化学渗透、进化冲突和真核生物共生。

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Neil W Blackstone
{"title":"化学渗透、进化冲突和真核生物共生。","authors":"Neil W Blackstone","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-51849-3_9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutualistic symbiosis, in which individuals of different species cooperate and both benefit, has long been an evolutionary puzzle. Why should individuals of two different species cooperate? In this case, as in all others, cooperation is not automatic, but rather requires the mediation of evolutionary conflicts. In chemiosmosis, redox reactions produce a trans-membrane \"proton-motive force\" that powers energy-requiring reactions in most organisms. Chemiosmosis may also have a role in conflict mediation. Chemiosmosis rapidly produces considerable amounts of products, increasing the risk of end-product inhibition and the formation of dangerous by-products, such as reactive oxygen species. While several mechanisms can modulate chemiosmosis, potential negative effects can also be ameliorated by simply dispersing excess product into the environment. This \"free lunch you are forced to make\" can attract individuals of other species leading to groups, in which other organisms share the products that are released into the environment by the chemiosmotic cell or organism. Since the time of Darwin, evolutionary biology has recognized that groups are the key to the evolution of cooperation. With many small groups, chance associations of cooperators can arise, even if cooperation is selected against at the individual level. Groups of cooperators can then outcompete groups of defectors, which do not cooperate. Indeed, numerous symbioses may have arisen in this way, perhaps most notably the symbioses of host cells and chemiosmotic bacteria that gave rise to the eukaryotic cell. Other examples in which one partner relies on chemiosmotic products supplied by the other include lichens, corals or other metazoans and dinoflagellates, sap-feeding insects, and plant-rhizobia and plant-mycorrhiza interactions. More problematic are cases of gut microbiomes-for instance, those of termites, ruminants, and even human beings. Under some but not all circumstances, chemiosmosis can be co-opted into punishing defectors and enforcing cooperation, thus leading to mutualistic symbioses.</p>","PeriodicalId":39320,"journal":{"name":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-030-51849-3_9","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemiosmosis, Evolutionary Conflict, and Eukaryotic Symbiosis.\",\"authors\":\"Neil W Blackstone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-030-51849-3_9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mutualistic symbiosis, in which individuals of different species cooperate and both benefit, has long been an evolutionary puzzle. Why should individuals of two different species cooperate? In this case, as in all others, cooperation is not automatic, but rather requires the mediation of evolutionary conflicts. In chemiosmosis, redox reactions produce a trans-membrane \\\"proton-motive force\\\" that powers energy-requiring reactions in most organisms. Chemiosmosis may also have a role in conflict mediation. Chemiosmosis rapidly produces considerable amounts of products, increasing the risk of end-product inhibition and the formation of dangerous by-products, such as reactive oxygen species. While several mechanisms can modulate chemiosmosis, potential negative effects can also be ameliorated by simply dispersing excess product into the environment. This \\\"free lunch you are forced to make\\\" can attract individuals of other species leading to groups, in which other organisms share the products that are released into the environment by the chemiosmotic cell or organism. Since the time of Darwin, evolutionary biology has recognized that groups are the key to the evolution of cooperation. With many small groups, chance associations of cooperators can arise, even if cooperation is selected against at the individual level. Groups of cooperators can then outcompete groups of defectors, which do not cooperate. Indeed, numerous symbioses may have arisen in this way, perhaps most notably the symbioses of host cells and chemiosmotic bacteria that gave rise to the eukaryotic cell. Other examples in which one partner relies on chemiosmotic products supplied by the other include lichens, corals or other metazoans and dinoflagellates, sap-feeding insects, and plant-rhizobia and plant-mycorrhiza interactions. More problematic are cases of gut microbiomes-for instance, those of termites, ruminants, and even human beings. Under some but not all circumstances, chemiosmosis can be co-opted into punishing defectors and enforcing cooperation, thus leading to mutualistic symbioses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-030-51849-3_9\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51849-3_9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51849-3_9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

互惠共生,即不同物种的个体合作且双方都受益,长期以来一直是一个进化难题。为什么两个不同物种的个体要合作?在这种情况下,就像所有其他情况一样,合作不是自动的,而是需要进化冲突的调解。在化学渗透中,氧化还原反应产生跨膜的“质子动力”,为大多数生物体中需要能量的反应提供动力。化学渗透也可能在冲突调解中发挥作用。化学渗透迅速产生相当数量的产物,增加了最终产物抑制的风险和形成危险的副产物,如活性氧。虽然有几种机制可以调节化学渗透,但潜在的负面影响也可以通过简单地将多余的产物分散到环境中来改善。这种“你被迫做的免费午餐”可以吸引其他物种的个体,从而形成群体,在群体中,其他生物共享由化学渗透细胞或有机体释放到环境中的产物。自达尔文时代以来,进化生物学已经认识到群体是合作进化的关键。在许多小团体中,即使在个人层面上选择反对合作,也可能出现合作者的偶然联系。这样,合作的群体就能战胜不合作的叛逃者群体。事实上,许多共生可能以这种方式出现,也许最引人注目的是宿主细胞和化学渗透细菌的共生,产生了真核细胞。其中一方依赖另一方提供的化学渗透产物的其他例子包括地衣、珊瑚或其他后生动物和鞭毛藻、取食汁液的昆虫,以及植物-根瘤菌和植物-菌根的相互作用。更有问题的是肠道微生物群——例如,白蚁、反刍动物甚至人类的肠道微生物群。在某些情况下,但不是所有情况下,化学渗透可以被用来惩罚叛逃者和加强合作,从而导致互惠共生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemiosmosis, Evolutionary Conflict, and Eukaryotic Symbiosis.

Mutualistic symbiosis, in which individuals of different species cooperate and both benefit, has long been an evolutionary puzzle. Why should individuals of two different species cooperate? In this case, as in all others, cooperation is not automatic, but rather requires the mediation of evolutionary conflicts. In chemiosmosis, redox reactions produce a trans-membrane "proton-motive force" that powers energy-requiring reactions in most organisms. Chemiosmosis may also have a role in conflict mediation. Chemiosmosis rapidly produces considerable amounts of products, increasing the risk of end-product inhibition and the formation of dangerous by-products, such as reactive oxygen species. While several mechanisms can modulate chemiosmosis, potential negative effects can also be ameliorated by simply dispersing excess product into the environment. This "free lunch you are forced to make" can attract individuals of other species leading to groups, in which other organisms share the products that are released into the environment by the chemiosmotic cell or organism. Since the time of Darwin, evolutionary biology has recognized that groups are the key to the evolution of cooperation. With many small groups, chance associations of cooperators can arise, even if cooperation is selected against at the individual level. Groups of cooperators can then outcompete groups of defectors, which do not cooperate. Indeed, numerous symbioses may have arisen in this way, perhaps most notably the symbioses of host cells and chemiosmotic bacteria that gave rise to the eukaryotic cell. Other examples in which one partner relies on chemiosmotic products supplied by the other include lichens, corals or other metazoans and dinoflagellates, sap-feeding insects, and plant-rhizobia and plant-mycorrhiza interactions. More problematic are cases of gut microbiomes-for instance, those of termites, ruminants, and even human beings. Under some but not all circumstances, chemiosmosis can be co-opted into punishing defectors and enforcing cooperation, thus leading to mutualistic symbioses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation
Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Developmental Biology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation is an up-to-date book series that presents and explores selected questions of cell and developmental biology. Each volume focuses on a single, well-defined topic. Reviews address basic questions and phenomena, but also provide concise information on the most recent advances. Together, the volumes provide a valuable overview of this exciting and dynamically expanding field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信