Xinian Jiao, Xiyan Yu, Shuyuan Wang, Zishan Wang, Zhun Gong
{"title":"自我效能领域的效应量是否随时间而变化?meta-meta分析。","authors":"Xinian Jiao, Xiyan Yu, Shuyuan Wang, Zishan Wang, Zhun Gong","doi":"10.1002/ijop.12736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theories relating to self-efficacy have developed rapidly since Bandura first proposed the concept in 1977. In the past two decades, psychologists have carried out numerous studies to research the cultural and psychological changes in social development. The research topic of this study is whether self-efficacy changes over time. This study uses a meta-meta analysis and includes 13 meta-analyses, including 536 effect sizes, with a total sample size of 421,880. We find that individual self-efficacy increases over time, which may be related to social development trends. However, the effects of interventions on self-efficacy remain similar (Q<sub>model</sub> = 1.807, df = 1, p > .05), and a possible explanation is that time effects of self-efficacy confuse the effects of intervention, because both in the intervention group and control group, the average of self-efficacy increases over time. And we find that a general decline in the predictive effects of self-efficacy (Q<sub>model</sub> = 5.117, df = 1, p = .024), especially the ability to predict relatively objective variables (e.g. job performance, teaching effectiveness, and transfer of training). A possible explanation is that as social development people tend to overestimate their self-efficacy. Another possible explanation is that the effect sizes in the original studies being overrated, may due to intentional selective reporting or unintentional statistical errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":351827,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie","volume":" ","pages":"801-811"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ijop.12736","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are effect sizes in self-efficacy field changing over time? A meta-meta analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xinian Jiao, Xiyan Yu, Shuyuan Wang, Zishan Wang, Zhun Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijop.12736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Theories relating to self-efficacy have developed rapidly since Bandura first proposed the concept in 1977. In the past two decades, psychologists have carried out numerous studies to research the cultural and psychological changes in social development. The research topic of this study is whether self-efficacy changes over time. This study uses a meta-meta analysis and includes 13 meta-analyses, including 536 effect sizes, with a total sample size of 421,880. We find that individual self-efficacy increases over time, which may be related to social development trends. However, the effects of interventions on self-efficacy remain similar (Q<sub>model</sub> = 1.807, df = 1, p > .05), and a possible explanation is that time effects of self-efficacy confuse the effects of intervention, because both in the intervention group and control group, the average of self-efficacy increases over time. And we find that a general decline in the predictive effects of self-efficacy (Q<sub>model</sub> = 5.117, df = 1, p = .024), especially the ability to predict relatively objective variables (e.g. job performance, teaching effectiveness, and transfer of training). A possible explanation is that as social development people tend to overestimate their self-efficacy. Another possible explanation is that the effect sizes in the original studies being overrated, may due to intentional selective reporting or unintentional statistical errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":351827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"801-811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ijop.12736\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
自班杜拉于1977年首次提出自我效能的概念以来,与自我效能相关的理论发展迅速。在过去的二十年里,心理学家进行了大量的研究,以研究社会发展中的文化和心理变化。本研究的研究主题是自我效能是否随时间而改变。本研究采用meta-meta分析,共包含13项meta分析,536个效应量,总样本量为421880。我们发现个体的自我效能感随着时间的推移而增加,这可能与社会发展趋势有关。然而,干预对自我效能的影响仍然相似(Qmodel = 1.807, df = 1, p > 0.05),一种可能的解释是,自我效能的时间效应混淆了干预的效果,因为在干预组和对照组中,自我效能的平均值都随着时间的推移而增加。我们发现自我效能的预测效果普遍下降(Qmodel = 5.117, df = 1, p = 0.024),尤其是对相对客观变量(如工作绩效、教学有效性和培训转移)的预测能力下降。一个可能的解释是,随着社会的发展,人们倾向于高估自己的自我效能感。另一种可能的解释是,最初研究中的效应量被高估了,可能是由于有意的选择性报告或无意的统计错误。
Are effect sizes in self-efficacy field changing over time? A meta-meta analysis.
Theories relating to self-efficacy have developed rapidly since Bandura first proposed the concept in 1977. In the past two decades, psychologists have carried out numerous studies to research the cultural and psychological changes in social development. The research topic of this study is whether self-efficacy changes over time. This study uses a meta-meta analysis and includes 13 meta-analyses, including 536 effect sizes, with a total sample size of 421,880. We find that individual self-efficacy increases over time, which may be related to social development trends. However, the effects of interventions on self-efficacy remain similar (Qmodel = 1.807, df = 1, p > .05), and a possible explanation is that time effects of self-efficacy confuse the effects of intervention, because both in the intervention group and control group, the average of self-efficacy increases over time. And we find that a general decline in the predictive effects of self-efficacy (Qmodel = 5.117, df = 1, p = .024), especially the ability to predict relatively objective variables (e.g. job performance, teaching effectiveness, and transfer of training). A possible explanation is that as social development people tend to overestimate their self-efficacy. Another possible explanation is that the effect sizes in the original studies being overrated, may due to intentional selective reporting or unintentional statistical errors.