苯二氮卓类药物:是时候回到证据上来了。

Edward Silberman, Richard Balon, Vladan Starcevic, Richard Shader, Fiammetta Cosci, Giovanni A Fava, Antonio E Nardi, Carl Salzman, Nicoletta Sonino
{"title":"苯二氮卓类药物:是时候回到证据上来了。","authors":"Edward Silberman, Richard Balon, Vladan Starcevic, Richard Shader, Fiammetta Cosci, Giovanni A Fava, Antonio E Nardi, Carl Salzman, Nicoletta Sonino","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2020.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary We propose that discussions of benzodiazepines in the current psychiatric literature have become negatively biased and have strayed from the scientific evidence base. We advocate returning to the evidence in discussing benzodiazepines and adhering to clear definitions and conceptual rigour in commentary about them.","PeriodicalId":520791,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","volume":" ","pages":"125-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/bjp.2020.164","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benzodiazepines: it's time to return to the evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Edward Silberman, Richard Balon, Vladan Starcevic, Richard Shader, Fiammetta Cosci, Giovanni A Fava, Antonio E Nardi, Carl Salzman, Nicoletta Sonino\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2020.164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary We propose that discussions of benzodiazepines in the current psychiatric literature have become negatively biased and have strayed from the scientific evidence base. We advocate returning to the evidence in discussing benzodiazepines and adhering to clear definitions and conceptual rigour in commentary about them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":520791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"125-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/bjp.2020.164\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

摘要:我们认为,目前精神病学文献中关于苯二氮卓类药物的讨论已经变得消极偏颇,偏离了科学证据基础。我们主张在讨论苯二氮卓类药物时回归证据,在评论它们时坚持明确的定义和概念上的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benzodiazepines: it's time to return to the evidence.
Summary We propose that discussions of benzodiazepines in the current psychiatric literature have become negatively biased and have strayed from the scientific evidence base. We advocate returning to the evidence in discussing benzodiazepines and adhering to clear definitions and conceptual rigour in commentary about them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信