快速IgM/IgG抗体检测对COVID-19患者SARS-CoV-2抗体反应的血清学评价

Q1 Environmental Science
Yang De Marinis, Torgny Sunnerhagen, Pradeep Bompada, Anna Bläckberg, Runtao Yang, Joel Svensson, Ola Ekström, Karl-Fredrik Eriksson, Ola Hansson, Leif Groop, Isabel Gonçalves, Magnus Rasmussen
{"title":"快速IgM/IgG抗体检测对COVID-19患者SARS-CoV-2抗体反应的血清学评价","authors":"Yang De Marinis,&nbsp;Torgny Sunnerhagen,&nbsp;Pradeep Bompada,&nbsp;Anna Bläckberg,&nbsp;Runtao Yang,&nbsp;Joel Svensson,&nbsp;Ola Ekström,&nbsp;Karl-Fredrik Eriksson,&nbsp;Ola Hansson,&nbsp;Leif Groop,&nbsp;Isabel Gonçalves,&nbsp;Magnus Rasmussen","doi":"10.1080/20008686.2020.1821513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created a global health- and economic crisis. Detection of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which causes COVID-19 by serological methods is important to diagnose a current or resolved infection. In this study, we applied a rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG antibody test and performed serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. In PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (n = 45), the total antibody detection rate is 92% in hospitalized patients and 79% in non-hospitalized patients. The total IgM and IgG detection is 63% in patients with <2 weeks from disease onset; 85% in non-hospitalized patients with >2 weeks disease duration; and 91% in hospitalized patients with >2 weeks disease duration. We also compared different blood sample types and suggest a higher sensitivity by serum/plasma over whole blood. Test specificity was determined to be 97% on 69 sera/plasma samples collected between 2016-2018. Our study provides a comprehensive validation of the rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG serology test, and mapped antibody detection patterns in association with disease progress and hospitalization. Our results support that the rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG test may be applied to assess the COVID-19 status both at the individual and at a population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":37446,"journal":{"name":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","volume":"10 1","pages":"1821513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20008686.2020.1821513","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 by rapid IgM/IgG antibody test.\",\"authors\":\"Yang De Marinis,&nbsp;Torgny Sunnerhagen,&nbsp;Pradeep Bompada,&nbsp;Anna Bläckberg,&nbsp;Runtao Yang,&nbsp;Joel Svensson,&nbsp;Ola Ekström,&nbsp;Karl-Fredrik Eriksson,&nbsp;Ola Hansson,&nbsp;Leif Groop,&nbsp;Isabel Gonçalves,&nbsp;Magnus Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008686.2020.1821513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created a global health- and economic crisis. Detection of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which causes COVID-19 by serological methods is important to diagnose a current or resolved infection. In this study, we applied a rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG antibody test and performed serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. In PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (n = 45), the total antibody detection rate is 92% in hospitalized patients and 79% in non-hospitalized patients. The total IgM and IgG detection is 63% in patients with <2 weeks from disease onset; 85% in non-hospitalized patients with >2 weeks disease duration; and 91% in hospitalized patients with >2 weeks disease duration. We also compared different blood sample types and suggest a higher sensitivity by serum/plasma over whole blood. Test specificity was determined to be 97% on 69 sera/plasma samples collected between 2016-2018. Our study provides a comprehensive validation of the rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG serology test, and mapped antibody detection patterns in association with disease progress and hospitalization. Our results support that the rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG test may be applied to assess the COVID-19 status both at the individual and at a population level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1821513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20008686.2020.1821513\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2020.1821513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2020.1821513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行造成了全球卫生和经济危机。通过血清学方法检测引起COVID-19的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)抗体对于诊断当前或已解决的感染非常重要。在本研究中,我们采用了COVID-19 IgM/IgG快速抗体检测,并对抗体对SARS-CoV-2的反应进行了血清学评估。在pcr确诊的COVID-19患者(n = 45)中,住院患者总抗体检出率为92%,非住院患者总抗体检出率为79%。病程2周的患者IgM和IgG总检出率为63%;病程>2周的住院患者占91%。我们还比较了不同的血液样本类型,并建议血清/血浆比全血灵敏度更高。2016-2018年间收集的69份血清/血浆样本的检测特异性为97%。我们的研究全面验证了COVID-19 IgM/IgG快速血清学检测,并绘制了与疾病进展和住院相关的抗体检测模式。我们的结果支持快速COVID-19 IgM/IgG检测可用于评估个体和群体水平的COVID-19状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 by rapid IgM/IgG antibody test.

Serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 by rapid IgM/IgG antibody test.

Serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 by rapid IgM/IgG antibody test.

Serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 by rapid IgM/IgG antibody test.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created a global health- and economic crisis. Detection of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which causes COVID-19 by serological methods is important to diagnose a current or resolved infection. In this study, we applied a rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG antibody test and performed serology assessment of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. In PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (n = 45), the total antibody detection rate is 92% in hospitalized patients and 79% in non-hospitalized patients. The total IgM and IgG detection is 63% in patients with <2 weeks from disease onset; 85% in non-hospitalized patients with >2 weeks disease duration; and 91% in hospitalized patients with >2 weeks disease duration. We also compared different blood sample types and suggest a higher sensitivity by serum/plasma over whole blood. Test specificity was determined to be 97% on 69 sera/plasma samples collected between 2016-2018. Our study provides a comprehensive validation of the rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG serology test, and mapped antibody detection patterns in association with disease progress and hospitalization. Our results support that the rapid COVID-19 IgM/IgG test may be applied to assess the COVID-19 status both at the individual and at a population level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology aims to stimulate inter-disciplinary collaborations dealing with a range of subjects, from the plethora of zoonotic infections in humans, over diseases with implication in wildlife ecology, to advanced virology and bacteriology. The journal specifically welcomes papers from studies where researchers from multiple medical and ecological disciplines are collaborating so as to increase our knowledge of the emergence, spread and effect of new and re-emerged infectious diseases in humans, domestic animals and wildlife. Main areas of interest include, but are not limited to: 1.Zoonotic microbioorganisms 2.Vector borne infections 3.Gastrointestinal pathogens 4.Antimicrobial resistance 5.Zoonotic microbioorganisms in changing environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信