一种适应的新型流式细胞术方法来描述气道上皮细胞的细胞死亡类型。

Journal of biological methods Pub Date : 2020-11-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14440/jbm.2020.336
Samuel T Montgomery, Stephen M Stick, Anthony Kicic
{"title":"一种适应的新型流式细胞术方法来描述气道上皮细胞的细胞死亡类型。","authors":"Samuel T Montgomery,&nbsp;Stephen M Stick,&nbsp;Anthony Kicic","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2020.336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current methodologies to measure apoptotic and necrotic cell death using flow cytometry do not adequately differentiate between the two. Here, we describe a flow cytometry methodology adapted to airway epithelial cells (AEC) to sufficiently differentiate apoptotic and necrotic AEC. Specifically, cell lines and primary AEC (<i>n</i> = 12) were permeabilized or infected with rhinovirus 1b (RV1b) over 48 h. Cell death was then measured <i>via</i> annexin V/propidium iodide (A5/PI) or annexin V/TO-PRO-3 (A5/TP3) staining using a novel flow cytometry and gating methodology adapted to AEC. We show that A5/PI staining could not sufficiently differentiate between types of cell death following RV1b infection of primary AEC. However, A5/TP3 staining was able to distinguish six cell death populations (viable, necrotic, debris, A5<sup>+</sup> apoptotic, A5<sup>-</sup> apoptotic, apoptotic bodies) after permeabilization or infection with RV1b, with phenotypic differences were observed in apoptotic populations. Collectively, using a staining and gating strategy never adapted to AEC, A5/TP3 could accurately differentiate and quantify viable, necrotic, and apoptotic AEC following RV1b infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":" ","pages":"e139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/b1/jbm-7-4-e139.PMC7666329.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An adapted novel flow cytometry methodology to delineate types of cell death in airway epithelial cells.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel T Montgomery,&nbsp;Stephen M Stick,&nbsp;Anthony Kicic\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/jbm.2020.336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current methodologies to measure apoptotic and necrotic cell death using flow cytometry do not adequately differentiate between the two. Here, we describe a flow cytometry methodology adapted to airway epithelial cells (AEC) to sufficiently differentiate apoptotic and necrotic AEC. Specifically, cell lines and primary AEC (<i>n</i> = 12) were permeabilized or infected with rhinovirus 1b (RV1b) over 48 h. Cell death was then measured <i>via</i> annexin V/propidium iodide (A5/PI) or annexin V/TO-PRO-3 (A5/TP3) staining using a novel flow cytometry and gating methodology adapted to AEC. We show that A5/PI staining could not sufficiently differentiate between types of cell death following RV1b infection of primary AEC. However, A5/TP3 staining was able to distinguish six cell death populations (viable, necrotic, debris, A5<sup>+</sup> apoptotic, A5<sup>-</sup> apoptotic, apoptotic bodies) after permeabilization or infection with RV1b, with phenotypic differences were observed in apoptotic populations. Collectively, using a staining and gating strategy never adapted to AEC, A5/TP3 could accurately differentiate and quantify viable, necrotic, and apoptotic AEC following RV1b infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/b1/jbm-7-4-e139.PMC7666329.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2020.336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2020.336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前使用流式细胞术测量凋亡和坏死细胞死亡的方法不能充分区分两者。在这里,我们描述了一种适用于气道上皮细胞(AEC)的流式细胞术方法,以充分区分凋亡和坏死的AEC。具体来说,细胞系和原代AEC (n = 12)在48小时内被鼻病毒1b (RV1b)渗透或感染。然后使用适用于AEC的新型流式细胞术和门控方法,通过膜联蛋白V/碘化丙啶(A5/PI)或膜联蛋白V/ to - pro -3 (A5/TP3)染色来测量细胞死亡。我们发现A5/PI染色不能充分区分RV1b感染原发AEC后细胞死亡的类型。然而,A5/TP3染色能够区分透性或感染RV1b后的6种细胞死亡群体(活细胞、坏死细胞、碎片细胞、A5+凋亡细胞、A5-凋亡细胞、凋亡小体细胞),凋亡群体之间存在表型差异。总的来说,使用从未适应于AEC的染色和门控策略,A5/TP3可以准确地区分和量化RV1b感染后的活的、坏死的和凋亡的AEC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An adapted novel flow cytometry methodology to delineate types of cell death in airway epithelial cells.

An adapted novel flow cytometry methodology to delineate types of cell death in airway epithelial cells.

An adapted novel flow cytometry methodology to delineate types of cell death in airway epithelial cells.

An adapted novel flow cytometry methodology to delineate types of cell death in airway epithelial cells.

Current methodologies to measure apoptotic and necrotic cell death using flow cytometry do not adequately differentiate between the two. Here, we describe a flow cytometry methodology adapted to airway epithelial cells (AEC) to sufficiently differentiate apoptotic and necrotic AEC. Specifically, cell lines and primary AEC (n = 12) were permeabilized or infected with rhinovirus 1b (RV1b) over 48 h. Cell death was then measured via annexin V/propidium iodide (A5/PI) or annexin V/TO-PRO-3 (A5/TP3) staining using a novel flow cytometry and gating methodology adapted to AEC. We show that A5/PI staining could not sufficiently differentiate between types of cell death following RV1b infection of primary AEC. However, A5/TP3 staining was able to distinguish six cell death populations (viable, necrotic, debris, A5+ apoptotic, A5- apoptotic, apoptotic bodies) after permeabilization or infection with RV1b, with phenotypic differences were observed in apoptotic populations. Collectively, using a staining and gating strategy never adapted to AEC, A5/TP3 could accurately differentiate and quantify viable, necrotic, and apoptotic AEC following RV1b infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信