Maria Lucia Specchia, Alessio Perilli, Andrea Di Pilla, Elettra Carini, Nila Tofani, Walter Ricciardi, Gianfranco Damiani
{"title":"在儿科或新生儿重症监护病房实施临床风险管理工具的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Maria Lucia Specchia, Alessio Perilli, Andrea Di Pilla, Elettra Carini, Nila Tofani, Walter Ricciardi, Gianfranco Damiani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical risk management is a key area in terms of healthcare quality, especially within intensive-care settings and in the case of pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of tools for clinical risk management in pediatric intensive-care settings. Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology (June 2019). Primary studies of applicative experiences of clinical risk management that had impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included. A total of 1178 articles were reviewed and 20 were included. Reactive risk management tools were used in 10 studies; proactive tools in 7; both reactive and proactive tools in 3. Sixteen studies out of 20 concerned drugs; other topics included: transition from hospital to primary care, hand hygiene, organizational aspects, human milk administration. Seven studies (35%) reported organizational impacts; Ten studies (50%) reported clinical and organizational impacts; Three studies (15%) reported organizational, clinical and economic impacts. The introduction of clinical risk management tools resulted in changes within the setting considered; combined use of reactive and proactive methodologies was highlighted in various studies, as well as an increasing focus on proactive tools, both drawing a growing trend over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"76 4","pages":"225-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the implementation of clinical risk management tools in Pediatric or Neonatal Intensive Care Units: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Lucia Specchia, Alessio Perilli, Andrea Di Pilla, Elettra Carini, Nila Tofani, Walter Ricciardi, Gianfranco Damiani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical risk management is a key area in terms of healthcare quality, especially within intensive-care settings and in the case of pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of tools for clinical risk management in pediatric intensive-care settings. Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology (June 2019). Primary studies of applicative experiences of clinical risk management that had impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included. A total of 1178 articles were reviewed and 20 were included. Reactive risk management tools were used in 10 studies; proactive tools in 7; both reactive and proactive tools in 3. Sixteen studies out of 20 concerned drugs; other topics included: transition from hospital to primary care, hand hygiene, organizational aspects, human milk administration. Seven studies (35%) reported organizational impacts; Ten studies (50%) reported clinical and organizational impacts; Three studies (15%) reported organizational, clinical and economic impacts. The introduction of clinical risk management tools resulted in changes within the setting considered; combined use of reactive and proactive methodologies was highlighted in various studies, as well as an increasing focus on proactive tools, both drawing a growing trend over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Igiene e sanita pubblica\",\"volume\":\"76 4\",\"pages\":\"225-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Igiene e sanita pubblica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
临床风险管理是医疗保健质量的关键领域,特别是在重症监护环境和儿科患者的情况下。本综述的目的是评估儿科重症监护环境中临床风险管理工具的影响。我们询问了Pubmed和Web of Science,使用PICO方法进行了系统评价(2019年6月)。包括临床风险管理在儿科重症监护病房的应用经验的初步研究。共审查了1178篇文章,其中20篇被纳入。10项研究使用了反应性风险管理工具;7 .主动工具;包括被动工具和主动工具。20项研究中有16项涉及药物;其他主题包括:从医院到初级保健的过渡,手卫生,组织方面,母乳管理。七项研究(35%)报告了组织影响;10项研究(50%)报告了临床和组织影响;三项研究(15%)报告了组织、临床和经济影响。临床风险管理工具的引入导致所考虑的环境发生变化;各种研究都强调了被动和主动方法的结合使用,以及对主动工具的日益关注,两者都随着时间的推移呈现出日益增长的趋势。
The impact of the implementation of clinical risk management tools in Pediatric or Neonatal Intensive Care Units: a systematic review.
Clinical risk management is a key area in terms of healthcare quality, especially within intensive-care settings and in the case of pediatric patients. The objective of this review is to assess the impact of tools for clinical risk management in pediatric intensive-care settings. Pubmed and Web of Science were queried to carry out a systematic review, using the PICO methodology (June 2019). Primary studies of applicative experiences of clinical risk management that had impacts in pediatric intensive care units were included. A total of 1178 articles were reviewed and 20 were included. Reactive risk management tools were used in 10 studies; proactive tools in 7; both reactive and proactive tools in 3. Sixteen studies out of 20 concerned drugs; other topics included: transition from hospital to primary care, hand hygiene, organizational aspects, human milk administration. Seven studies (35%) reported organizational impacts; Ten studies (50%) reported clinical and organizational impacts; Three studies (15%) reported organizational, clinical and economic impacts. The introduction of clinical risk management tools resulted in changes within the setting considered; combined use of reactive and proactive methodologies was highlighted in various studies, as well as an increasing focus on proactive tools, both drawing a growing trend over time.