复数 "s "与所有格 "s "的双重分离:来自语法生成测试的证据。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-23 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2020.1833851
Melissa D Stockbridge, Alexandra Walker, William Matchin, Bonnie L Breining, Julius Fridriksson, Argye E Hillis, Gregory Hickok
{"title":"复数 \"s \"与所有格 \"s \"的双重分离:来自语法生成测试的证据。","authors":"Melissa D Stockbridge, Alexandra Walker, William Matchin, Bonnie L Breining, Julius Fridriksson, Argye E Hillis, Gregory Hickok","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2020.1833851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with aphasia demonstrate impaired production of bound inflectional morphemes, such as noun plurals and possession. They often show greater difficulty in marking possession versus plurality. Using a new tool for eliciting language, the Morphosyntactic Generation test, we assessed people with primary progressive aphasia and those in the acute and chronic phase following left hemisphere stroke. Clinical profiles were associated with different strengths and weaknesses in language production. Performance of the plural was stronger than possessive in group analyses. However, some individuals demonstrated the inverse pattern of performance. These participants provide counter-evidence to the theory that difficulty with marking possessives is purely the result of their greater cognitive-linguistic complexity and support a functional double dissociation between possessives and plurals. The deficits resulted from morphosyntactic impairment. Future work is needed to understand why plural and possessive markers were differently sensitive to neurological disorders of language.</p>","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":"38 1","pages":"116-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855872/pdf/nihms-1641103.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A double dissociation between plural and possessive \\\"s\\\": Evidence from the Morphosyntactic Generation test.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa D Stockbridge, Alexandra Walker, William Matchin, Bonnie L Breining, Julius Fridriksson, Argye E Hillis, Gregory Hickok\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02643294.2020.1833851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People with aphasia demonstrate impaired production of bound inflectional morphemes, such as noun plurals and possession. They often show greater difficulty in marking possession versus plurality. Using a new tool for eliciting language, the Morphosyntactic Generation test, we assessed people with primary progressive aphasia and those in the acute and chronic phase following left hemisphere stroke. Clinical profiles were associated with different strengths and weaknesses in language production. Performance of the plural was stronger than possessive in group analyses. However, some individuals demonstrated the inverse pattern of performance. These participants provide counter-evidence to the theory that difficulty with marking possessives is purely the result of their greater cognitive-linguistic complexity and support a functional double dissociation between possessives and plurals. The deficits resulted from morphosyntactic impairment. Future work is needed to understand why plural and possessive markers were differently sensitive to neurological disorders of language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"116-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855872/pdf/nihms-1641103.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2020.1833851\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2020.1833851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

失语症患者在产生名词复数和占有等限定性词素时表现出障碍。他们通常在标记占有和复数时表现出更大的困难。我们使用一种新的语言诱导工具--语素生成测试,对原发性进行性失语症患者以及左半球中风后急性期和慢性期患者进行了评估。临床特征与语言生成的强弱不同有关。在群体分析中,复数的表现强于所有格。不过,也有一些人的表现与之相反。这些受试者反证了标记属格困难纯粹是认知语言复杂性较高所致的理论,并支持属格和复数之间的功能性双重分离。这些缺陷是由形态句法障碍造成的。要了解复数和所有格标记对神经性语言障碍的敏感性为何不同,还需要今后的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A double dissociation between plural and possessive "s": Evidence from the Morphosyntactic Generation test.

People with aphasia demonstrate impaired production of bound inflectional morphemes, such as noun plurals and possession. They often show greater difficulty in marking possession versus plurality. Using a new tool for eliciting language, the Morphosyntactic Generation test, we assessed people with primary progressive aphasia and those in the acute and chronic phase following left hemisphere stroke. Clinical profiles were associated with different strengths and weaknesses in language production. Performance of the plural was stronger than possessive in group analyses. However, some individuals demonstrated the inverse pattern of performance. These participants provide counter-evidence to the theory that difficulty with marking possessives is purely the result of their greater cognitive-linguistic complexity and support a functional double dissociation between possessives and plurals. The deficits resulted from morphosyntactic impairment. Future work is needed to understand why plural and possessive markers were differently sensitive to neurological disorders of language.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信