社交焦虑中情绪敏感性的ERP证据

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lixia Cui , Xiaofei Dong , Shuang Zhang
{"title":"社交焦虑中情绪敏感性的ERP证据","authors":"Lixia Cui ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Dong ,&nbsp;Shuang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emotional sensitivity involves the ability to recognize and interpret facial expressions. This is very important for interpersonal communication. Previous studies found differences in emotional sensitivity between high social anxiety (HSA) individuals and low social anxiety (LSA) individuals. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are still unclear. The present study explored the effects of expression intensity and social anxiety on emotional sensitivity and their neural mechanisms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The HSA group (n = 20) and the LSA group (n = 20) were asked to recognize anger expressions with different intensities in an emotion recognition task. The hit rate, reaction time, early time window (P1, N170), and late time window (LPP) were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that individuals with HSA had a significantly higher hit rate and shorter reaction time than individuals with LSA (p &lt; 0.01). Event-related potential (ERP) results showed that, compared to the LSA group, the HSA group exhibited significantly enhanced N170 and LPP amplitude (p &lt; 0.01). However, the difference in P1 amplitude was not significant (p &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The participants in this study were a subclinical social anxiety sample, and the effects of other mood disorders were not excluded, partially limiting the generalizability of the results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that, compared to LSA individuals, HSA individuals are more sensitive to all presented faces. The ERP results indicated that HSA individuals’ high sensitivity to threatening expressions is related to stronger structural encoding and fine processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"279 ","pages":"Pages 361-367"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.111","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ERP evidence for emotional sensitivity in social anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Lixia Cui ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Dong ,&nbsp;Shuang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emotional sensitivity involves the ability to recognize and interpret facial expressions. This is very important for interpersonal communication. Previous studies found differences in emotional sensitivity between high social anxiety (HSA) individuals and low social anxiety (LSA) individuals. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are still unclear. The present study explored the effects of expression intensity and social anxiety on emotional sensitivity and their neural mechanisms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The HSA group (n = 20) and the LSA group (n = 20) were asked to recognize anger expressions with different intensities in an emotion recognition task. The hit rate, reaction time, early time window (P1, N170), and late time window (LPP) were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that individuals with HSA had a significantly higher hit rate and shorter reaction time than individuals with LSA (p &lt; 0.01). Event-related potential (ERP) results showed that, compared to the LSA group, the HSA group exhibited significantly enhanced N170 and LPP amplitude (p &lt; 0.01). However, the difference in P1 amplitude was not significant (p &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The participants in this study were a subclinical social anxiety sample, and the effects of other mood disorders were not excluded, partially limiting the generalizability of the results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that, compared to LSA individuals, HSA individuals are more sensitive to all presented faces. The ERP results indicated that HSA individuals’ high sensitivity to threatening expressions is related to stronger structural encoding and fine processing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 361-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.111\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016503272032807X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016503272032807X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

情感敏感性包括识别和解释面部表情的能力。这对人际交往非常重要。以往的研究发现,高社交焦虑(HSA)个体和低社交焦虑(LSA)个体的情绪敏感性存在差异。然而,潜在的神经机制尚不清楚。本研究探讨了表达强度和社交焦虑对情绪敏感性的影响及其神经机制。方法在情绪识别任务中要求HSA组(n = 20)和LSA组(n = 20)识别不同强度的愤怒表达。记录命中率、反应时间、早时间窗(P1, N170)和晚时间窗(LPP)。结果HSA个体比LSA个体有更高的命中率和更短的反应时间(p <0.01)。事件相关电位(ERP)结果显示,与LSA组相比,HSA组的N170和LPP振幅显著增强(p <0.01)。但P1幅值差异不显著(p >0.05)。本研究的参与者为亚临床社交焦虑样本,未排除其他情绪障碍的影响,部分限制了结果的普遍性。结论与LSA个体相比,HSA个体对所有呈现的人脸更敏感。ERP结果表明,HSA个体对威胁性表达的高敏感性与较强的结构编码和精细加工有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ERP evidence for emotional sensitivity in social anxiety

Background

Emotional sensitivity involves the ability to recognize and interpret facial expressions. This is very important for interpersonal communication. Previous studies found differences in emotional sensitivity between high social anxiety (HSA) individuals and low social anxiety (LSA) individuals. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are still unclear. The present study explored the effects of expression intensity and social anxiety on emotional sensitivity and their neural mechanisms.

Methods

The HSA group (n = 20) and the LSA group (n = 20) were asked to recognize anger expressions with different intensities in an emotion recognition task. The hit rate, reaction time, early time window (P1, N170), and late time window (LPP) were recorded.

Results

The results showed that individuals with HSA had a significantly higher hit rate and shorter reaction time than individuals with LSA (p < 0.01). Event-related potential (ERP) results showed that, compared to the LSA group, the HSA group exhibited significantly enhanced N170 and LPP amplitude (p < 0.01). However, the difference in P1 amplitude was not significant (p > 0.05).

Limitations

The participants in this study were a subclinical social anxiety sample, and the effects of other mood disorders were not excluded, partially limiting the generalizability of the results.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that, compared to LSA individuals, HSA individuals are more sensitive to all presented faces. The ERP results indicated that HSA individuals’ high sensitivity to threatening expressions is related to stronger structural encoding and fine processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信