地中海地区工作幸福感和尊重人权问卷(WWRRR)的主成分分析。

Q2 Medicine
Mathilde Husky, Yosra Zgueb, Uta Ouali, Cesar I A Gonzalez, Martina Piras, Giorgia Testa, Alberto Maleci, Alfredo Mulas, Alessandro Montisci, Samih Nujedat, Goce Kalcev, Iskren Teodorov, Antonio Preti, Matthias Angermeyer, Mauro Giovanni Carta
{"title":"地中海地区工作幸福感和尊重人权问卷(WWRRR)的主成分分析。","authors":"Mathilde Husky,&nbsp;Yosra Zgueb,&nbsp;Uta Ouali,&nbsp;Cesar I A Gonzalez,&nbsp;Martina Piras,&nbsp;Giorgia Testa,&nbsp;Alberto Maleci,&nbsp;Alfredo Mulas,&nbsp;Alessandro Montisci,&nbsp;Samih Nujedat,&nbsp;Goce Kalcev,&nbsp;Iskren Teodorov,&nbsp;Antonio Preti,&nbsp;Matthias Angermeyer,&nbsp;Mauro Giovanni Carta","doi":"10.2174/1745017902016010115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Well-Being at Work and Respect for human Rights Questionnaire (WWRR) was conceived based on the hypothesis that the perception of respect for users' rights is an essential element of well-being in the workplace in healthcare. The objective of the study is to examine the principal components of the WWRR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample representative of a set of professionals working in three different healthcare networks in Tunisia, North-Macedonia, and Italy was enrolled (n=426). Each professional completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the WWRR. The WWRR consists of six items on beliefs about: satisfaction at work, users' satisfaction, organization at work, respect of users' and staff human rights, adequacy of resources. A seventh item assesses the perceived needs of personnel. Correlation between the items was evaluated by analysing the principal components with Varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (which included all components with an Eigen value> 1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A single factor covered over 50% of the variance, all the items of the questionnaire were closely related and compose a single factor. Tunisia presented some differences regarding the item about the human rights of staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfaction with the respect for the rights of users is strongly correlated with the other factors that are part of the concept of the organizational well-being of health care providers. The WWRR provides a means of measuring this important and often neglected dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":"16 Suppl-1","pages":"115-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536725/pdf/","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Husky,&nbsp;Yosra Zgueb,&nbsp;Uta Ouali,&nbsp;Cesar I A Gonzalez,&nbsp;Martina Piras,&nbsp;Giorgia Testa,&nbsp;Alberto Maleci,&nbsp;Alfredo Mulas,&nbsp;Alessandro Montisci,&nbsp;Samih Nujedat,&nbsp;Goce Kalcev,&nbsp;Iskren Teodorov,&nbsp;Antonio Preti,&nbsp;Matthias Angermeyer,&nbsp;Mauro Giovanni Carta\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1745017902016010115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Well-Being at Work and Respect for human Rights Questionnaire (WWRR) was conceived based on the hypothesis that the perception of respect for users' rights is an essential element of well-being in the workplace in healthcare. The objective of the study is to examine the principal components of the WWRR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sample representative of a set of professionals working in three different healthcare networks in Tunisia, North-Macedonia, and Italy was enrolled (n=426). Each professional completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the WWRR. The WWRR consists of six items on beliefs about: satisfaction at work, users' satisfaction, organization at work, respect of users' and staff human rights, adequacy of resources. A seventh item assesses the perceived needs of personnel. Correlation between the items was evaluated by analysing the principal components with Varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (which included all components with an Eigen value> 1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A single factor covered over 50% of the variance, all the items of the questionnaire were closely related and compose a single factor. Tunisia presented some differences regarding the item about the human rights of staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfaction with the respect for the rights of users is strongly correlated with the other factors that are part of the concept of the organizational well-being of health care providers. The WWRR provides a means of measuring this important and often neglected dimension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl-1\",\"pages\":\"115-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017902016010115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017902016010115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:工作幸福感和尊重人权问卷(WWRR)是基于这样一个假设,即对用户权利的尊重是医疗保健工作场所幸福感的一个基本要素。这项研究的目的是检查水资源资源量的主要组成部分。方法:在突尼斯、北马其顿和意大利的三个不同的医疗保健网络中随机选取一组具有代表性的专业人员(n=426)。每位专业人员完成了一份关于社会人口统计数据和WWRR的调查问卷。WWRR包括六个信念项目:工作满意度、用户满意度、工作组织、尊重用户和工作人员的人权、资源是否充足。第七个项目评估人员的预期需求。通过Varimax旋转和Kaiser归一化(包括特征值> 1的所有成分)分析主成分之间的相关性,评估项目之间的相关性。结果:单因素覆盖了50%以上的方差,问卷的所有项目密切相关并构成单因素。突尼斯对关于工作人员人权的项目提出了一些不同意见。结论:对尊重用户权利的满意度与卫生保健提供者组织福利概念的其他因素密切相关。WWRR提供了一种测量这一重要且经常被忽视的维度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.

Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.

Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.

Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.

Background: The Well-Being at Work and Respect for human Rights Questionnaire (WWRR) was conceived based on the hypothesis that the perception of respect for users' rights is an essential element of well-being in the workplace in healthcare. The objective of the study is to examine the principal components of the WWRR.

Methods: A random sample representative of a set of professionals working in three different healthcare networks in Tunisia, North-Macedonia, and Italy was enrolled (n=426). Each professional completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the WWRR. The WWRR consists of six items on beliefs about: satisfaction at work, users' satisfaction, organization at work, respect of users' and staff human rights, adequacy of resources. A seventh item assesses the perceived needs of personnel. Correlation between the items was evaluated by analysing the principal components with Varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (which included all components with an Eigen value> 1).

Results: A single factor covered over 50% of the variance, all the items of the questionnaire were closely related and compose a single factor. Tunisia presented some differences regarding the item about the human rights of staff.

Conclusion: Satisfaction with the respect for the rights of users is strongly correlated with the other factors that are part of the concept of the organizational well-being of health care providers. The WWRR provides a means of measuring this important and often neglected dimension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信