麻醉学住院医师在美国医疗执照考试中的表现预示着美国麻醉学委员会基本阶段考试的成功:一项观察性研究。

Travis H Markham, Johanna B de Haan, Sara Guzman-Reyes, John F Zaki, Semhar J Ghebremichael, Carlos Artime, Evan G Pivalizza
{"title":"麻醉学住院医师在美国医疗执照考试中的表现预示着美国麻醉学委员会基本阶段考试的成功:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Travis H Markham,&nbsp;Johanna B de Haan,&nbsp;Sara Guzman-Reyes,&nbsp;John F Zaki,&nbsp;Semhar J Ghebremichael,&nbsp;Carlos Artime,&nbsp;Evan G Pivalizza","doi":"10.46374/volxxii-issue3-Markham","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correlation has been found between the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 examination results and anesthesiology resident success on American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) examinations. In 2014, the ABA instituted the BASIC examination at the end of the postgraduate year-2 year. We hypothesized a similar predictive value of USMLE scores on BASIC examination success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at UTHealth Institutional Review Board approved and waived written consent, we retrospectively evaluated USMLE Step examination performance on first-time BASIC examination success in a single academic department from 2014-2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 years, 120 residents took the ABA BASIC examination and 108 (90%) passed on the first attempt. Ten of 12 first-time failures were successful on repeat examination but analyzed in the failure group. Complete data was available for 92 residents (76.7%), with absent scores primarily reflecting osteopathic graduates who completed Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States level examinations rather than USMLE. In the failure cohort, all 3 USMLE examination step scores were lower (<i>P</i> < .02). USMLE Step 1 score independently predicted success on the BASIC examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17, <i>P</i> < .001). Although USMLE Step 2 score predicted BASIC examination success (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.18, <i>P</i> = .001), this did not remain after adjustment for Step 1 score using multiple logistic regression (<i>P</i> = .11). In multivariable logistical regression, first clinical anesthesia in-training examination score and USMLE Step 1 score were significant for predictors of success on the BASIC exam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In anesthesiology residency training, our preliminary single-center data is the first to suggest that USMLE Step 1 performance could be used as a predictor of success on the recently introduced ABA BASIC Examination. These findings do not support recent action to change USMLE scoring to a pass/fail report.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"22 3","pages":"E646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664601/pdf/i2333-0406-22-3-markham.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesiology Resident Performance on the US Medical Licensing Examination Predicts Success on the American Board of Anesthesiology BASIC Staged Examination: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Travis H Markham,&nbsp;Johanna B de Haan,&nbsp;Sara Guzman-Reyes,&nbsp;John F Zaki,&nbsp;Semhar J Ghebremichael,&nbsp;Carlos Artime,&nbsp;Evan G Pivalizza\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxii-issue3-Markham\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Correlation has been found between the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 examination results and anesthesiology resident success on American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) examinations. In 2014, the ABA instituted the BASIC examination at the end of the postgraduate year-2 year. We hypothesized a similar predictive value of USMLE scores on BASIC examination success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at UTHealth Institutional Review Board approved and waived written consent, we retrospectively evaluated USMLE Step examination performance on first-time BASIC examination success in a single academic department from 2014-2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 years, 120 residents took the ABA BASIC examination and 108 (90%) passed on the first attempt. Ten of 12 first-time failures were successful on repeat examination but analyzed in the failure group. Complete data was available for 92 residents (76.7%), with absent scores primarily reflecting osteopathic graduates who completed Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States level examinations rather than USMLE. In the failure cohort, all 3 USMLE examination step scores were lower (<i>P</i> < .02). USMLE Step 1 score independently predicted success on the BASIC examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17, <i>P</i> < .001). Although USMLE Step 2 score predicted BASIC examination success (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.18, <i>P</i> = .001), this did not remain after adjustment for Step 1 score using multiple logistic regression (<i>P</i> = .11). In multivariable logistical regression, first clinical anesthesia in-training examination score and USMLE Step 1 score were significant for predictors of success on the BASIC exam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In anesthesiology residency training, our preliminary single-center data is the first to suggest that USMLE Step 1 performance could be used as a predictor of success on the recently introduced ABA BASIC Examination. These findings do not support recent action to change USMLE scoring to a pass/fail report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"E646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664601/pdf/i2333-0406-22-3-markham.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue3-Markham\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue3-Markham","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步考试结果与麻醉学住院医师在美国麻醉学委员会(ABA)考试中的成功之间存在相关性。2014年,美国律师协会在研究生二年级结束时设立了BASIC考试。我们假设USMLE分数对BASIC考试成功具有类似的预测价值。方法:在UTHealth机构审查委员会人类受试者保护委员会批准并放弃书面同意后,我们回顾性评估了2014-2018年单个学术部门首次BASIC考试成功的USMLE Step考试表现。结果:5年来,120名住院医师参加了ABA BASIC考试,其中108人(90%)一次通过。12例首次失败中有10例在重复检查中成功,但在失败组中进行分析。92名住院医师(76.7%)的完整数据可用,缺失分数主要反映完成美国综合骨科医师执照考试的骨科毕业生,而不是USMLE。在失败队列中,USMLE 3个检查步骤得分均较低(P < 0.02)。USMLE步骤1评分独立预测BASIC检查的成功(优势比[OR] 1.11, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.05-1.17, P < .001)。虽然USMLE第2步评分预测BASIC检查成功(OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.18, P = .001),但在使用多元逻辑回归调整第1步评分后(P = .11),这一预测并不存在。在多变量逻辑回归中,首次临床麻醉培训考试分数和USMLE第1步分数是基础考试成功的显著预测因子。结论:在麻醉学住院医师培训中,我们的初步单中心数据首次表明USMLE第1步的表现可以作为最近引入的ABA基础考试成功与否的预测指标。这些发现不支持最近将USMLE评分改为及格/不及格报告的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anesthesiology Resident Performance on the US Medical Licensing Examination Predicts Success on the American Board of Anesthesiology BASIC Staged Examination: An Observational Study.

Background: Correlation has been found between the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 examination results and anesthesiology resident success on American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) examinations. In 2014, the ABA instituted the BASIC examination at the end of the postgraduate year-2 year. We hypothesized a similar predictive value of USMLE scores on BASIC examination success.

Methods: After the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at UTHealth Institutional Review Board approved and waived written consent, we retrospectively evaluated USMLE Step examination performance on first-time BASIC examination success in a single academic department from 2014-2018.

Results: Over 5 years, 120 residents took the ABA BASIC examination and 108 (90%) passed on the first attempt. Ten of 12 first-time failures were successful on repeat examination but analyzed in the failure group. Complete data was available for 92 residents (76.7%), with absent scores primarily reflecting osteopathic graduates who completed Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States level examinations rather than USMLE. In the failure cohort, all 3 USMLE examination step scores were lower (P < .02). USMLE Step 1 score independently predicted success on the BASIC examination (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17, P < .001). Although USMLE Step 2 score predicted BASIC examination success (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.18, P = .001), this did not remain after adjustment for Step 1 score using multiple logistic regression (P = .11). In multivariable logistical regression, first clinical anesthesia in-training examination score and USMLE Step 1 score were significant for predictors of success on the BASIC exam.

Conclusions: In anesthesiology residency training, our preliminary single-center data is the first to suggest that USMLE Step 1 performance could be used as a predictor of success on the recently introduced ABA BASIC Examination. These findings do not support recent action to change USMLE scoring to a pass/fail report.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信