智能手机上的眼科医生:基于图像的远程会诊。

Q3 Medicine
Amit Mohan, Navjot Kaur, Vinod Sharma, Pradhnya Sen, Elesh Jain, Manju Gajraj
{"title":"智能手机上的眼科医生:基于图像的远程会诊。","authors":"Amit Mohan,&nbsp;Navjot Kaur,&nbsp;Vinod Sharma,&nbsp;Pradhnya Sen,&nbsp;Elesh Jain,&nbsp;Manju Gajraj","doi":"10.22599/bioj.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teleophthalmology has the potential to facilitate wider access to expert advice. It includes viewing of ophthalmic images by experts either on handheld devices like smartphones/tablets or office devices such as computer screens. However, to ensure rapid feedback, the turnaround time of any consultation must be kept to a minimum which requires use of handheld user-friendly devices. The purpose of this study was to assess whether images of different eye ailments viewed on smartphones and tablets are of comparable subjective quality as those viewed on a computer screen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study comparing the subjective quality of images on a smartphone, tablet and computer screen. Thirty images were analysed - 10 of extraocular morphology, 10 of the anterior segment pathology and 10 of retinal diseases. Ten ophthalmologists participated and were instructed to rate the overall quality of each image on a 7-point Likert scale (terrible-1, poor-2, average-3, fair-4, good-5, very good-6, excellent-7).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall smartphones were found to have higher ratings of subjective image quality (5.9 ± 0.48) than images displayed on tablets (5.13 ± 0.51) and computers (5.0 ± 0.37). The images were rated 'good' or 'very good' in all (100%) of the smartphone images. Fundus images and extraocular images were rated higher than anterior segment images on the smartphone. When comparing the two handheld devices with computers, both smartphones and tablets had similar image quality (p > 0.05, not significant) to computer images. However, for extraocular diseases, smartphone (6.1 ± 0.32) had significantly better image quality and images were easier to interpret compared to images on the computer (p < 0.05).Smartphones were rated 'very good' in 88.33% cases. All consultants (n = 10) were comfortable with the use of smartphone images and were already using it for teleconsultation at least three times in a month. Vision technicians reported minimum delay in getting advice when sending the images on mobile application to expert ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartphones can be used for teleconsultation. Subjective qualities of ophthalmic images on a smartphone are similar to those on tablets and computers. For rural communities that rely on teleconsultation, this small study provides useful evidence which may support the use of smartphones, tablets or computers for viewing ophthalmic images.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510393/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ophthalmologists on Smartphones: Image-Based Teleconsultation.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Mohan,&nbsp;Navjot Kaur,&nbsp;Vinod Sharma,&nbsp;Pradhnya Sen,&nbsp;Elesh Jain,&nbsp;Manju Gajraj\",\"doi\":\"10.22599/bioj.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teleophthalmology has the potential to facilitate wider access to expert advice. It includes viewing of ophthalmic images by experts either on handheld devices like smartphones/tablets or office devices such as computer screens. However, to ensure rapid feedback, the turnaround time of any consultation must be kept to a minimum which requires use of handheld user-friendly devices. The purpose of this study was to assess whether images of different eye ailments viewed on smartphones and tablets are of comparable subjective quality as those viewed on a computer screen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study comparing the subjective quality of images on a smartphone, tablet and computer screen. Thirty images were analysed - 10 of extraocular morphology, 10 of the anterior segment pathology and 10 of retinal diseases. Ten ophthalmologists participated and were instructed to rate the overall quality of each image on a 7-point Likert scale (terrible-1, poor-2, average-3, fair-4, good-5, very good-6, excellent-7).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall smartphones were found to have higher ratings of subjective image quality (5.9 ± 0.48) than images displayed on tablets (5.13 ± 0.51) and computers (5.0 ± 0.37). The images were rated 'good' or 'very good' in all (100%) of the smartphone images. Fundus images and extraocular images were rated higher than anterior segment images on the smartphone. When comparing the two handheld devices with computers, both smartphones and tablets had similar image quality (p > 0.05, not significant) to computer images. However, for extraocular diseases, smartphone (6.1 ± 0.32) had significantly better image quality and images were easier to interpret compared to images on the computer (p < 0.05).Smartphones were rated 'very good' in 88.33% cases. All consultants (n = 10) were comfortable with the use of smartphone images and were already using it for teleconsultation at least three times in a month. Vision technicians reported minimum delay in getting advice when sending the images on mobile application to expert ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartphones can be used for teleconsultation. Subjective qualities of ophthalmic images on a smartphone are similar to those on tablets and computers. For rural communities that rely on teleconsultation, this small study provides useful evidence which may support the use of smartphones, tablets or computers for viewing ophthalmic images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510393/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:远距眼科有潜力促进更广泛地获得专家意见。它包括由专家在智能手机/平板电脑等手持设备或电脑屏幕等办公设备上查看眼科图像。然而,为了确保快速反馈,任何咨询的周转时间必须保持在最低限度,这需要使用手持用户友好的设备。这项研究的目的是评估在智能手机和平板电脑上看到的不同眼疾的图像是否与在电脑屏幕上看到的图像具有可比性。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,比较了智能手机、平板电脑和电脑屏幕上图像的主观质量。对30张图像进行分析,其中眼外形态学10张,前段病理10张,视网膜病变10张。10名眼科医生参与了这项研究,并被要求按照7分的李克特量表(糟糕-1,差-2,平均-3,一般-4,好-5,非常好-6,极好-7)对每张图像的整体质量进行评分。结果:总体而言,智能手机的主观图像质量评分(5.9±0.48)高于平板电脑(5.13±0.51)和电脑(5.0±0.37)。所有智能手机上的照片都被评为“好”或“非常好”(100%)。眼底图像和眼外图像的评分高于智能手机上的前段图像。当将两种手持设备与计算机进行比较时,智能手机和平板电脑的图像质量与计算机图像相似(p > 0.05,不显著)。然而,对于眼外疾病,智能手机(6.1±0.32)的图像质量明显优于计算机(p < 0.05),图像更容易解释。在88.33%的案例中,智能手机被评为“非常好”。所有咨询师(n = 10)都对使用智能手机图像感到满意,并且已经在每月至少三次使用它进行远程咨询。视觉技术人员报告说,当通过移动应用程序将图像发送给眼科专家时,获得建议的延迟最小。结论:智能手机可用于远程会诊。智能手机上的眼科图像的主观质量与平板电脑和电脑上的图像相似。对于依赖远程会诊的农村社区,这项小型研究提供了有用的证据,可能支持使用智能手机、平板电脑或电脑查看眼科图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ophthalmologists on Smartphones: Image-Based Teleconsultation.

