随机效应的终身辐射风险。空间飞行或医学的前瞻性评价。

Annals of the ICRP Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-15 DOI:10.1177/0146645320956517
A Ulanowski, J C Kaiser, U Schneider, L Walsh
{"title":"随机效应的终身辐射风险。空间飞行或医学的前瞻性评价。","authors":"A Ulanowski,&nbsp;J C Kaiser,&nbsp;U Schneider,&nbsp;L Walsh","doi":"10.1177/0146645320956517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of lifetime radiation risk of stochastic detrimental health outcomes is important in contemporary radiation protection, being used either to calculate detriment-weighted effective dose or to express risks following radiation accidents or medical uses of radiation. The conventionally applied time-integrated risks of radiation exposure are computed using average values of current population and health statistical data that need to be projected far into the future. By definition, the lifetime attributable risk (AR) is an approximation to more general lifetime risk quantities and is only valid for exposures under 1 Gy. The more general quantities, such as excess lifetime risk (ELR) and risk of exposure-induced cancer, are free of dose range constraints, but rely on assumptions concerning the unknown total radiation effect on demographic and health statistical data, and are more computationally complex than AR. Consideration of highly uncertain competing risks for other radiation-attributed outcomes are required in appropriate assessments of time-integrated risks of specific outcomes following high-dose (>1 Gy) exposures, causing non-linear dose responses in the resulting ELR estimate.Being based on the current population and health statistical data, the conventionally applied time-integrated risks of radiation exposure are: (i) not well suited for projections many years into the future because of the large uncertainties in future secular trends in the population-specific disease rates; and (ii) not optimal for application to atypical groups of exposed persons not well represented by the general population. Specifically, medical patients are atypical in this respect because their prospective risks depend strongly on the original diagnosis, the treatment modality, general cure rates, individual radiation sensitivity, and genetic predisposition. Another situation challenging the application of conventional risk quantities is a projection of occupational radiation risks associated with space flight, both due to higher radiation doses and astronauts' generally excellent health condition due to pre-selection, training, and intensive medical screening.An alternative quantity, named 'radiation-attributed decrease of survival' (RADS), known in past general statistical literature as 'cumulative risk', is recommended here for applications in space and medicine to represent the cumulative radiation risk conditional on survival until a certain age. RADS is only based on the radiation-attributed hazard rendering an insensitivity to competing risks or projections of current population statistics far into the future. Therefore, RADS is highly suitable for assessing semi-personalised radiation risks after radiation exposures from space missions or medical applications of radiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39551,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the ICRP","volume":"49 1_suppl","pages":"200-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146645320956517","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifetime radiation risk of stochastic effects - prospective evaluation for space flight or medicine.\",\"authors\":\"A Ulanowski,&nbsp;J C Kaiser,&nbsp;U Schneider,&nbsp;L Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0146645320956517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of lifetime radiation risk of stochastic detrimental health outcomes is important in contemporary radiation protection, being used either to calculate detriment-weighted effective dose or to express risks following radiation accidents or medical uses of radiation. The conventionally applied time-integrated risks of radiation exposure are computed using average values of current population and health statistical data that need to be projected far into the future. By definition, the lifetime attributable risk (AR) is an approximation to more general lifetime risk quantities and is only valid for exposures under 1 Gy. The more general quantities, such as excess lifetime risk (ELR) and risk of exposure-induced cancer, are free of dose range constraints, but rely on assumptions concerning the unknown total radiation effect on demographic and health statistical data, and are more computationally complex than AR. Consideration of highly uncertain competing risks for other radiation-attributed outcomes are required in appropriate assessments of time-integrated risks of specific outcomes following high-dose (>1 Gy) exposures, causing non-linear dose responses in the resulting ELR estimate.Being based on the current population and health statistical data, the conventionally applied time-integrated risks of radiation exposure are: (i) not well suited for projections many years into the future because of the large uncertainties in future secular trends in the population-specific disease rates; and (ii) not optimal for application to atypical groups of exposed persons not well represented by the general population. Specifically, medical patients are atypical in this respect because their prospective risks depend strongly on the original diagnosis, the treatment modality, general cure rates, individual radiation sensitivity, and genetic predisposition. Another situation challenging the application of conventional risk quantities is a projection of occupational radiation risks associated with space flight, both due to higher radiation doses and astronauts' generally excellent health condition due to pre-selection, training, and intensive medical screening.An alternative quantity, named 'radiation-attributed decrease of survival' (RADS), known in past general statistical literature as 'cumulative risk', is recommended here for applications in space and medicine to represent the cumulative radiation risk conditional on survival until a certain age. RADS is only based on the radiation-attributed hazard rendering an insensitivity to competing risks or projections of current population statistics far into the future. Therefore, RADS is highly suitable for assessing semi-personalised radiation risks after radiation exposures from space missions or medical applications of radiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the ICRP\",\"volume\":\"49 1_suppl\",\"pages\":\"200-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146645320956517\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the ICRP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645320956517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the ICRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645320956517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

