\"authors\":\"Kate B LaLonde,&nbsp;Ana D Dueñas,&nbsp;Nicole Neil,&nbsp;Addam Wawrzonek,&nbsp;Joshua B Plavnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A common practice in tact training is to include a supplemental verbal stimulus (e.g., \\\"What is it?\\\") in addition to the presentation of a nonverbal discriminative stimulus. Previous literature has suggested that this supplemental verbal stimulus can impede acquisition and generalization relative to the presentation of the object alone, as it may establish faulty stimulus control or decrease spontaneous tacting. Research has yet to compare these 2 training methods on the generalization of learned tacts to more naturalistic, play-based environments. The present study evaluated the use of \\\"What is it?\\\" compared to the presentation of only the nonverbal discriminative stimulus on tact acquisition among 3 children with autism spectrum disorder and the extent to which these training procedures led to tacting in a play-based setting following discrete-trial training. Overall, participants learned to tact stimuli under both conditions, and all participants demonstrated generalization of tacts in a play-based setting. Recommendations for the development and evaluation of naturalistic posttraining assessment are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analysis of Verbal Behavior\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"180-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analysis of Verbal Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-020-00131-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在机智训练中,一个常见的做法是除了提供非语言的歧视性刺激外,还包括一个补充的语言刺激(例如,“这是什么?”)。先前的文献表明,相对于单独呈现物体,这种补充的言语刺激可能会阻碍习得和泛化,因为它可能会建立错误的刺激控制或减少自发行为。研究还没有将这两种训练方法与更自然的、基于游戏的环境进行比较。本研究评估了在3名自闭症谱系障碍儿童中,使用"What isit ?"与只使用非语言区别性刺激进行技巧习得的比较,以及这些训练程序在离散试验训练后以游戏为基础的环境中对技巧习得的影响程度。总的来说,参与者在两种条件下都学会了机智刺激,所有参与者在基于游戏的环境中都表现出了机智的泛化。讨论了自然训练后评价的发展和评价建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Two Tact-Training Procedures on Acquired Tacts and Tacting During Play.

A common practice in tact training is to include a supplemental verbal stimulus (e.g., "What is it?") in addition to the presentation of a nonverbal discriminative stimulus. Previous literature has suggested that this supplemental verbal stimulus can impede acquisition and generalization relative to the presentation of the object alone, as it may establish faulty stimulus control or decrease spontaneous tacting. Research has yet to compare these 2 training methods on the generalization of learned tacts to more naturalistic, play-based environments. The present study evaluated the use of "What is it?" compared to the presentation of only the nonverbal discriminative stimulus on tact acquisition among 3 children with autism spectrum disorder and the extent to which these training procedures led to tacting in a play-based setting following discrete-trial training. Overall, participants learned to tact stimuli under both conditions, and all participants demonstrated generalization of tacts in a play-based setting. Recommendations for the development and evaluation of naturalistic posttraining assessment are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Analysis of Verbal Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (TAVB) is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International.  The Mission of the journal is to support the dissemination of innovative empirical research, theoretical conceptualizations, and real-world applications of the behavioral science of language. The journal embraces diverse perspectives of human language, its conceptual underpinnings, and the utility such diversity affords. TAVB values contributions that represent the scope of field and breadth of populations behavior analysts serve, and Is the premier publication outlet that fosters increased dialogue between scientists and scientist-practitioners.  Articles addressing the following topics are encouraged: language acquisition, verbal operants, relational frames, naming, rule-governed behavior, epistemology, language assessment and training, bilingualism, verbal behavior of nonhumans, research methodology, or any other topic that addresses the analysis of language from a behavior analytic perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信