用于监测糖尿病足感染严重程度和治疗的红外热成像技术。

Vascular biology (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2020-07-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1530/VB-20-0003
Kor H Hutting, Wouter B Aan de Stegge, Rombout R Kruse, Jeff G van Baal, Sicco A Bus, Jaap J van Netten
{"title":"用于监测糖尿病足感染严重程度和治疗的红外热成像技术。","authors":"Kor H Hutting, Wouter B Aan de Stegge, Rombout R Kruse, Jeff G van Baal, Sicco A Bus, Jaap J van Netten","doi":"10.1530/VB-20-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring of diabetic foot infections is largely based on clinical assessment, which is limited by moderate reliability. We conducted a prospective study to explore monitoring of thermal asymmetry (difference between mean plantar temperature of the affected and unaffected foot) for the assessment of severity of diabetic foot infections. In patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot infection-grades 3 or 4) we measured thermal asymmetry with an advanced infrared thermography setup during the first 4-5 days of in-hospital treatment, in addition to clinical assessments and tests of serum inflammatory markers (white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels). We assessed the change in thermal asymmetry from baseline to final assessment, and investigated its association with infection-grades and serum inflammatory markers. In seven included patients, thermal asymmetry decreased from median 1.8°C (range: -0.6 to 8.4) at baseline to 1.5°C (range: -0.1 to 5.1) at final assessment (<i>P</i> = 0.515). In three patients who improved to infection-grade 2, thermal asymmetry at baseline (median 1.6°C (range: -0.6 to 1.6)) and final assessment (1.5°C (range: 0.4 to 5.1)) remained similar (<i>P</i> = 0.302). In four patients who did not improve to infection-grade 2, thermal asymmetry decreased from median 4.3°C (range: 1.8 to 8.4) to 1.9°C (range: -0.1 to 4.4<i>; P</i> = 0.221). No correlations were found between thermal asymmetry and infection-grades (<i>r</i> = -0.347; <i>P</i> = 0.445), CRP-levels (<i>r</i> = 0.321; <i>P</i> = 0.482) or WBC (<i>r</i> = -0.250; <i>P</i> = 0.589) during the first 4-5 days of hospitalization. Based on these explorative findings we suggest that infrared thermography is of no value for monitoring diabetic foot infections during in-hospital treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75294,"journal":{"name":"Vascular biology (Bristol, England)","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/aa/VB-20-0003.PMC7487596.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrared thermography for monitoring severity and treatment of diabetic foot infections.\",\"authors\":\"Kor H Hutting, Wouter B Aan de Stegge, Rombout R Kruse, Jeff G van Baal, Sicco A Bus, Jaap J van Netten\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/VB-20-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monitoring of diabetic foot infections is largely based on clinical assessment, which is limited by moderate reliability. We conducted a prospective study to explore monitoring of thermal asymmetry (difference between mean plantar temperature of the affected and unaffected foot) for the assessment of severity of diabetic foot infections. In patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot infection-grades 3 or 4) we measured thermal asymmetry with an advanced infrared thermography setup during the first 4-5 days of in-hospital treatment, in addition to clinical assessments and tests of serum inflammatory markers (white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels). We assessed the change in thermal asymmetry from baseline to final assessment, and investigated its association with infection-grades and serum inflammatory markers. In seven included patients, thermal asymmetry decreased from median 1.8°C (range: -0.6 to 8.4) at baseline to 1.5°C (range: -0.1 to 5.1) at final assessment (<i>P</i> = 0.515). In three patients who improved to infection-grade 2, thermal asymmetry at baseline (median 1.6°C (range: -0.6 to 1.6)) and final assessment (1.5°C (range: 0.4 to 5.1)) remained similar (<i>P</i> = 0.302). In four patients who did not improve to infection-grade 2, thermal asymmetry decreased from median 4.3°C (range: 1.8 to 8.4) to 1.9°C (range: -0.1 to 4.4<i>; P</i> = 0.221). No correlations were found between thermal asymmetry and infection-grades (<i>r</i> = -0.347; <i>P</i> = 0.445), CRP-levels (<i>r</i> = 0.321; <i>P</i> = 0.482) or WBC (<i>r</i> = -0.250; <i>P</i> = 0.589) during the first 4-5 days of hospitalization. Based on these explorative findings we suggest that infrared thermography is of no value for monitoring diabetic foot infections during in-hospital treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular biology (Bristol, England)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/aa/VB-20-0003.PMC7487596.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular biology (Bristol, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/VB-20-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular biology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/VB-20-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病足感染的监测主要基于临床评估,而临床评估的可靠性一般。我们开展了一项前瞻性研究,探索通过监测热不对称(患足和未患足的平均足底温度差)来评估糖尿病足感染的严重程度。对于中度或重度糖尿病足感染患者(国际糖尿病足感染工作组分级为 3 级或 4 级),除了临床评估和血清炎症指标(白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白水平)检测外,我们还在院内治疗的头 4-5 天使用先进的红外热成像装置测量了热不对称性。我们评估了热不对称从基线到最终评估的变化,并研究了其与感染分级和血清炎症指标的关联。在纳入的七名患者中,热不对称性从基线时的中位数 1.8°C(范围:-0.6 至 8.4)降至最终评估时的 1.5°C(范围:-0.1 至 5.1)(P = 0.515)。在三名病情好转至感染等级 2 的患者中,基线(中位数为 1.6°C(范围:-0.6 至 1.6))和最终评估(1.5°C(范围:0.4 至 5.1))时的热不对称性仍然相似(P = 0.302)。在四名没有改善到感染等级 2 的患者中,热不对称性从中位数 4.3°C (范围:1.8 至 8.4)降至 1.9°C(范围:-0.1 至 4.4;P = 0.221)。在住院的最初 4-5 天内,热不对称与感染等级(r = -0.347;P = 0.445)、CRP 水平(r = 0.321;P = 0.482)或白细胞(r = -0.250;P = 0.589)之间没有相关性。基于这些探索性发现,我们认为红外热成像技术对于在住院治疗期间监测糖尿病足感染没有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Infrared thermography for monitoring severity and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Infrared thermography for monitoring severity and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Infrared thermography for monitoring severity and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Infrared thermography for monitoring severity and treatment of diabetic foot infections.

Monitoring of diabetic foot infections is largely based on clinical assessment, which is limited by moderate reliability. We conducted a prospective study to explore monitoring of thermal asymmetry (difference between mean plantar temperature of the affected and unaffected foot) for the assessment of severity of diabetic foot infections. In patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot infection-grades 3 or 4) we measured thermal asymmetry with an advanced infrared thermography setup during the first 4-5 days of in-hospital treatment, in addition to clinical assessments and tests of serum inflammatory markers (white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels). We assessed the change in thermal asymmetry from baseline to final assessment, and investigated its association with infection-grades and serum inflammatory markers. In seven included patients, thermal asymmetry decreased from median 1.8°C (range: -0.6 to 8.4) at baseline to 1.5°C (range: -0.1 to 5.1) at final assessment (P = 0.515). In three patients who improved to infection-grade 2, thermal asymmetry at baseline (median 1.6°C (range: -0.6 to 1.6)) and final assessment (1.5°C (range: 0.4 to 5.1)) remained similar (P = 0.302). In four patients who did not improve to infection-grade 2, thermal asymmetry decreased from median 4.3°C (range: 1.8 to 8.4) to 1.9°C (range: -0.1 to 4.4; P = 0.221). No correlations were found between thermal asymmetry and infection-grades (r = -0.347; P = 0.445), CRP-levels (r = 0.321; P = 0.482) or WBC (r = -0.250; P = 0.589) during the first 4-5 days of hospitalization. Based on these explorative findings we suggest that infrared thermography is of no value for monitoring diabetic foot infections during in-hospital treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信