甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑预防原发性免疫缺乏症患者骨髓抑制回顾性、三组比较研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Reem Elajez, Sabha Nisar, Mehdi Adeli
{"title":"甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑预防原发性免疫缺乏症患者骨髓抑制回顾性、三组比较研究。","authors":"Reem Elajez, Sabha Nisar, Mehdi Adeli","doi":"10.12932/AP-050320-0782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The possible myelosuppression side effect of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on primary immune deficiency (PID) patients has not been established yet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify if the PID patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to the use of TMPSMX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, three groups study, of PID patients (on and off TMP-SMX prophylaxis) and urinary tract infection (UTI) patients received prophylaxis TMP-SMX. Data about CBC results (WBC, ANC, Lymphocytes, RBC, Hemoglobin, and Platelet counts) at baseline, first, and maximum myelosuppression observed during the period of TMP-SMX administration were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients were included in this study (41 PID patients on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, 45 PID patients not on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 36 UTI patients on prophylaxis TMP-SMX). There are significant differences noticed in the percentage of patients who developed clinical myelosuppression (i.e. less than normal value for age) in ANC (39.0% vs. 8.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), RBC (36.6% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.014), WBC (41.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.003), and platelet (24.4% vs. 15.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028) in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant difference in myelosuppression between the groups was most likely due to the combination of TMP-SMX effect on PID patients rather than the disease or the drug itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to TMP-SMX prophylaxis (especially ANC) comparing to immune-competent patients or other PID patients who did not receive prophylactic TMP-SMX. Future larger prospective study is required to confirm this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":"353-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis induce myelosuppression in primary immune deficiency disease patients; A retrospective, 3 groups comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Reem Elajez, Sabha Nisar, Mehdi Adeli\",\"doi\":\"10.12932/AP-050320-0782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The possible myelosuppression side effect of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on primary immune deficiency (PID) patients has not been established yet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify if the PID patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to the use of TMPSMX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, three groups study, of PID patients (on and off TMP-SMX prophylaxis) and urinary tract infection (UTI) patients received prophylaxis TMP-SMX. Data about CBC results (WBC, ANC, Lymphocytes, RBC, Hemoglobin, and Platelet counts) at baseline, first, and maximum myelosuppression observed during the period of TMP-SMX administration were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients were included in this study (41 PID patients on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, 45 PID patients not on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 36 UTI patients on prophylaxis TMP-SMX). There are significant differences noticed in the percentage of patients who developed clinical myelosuppression (i.e. less than normal value for age) in ANC (39.0% vs. 8.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), RBC (36.6% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.014), WBC (41.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.003), and platelet (24.4% vs. 15.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028) in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant difference in myelosuppression between the groups was most likely due to the combination of TMP-SMX effect on PID patients rather than the disease or the drug itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to TMP-SMX prophylaxis (especially ANC) comparing to immune-competent patients or other PID patients who did not receive prophylactic TMP-SMX. Future larger prospective study is required to confirm this association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"353-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-050320-0782\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-050320-0782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)对原发性免疫缺陷(PID)患者可能产生的骨髓抑制副作用尚未确定。目的:确定使用TMPSMX后,PID患者发生骨髓抑制的风险是否更高。方法:回顾性研究,三组PID患者(使用和不使用TMP-SMX预防)和尿路感染(UTI)患者接受TMP-SMX预防。首先收集基线时的CBC结果(WBC、ANC、淋巴细胞、RBC、血红蛋白和血小板计数)数据,以及在给药期间观察到的最大骨髓抑制数据。结果:本研究共纳入122例患者,其中41例盆腔炎患者采用TMP-SMX预防,45例盆腔炎患者未采用TMP-SMX预防,36例UTI患者采用TMP-SMX预防。在1组、2组和3组中,出现临床骨髓抑制(即低于年龄正常值)的患者比例分别为ANC(39.0%比8.9%比16.7%,p = 0.002)、RBC(36.6%比13.3%比13.9%,p = 0.014)、WBC(41.5%比13.3%比13.9%,p = 0.003)和血小板(24.4%比15.6%比2.8%,p = 0.028),差异有统计学意义。两组间骨髓抑制的显著差异最有可能是由于TMP-SMX对PID患者的联合作用,而不是疾病或药物本身。结论:与免疫正常的患者或未接受预防性TMP-SMX的其他原发性免疫缺陷(PID)患者相比,原发性免疫缺陷(PID)患者继发于TMP-SMX预防(尤其是ANC)的骨髓抑制风险更高。需要未来更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis induce myelosuppression in primary immune deficiency disease patients; A retrospective, 3 groups comparative study.

Background: The possible myelosuppression side effect of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on primary immune deficiency (PID) patients has not been established yet.

Objective: Identify if the PID patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to the use of TMPSMX.

Methods: Retrospective, three groups study, of PID patients (on and off TMP-SMX prophylaxis) and urinary tract infection (UTI) patients received prophylaxis TMP-SMX. Data about CBC results (WBC, ANC, Lymphocytes, RBC, Hemoglobin, and Platelet counts) at baseline, first, and maximum myelosuppression observed during the period of TMP-SMX administration were collected.

Results: A total of 122 patients were included in this study (41 PID patients on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, 45 PID patients not on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 36 UTI patients on prophylaxis TMP-SMX). There are significant differences noticed in the percentage of patients who developed clinical myelosuppression (i.e. less than normal value for age) in ANC (39.0% vs. 8.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), RBC (36.6% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.014), WBC (41.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.003), and platelet (24.4% vs. 15.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028) in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant difference in myelosuppression between the groups was most likely due to the combination of TMP-SMX effect on PID patients rather than the disease or the drug itself.

Conclusions: Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to TMP-SMX prophylaxis (especially ANC) comparing to immune-competent patients or other PID patients who did not receive prophylactic TMP-SMX. Future larger prospective study is required to confirm this association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信