对患者至关重要的数字措施:指导健康数字措施选择和发展的框架。

Q1 Computer Science
Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2020-09-15 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000509725
Christine Manta, Bray Patrick-Lake, Jennifer C Goldsack
{"title":"对患者至关重要的数字措施:指导健康数字措施选择和发展的框架。","authors":"Christine Manta,&nbsp;Bray Patrick-Lake,&nbsp;Jennifer C Goldsack","doi":"10.1159/000509725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rise of connected sensor technologies, there are seemingly endless possibilities for new ways to measure health. These technologies offer researchers and clinicians opportunities to go beyond brief snapshots of data captured by traditional in-clinic assessments, to redefine health and disease. Given the myriad opportunities for measurement, how do research or clinical teams know what they <i>should</i> be measuring? Patient engagement, early and often, is paramount to thoughtfully selecting what is most important. Regulators encourage stakeholders to have a patient focus but actionable steps for continuous engagement are not well defined. Without patient-focused measurement, stakeholders risk entrenching digital versions of poor traditional assessments and proliferating low-value tools that are ineffective, burdensome, and reduce both quality and efficiency in clinical care and research.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This article synthesizes and defines a sequential framework of core principles for selecting and developing measurements in research and clinical care that are meaningful for patients. We propose next steps to drive forward the science of high-quality patient engagement in support of measures of health that matter in the era of digital medicine.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>All measures of health should be meaningful, regardless of the product's regulatory classification, type of measure, or context of use. To evaluate meaningfulness of signals derived from digital sensors, the following four-level framework is useful: Meaningful Aspect of Health, Concept of Interest, Outcome to be measured, and Endpoint (exclusive to research). Incorporating patient input is a dynamic process that requires more than a single, transactional touch point but rather should be conducted continuously throughout the measurement selection process. We recommend that developers, clinicians, and researchers reevaluate processes for more continuous patient engagement in the development, deployment, and interpretation of digital measures of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"4 3","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000509725","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Measures That Matter to Patients: A Framework to Guide the Selection and Development of Digital Measures of Health.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Manta,&nbsp;Bray Patrick-Lake,&nbsp;Jennifer C Goldsack\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000509725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rise of connected sensor technologies, there are seemingly endless possibilities for new ways to measure health. These technologies offer researchers and clinicians opportunities to go beyond brief snapshots of data captured by traditional in-clinic assessments, to redefine health and disease. Given the myriad opportunities for measurement, how do research or clinical teams know what they <i>should</i> be measuring? Patient engagement, early and often, is paramount to thoughtfully selecting what is most important. Regulators encourage stakeholders to have a patient focus but actionable steps for continuous engagement are not well defined. Without patient-focused measurement, stakeholders risk entrenching digital versions of poor traditional assessments and proliferating low-value tools that are ineffective, burdensome, and reduce both quality and efficiency in clinical care and research.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This article synthesizes and defines a sequential framework of core principles for selecting and developing measurements in research and clinical care that are meaningful for patients. We propose next steps to drive forward the science of high-quality patient engagement in support of measures of health that matter in the era of digital medicine.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>All measures of health should be meaningful, regardless of the product's regulatory classification, type of measure, or context of use. To evaluate meaningfulness of signals derived from digital sensors, the following four-level framework is useful: Meaningful Aspect of Health, Concept of Interest, Outcome to be measured, and Endpoint (exclusive to research). Incorporating patient input is a dynamic process that requires more than a single, transactional touch point but rather should be conducted continuously throughout the measurement selection process. We recommend that developers, clinicians, and researchers reevaluate processes for more continuous patient engagement in the development, deployment, and interpretation of digital measures of health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"69-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000509725\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000509725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000509725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

背景:随着连接传感器技术的兴起,衡量健康的新方法似乎有无限的可能性。这些技术为研究人员和临床医生提供了超越传统临床评估所获得的数据快照的机会,从而重新定义健康和疾病。考虑到测量的无数机会,研究或临床团队如何知道他们应该测量什么?病人的参与,尽早和经常,对于深思熟虑地选择什么是最重要的是至关重要的。监管机构鼓励利益相关者耐心关注,但持续参与的可操作步骤并没有很好地定义。如果没有以患者为中心的测量,利益攸关方就有可能巩固劣质传统评估的数字版本,并大量使用低价值工具,这些工具效率低下、负担沉重,并降低临床护理和研究的质量和效率。摘要:本文综合并定义了在研究和临床护理中选择和开发对患者有意义的测量方法的核心原则的顺序框架。我们提出下一步措施,推动高质量患者参与科学,以支持数字医学时代重要的健康措施。关键信息:所有健康措施都应该是有意义的,无论产品的监管分类、措施类型或使用环境如何。为了评估来自数字传感器的信号的意义,以下四个层次的框架是有用的:健康的有意义方面,感兴趣的概念,要测量的结果和终点(仅限研究)。纳入患者输入是一个动态过程,需要多个单一的事务性接触点,而应在整个测量选择过程中连续进行。我们建议开发人员、临床医生和研究人员重新评估流程,以使患者更持续地参与健康数字测量的开发、部署和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Measures That Matter to Patients: A Framework to Guide the Selection and Development of Digital Measures of Health.

Background: With the rise of connected sensor technologies, there are seemingly endless possibilities for new ways to measure health. These technologies offer researchers and clinicians opportunities to go beyond brief snapshots of data captured by traditional in-clinic assessments, to redefine health and disease. Given the myriad opportunities for measurement, how do research or clinical teams know what they should be measuring? Patient engagement, early and often, is paramount to thoughtfully selecting what is most important. Regulators encourage stakeholders to have a patient focus but actionable steps for continuous engagement are not well defined. Without patient-focused measurement, stakeholders risk entrenching digital versions of poor traditional assessments and proliferating low-value tools that are ineffective, burdensome, and reduce both quality and efficiency in clinical care and research.

Summary: This article synthesizes and defines a sequential framework of core principles for selecting and developing measurements in research and clinical care that are meaningful for patients. We propose next steps to drive forward the science of high-quality patient engagement in support of measures of health that matter in the era of digital medicine.

Key messages: All measures of health should be meaningful, regardless of the product's regulatory classification, type of measure, or context of use. To evaluate meaningfulness of signals derived from digital sensors, the following four-level framework is useful: Meaningful Aspect of Health, Concept of Interest, Outcome to be measured, and Endpoint (exclusive to research). Incorporating patient input is a dynamic process that requires more than a single, transactional touch point but rather should be conducted continuously throughout the measurement selection process. We recommend that developers, clinicians, and researchers reevaluate processes for more continuous patient engagement in the development, deployment, and interpretation of digital measures of health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信