Ophthalmologists on Smartphones: Image-Based Teleconsultation.

Ophthalmologists on Smartphones: Image-Based Teleconsultation.

Background: Teleophthalmology has the potential to facilitate wider access to expert advice. It includes viewing of ophthalmic images by experts either on handheld devices like smartphones/tablets or office devices such as computer screens. However, to ensure rapid feedback, the turnaround time of any consultation must be kept to a minimum which requires use of handheld user-friendly devices. The purpose of this study was to assess whether images of different eye ailments viewed on smartphones and tablets are of comparable subjective quality as those viewed on a computer screen.

Methods: This was a prospective study comparing the subjective quality of images on a smartphone, tablet and computer screen. Thirty images were analysed - 10 of extraocular morphology, 10 of the anterior segment pathology and 10 of retinal diseases. Ten ophthalmologists participated and were instructed to rate the overall quality of each image on a 7-point Likert scale (terrible-1, poor-2, average-3, fair-4, good-5, very good-6, excellent-7).

Results: Overall smartphones were found to have higher ratings of subjective image quality (5.9 ± 0.48) than images displayed on tablets (5.13 ± 0.51) and computers (5.0 ± 0.37). The images were rated 'good' or 'very good' in all (100%) of the smartphone images. Fundus images and extraocular images were rated higher than anterior segment images on the smartphone. When comparing the two handheld devices with computers, both smartphones and tablets had similar image quality (p > 0.05, not significant) to computer images. However, for extraocular diseases, smartphone (6.1 ± 0.32) had significantly better image quality and images were easier to interpret compared to images on the computer (p < 0.05).Smartphones were rated 'very good' in 88.33% cases. All consultants (n = 10) were comfortable with the use of smartphone images and were already using it for teleconsultation at least three times in a month. Vision technicians reported minimum delay in getting advice when sending the images on mobile application to expert ophthalmologists.

Conclusion: Smartphones can be used for teleconsultation. Subjective qualities of ophthalmic images on a smartphone are similar to those on tablets and computers. For rural communities that rely on teleconsultation, this small study provides useful evidence which may support the use of smartphones, tablets or computers for viewing ophthalmic images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信