随机有害健康后果的终生辐射风险概念在当代辐射防护中很重要,可用于计算有害加权有效剂量,或表示辐射事故或辐射医疗用途后的风险。传统应用的辐射暴露的时间积分风险是使用当前人口和健康统计数据的平均值计算的,这些数据需要预测到遥远的未来。根据定义,终生归因风险(AR)是更一般的终生风险量的近似值,仅适用于1 Gy以下的暴露。较一般的数量,如超额终身风险和照射诱发癌症的风险,不受剂量范围限制,但依赖于关于未知总辐射对人口和健康统计数据的影响的假设。在适当评估高剂量(>1 Gy)照射后特定结果的时间积分风险时,需要考虑其他辐射归因结果的高度不确定竞争风险,从而在所得的ELR估计中引起非线性剂量反应。基于当前人口和健康统计数据,传统应用的时间综合辐射风险:(i)不太适合用于未来许多年的预测,因为特定人群疾病发病率的未来长期趋势存在很大的不确定性;(ii)不适用于一般人群中不能很好代表的非典型暴露人群。具体来说,医疗病人在这方面是不典型的,因为他们的预期风险在很大程度上取决于最初的诊断、治疗方式、一般治愈率、个人辐射敏感性和遗传易感性。对传统风险量的应用提出挑战的另一个情况是对与空间飞行有关的职业辐射风险的预测,这一方面是由于辐射剂量较高,另一方面是由于预选、培训和密集的医疗筛查,宇航员的健康状况总体上很好。这里建议在空间和医学应用中使用另一种称为“辐射导致的生存减少”(RADS)的量,在过去的一般统计文献中称为“累积风险”,以表示以生存到一定年龄为条件的累积辐射风险。RADS仅基于辐射造成的危害,对相互竞争的风险不敏感,或对当前人口统计对未来的预测不敏感。因此,RADS非常适合于评估空间任务或辐射医疗应用造成的辐射照射后的半个体化辐射风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lifetime radiation risk of stochastic effects - prospective evaluation for space flight or medicine.

The concept of lifetime radiation risk of stochastic detrimental health outcomes is important in contemporary radiation protection, being used either to calculate detriment-weighted effective dose or to express risks following radiation accidents or medical uses of radiation. The conventionally applied time-integrated risks of radiation exposure are computed using average values of current population and health statistical data that need to be projected far into the future. By definition, the lifetime attributable risk (AR) is an approximation to more general lifetime risk quantities and is only valid for exposures under 1 Gy. The more general quantities, such as excess lifetime risk (ELR) and risk of exposure-induced cancer, are free of dose range constraints, but rely on assumptions concerning the unknown total radiation effect on demographic and health statistical data, and are more computationally complex than AR. Consideration of highly uncertain competing risks for other radiation-attributed outcomes are required in appropriate assessments of time-integrated risks of specific outcomes following high-dose (>1 Gy) exposures, causing non-linear dose responses in the resulting ELR estimate.Being based on the current population and health statistical data, the conventionally applied time-integrated risks of radiation exposure are: (i) not well suited for projections many years into the future because of the large uncertainties in future secular trends in the population-specific disease rates; and (ii) not optimal for application to atypical groups of exposed persons not well represented by the general population. Specifically, medical patients are atypical in this respect because their prospective risks depend strongly on the original diagnosis, the treatment modality, general cure rates, individual radiation sensitivity, and genetic predisposition. Another situation challenging the application of conventional risk quantities is a projection of occupational radiation risks associated with space flight, both due to higher radiation doses and astronauts' generally excellent health condition due to pre-selection, training, and intensive medical screening.An alternative quantity, named 'radiation-attributed decrease of survival' (RADS), known in past general statistical literature as 'cumulative risk', is recommended here for applications in space and medicine to represent the cumulative radiation risk conditional on survival until a certain age. RADS is only based on the radiation-attributed hazard rendering an insensitivity to competing risks or projections of current population statistics far into the future. Therefore, RADS is highly suitable for assessing semi-personalised radiation risks after radiation exposures from space missions or medical applications of radiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the ICRP
Annals of the ICRP Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The International Commission on Radiological Protection was founded in 1928 to advance for the public benefit the science of radiological protection. The ICRP provides recommendations and guidance on protection against the risks associated with ionising radiation, from artificial sources as widely used in medicine, general industry and nuclear enterprises, and from naturally occurring sources. These reports and recommendations are published six times each year on behalf of the ICRP as the journal Annals of the ICRP. Each issue provides in-depth coverage of a specific subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信