含炭牙垢的体外磨耗性和化学性质。

Foteini Machla, Aida Mulic, Ellen Bruzell, Håkon Valen, Ida Sofia Refsholt Stenhagen
{"title":"含炭牙垢的体外磨耗性和化学性质。","authors":"Foteini Machla,&nbsp;Aida Mulic,&nbsp;Ellen Bruzell,&nbsp;Håkon Valen,&nbsp;Ida Sofia Refsholt Stenhagen","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2020.1838284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Charcoal-containing dentifrices are gaining popularity, but scientific information on their effect on oral health is scarce. This study investigated properties of dentifrices that may affect dentine abrasivity, as well as their ability to adsorb fluoride, their pH and the presence of harmful substances.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dentifrices NAO and COCO were subjected to the following analyses: abrasivity, expressed as mean abraded depth and relative dentin abrasivity (RDA), and surface roughness of extracted human molars (<i>n</i> = 30) after simulated brushing; fluoride adsorption measured as concentration change; pH measurements; detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The products were compared to a reference dentifrice (Colgate<sup>®</sup> MaxWhite), positive controls (ISO dentifrice slurry, activated charcoal for laboratory use) and a negative control (distilled water).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean abraded depths of NAO and COCO were not different (<i>p</i> > .05), but higher than the reference dentifrice and the negative control (<i>p</i> < .05). The RDA values of NAO, COCO and the ISO dentifrice slurry were higher than the reference dentifrice value (<i>p</i> < .05) by up to 10 times. The dentine surface roughness was higher after brushing with NAO, COCO and ISO dentifrice slurry compared to distilled water (<i>p</i> < .05). No change in mean adsorbed fluoride concentration was observed after 24 h (<i>p</i> > .05). Both NAO and COCO were alkaline (pH > 7). Analysis of NAO revealed the presence of naphthalene (112.8 ± 2.0 ng/mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The charcoal-containing dentifrices were abrasive within acceptable limits set by ISO and did not adsorb fluoride. The presence of naphthalene in one product is a cause for concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838284","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In vitro</i> abrasivity and chemical properties of charcoal-containing dentifrices.\",\"authors\":\"Foteini Machla,&nbsp;Aida Mulic,&nbsp;Ellen Bruzell,&nbsp;Håkon Valen,&nbsp;Ida Sofia Refsholt Stenhagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26415275.2020.1838284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Charcoal-containing dentifrices are gaining popularity, but scientific information on their effect on oral health is scarce. This study investigated properties of dentifrices that may affect dentine abrasivity, as well as their ability to adsorb fluoride, their pH and the presence of harmful substances.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dentifrices NAO and COCO were subjected to the following analyses: abrasivity, expressed as mean abraded depth and relative dentin abrasivity (RDA), and surface roughness of extracted human molars (<i>n</i> = 30) after simulated brushing; fluoride adsorption measured as concentration change; pH measurements; detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The products were compared to a reference dentifrice (Colgate<sup>®</sup> MaxWhite), positive controls (ISO dentifrice slurry, activated charcoal for laboratory use) and a negative control (distilled water).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean abraded depths of NAO and COCO were not different (<i>p</i> > .05), but higher than the reference dentifrice and the negative control (<i>p</i> < .05). The RDA values of NAO, COCO and the ISO dentifrice slurry were higher than the reference dentifrice value (<i>p</i> < .05) by up to 10 times. The dentine surface roughness was higher after brushing with NAO, COCO and ISO dentifrice slurry compared to distilled water (<i>p</i> < .05). No change in mean adsorbed fluoride concentration was observed after 24 h (<i>p</i> > .05). Both NAO and COCO were alkaline (pH > 7). Analysis of NAO revealed the presence of naphthalene (112.8 ± 2.0 ng/mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The charcoal-containing dentifrices were abrasive within acceptable limits set by ISO and did not adsorb fluoride. The presence of naphthalene in one product is a cause for concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838284\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.1838284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:含炭牙膏越来越受欢迎,但其对口腔健康影响的科学信息却很少。本研究调查了可能影响牙本质磨耗性的牙膏特性,以及它们对氟化物的吸附能力、pH值和有害物质的存在。材料和方法:对NAO和COCO牙体进行以下分析:磨耗性,用平均磨耗深度和相对牙本质磨耗性(RDA)表示,模拟刷牙后拔出的人磨牙(n = 30)的表面粗糙度;氟化物吸附量以浓度变化测量;pH值测量;气相色谱-质谱联用法检测多环芳烃。将产品与参考牙膏(高露洁®MaxWhite)、阳性对照(ISO牙膏浆、实验室用活性炭)和阴性对照(蒸馏水)进行比较。结果:NAO和COCO的平均磨损深度差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05),但均高于对照牙和阴性对照(p > 0.05)。NAO和COCO均呈碱性(pH > 7), NAO检测结果显示存在萘(112.8±2.0 ng/mL)。结论:含炭牙膏的磨蚀性在ISO规定的可接受范围内,不吸附氟。一种产品中萘的存在引起了人们的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

<i>In vitro</i> abrasivity and chemical properties of charcoal-containing dentifrices.

<i>In vitro</i> abrasivity and chemical properties of charcoal-containing dentifrices.

<i>In vitro</i> abrasivity and chemical properties of charcoal-containing dentifrices.

In vitro abrasivity and chemical properties of charcoal-containing dentifrices.

Objective: Charcoal-containing dentifrices are gaining popularity, but scientific information on their effect on oral health is scarce. This study investigated properties of dentifrices that may affect dentine abrasivity, as well as their ability to adsorb fluoride, their pH and the presence of harmful substances.

Materials and methods: The dentifrices NAO and COCO were subjected to the following analyses: abrasivity, expressed as mean abraded depth and relative dentin abrasivity (RDA), and surface roughness of extracted human molars (n = 30) after simulated brushing; fluoride adsorption measured as concentration change; pH measurements; detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The products were compared to a reference dentifrice (Colgate® MaxWhite), positive controls (ISO dentifrice slurry, activated charcoal for laboratory use) and a negative control (distilled water).

Results: The mean abraded depths of NAO and COCO were not different (p > .05), but higher than the reference dentifrice and the negative control (p < .05). The RDA values of NAO, COCO and the ISO dentifrice slurry were higher than the reference dentifrice value (p < .05) by up to 10 times. The dentine surface roughness was higher after brushing with NAO, COCO and ISO dentifrice slurry compared to distilled water (p < .05). No change in mean adsorbed fluoride concentration was observed after 24 h (p > .05). Both NAO and COCO were alkaline (pH > 7). Analysis of NAO revealed the presence of naphthalene (112.8 ± 2.0 ng/mL).

Conclusion: The charcoal-containing dentifrices were abrasive within acceptable limits set by ISO and did not adsorb fluoride. The presence of naphthalene in one product is a cause for concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信