突尼斯患者心境障碍问卷的因素结构。

Q2 Medicine
Uta Ouali, Lamia Jouini, Yosra Zgueb, Rabaa Jomli, Adel Omrani, Fethi Nacef, Antonio Preti, Mauro Giovanni Carta
{"title":"突尼斯患者心境障碍问卷的因素结构。","authors":"Uta Ouali,&nbsp;Lamia Jouini,&nbsp;Yosra Zgueb,&nbsp;Rabaa Jomli,&nbsp;Adel Omrani,&nbsp;Fethi Nacef,&nbsp;Antonio Preti,&nbsp;Mauro Giovanni Carta","doi":"10.2174/1745017902016010082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a frequently used screening tool for the early detection of Bipolar Disorder (BD), which is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed at its onset. In this study, data from Tunisia has been used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic MDQ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 151 patients with a current major depressive episode. The Arabic adapted version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR was used to formulate a diagnosis, yielding 62 patients with BD and 89 with unipolar Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Principal component analysis with parallel analysis was used to establish the spontaneous distribution of the 13 core items of the MDQ. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to check the available factor models. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the capacity of the MDQ to distinguish patients with BD from those with MDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's α in the sample was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.75 to 0.85). Ordinal α was 0.88. Parallel analysis suggested two main components, which explained 59% of variance in the data. CFA found a good fit for the existing unidimensional, the two-factor, and the three-factor models. ROC analysis showed that at a threshold of 7, the MDQ was able to distinguish patients with BD from those with MDD with extraordinary negative predictive value (0.92) and a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio of 3.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Arabic version of the MDQ showed good measurement properties in terms of reliability, factorial validity and discriminative properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":"16 Suppl-1","pages":"82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536729/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Factor Structure of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in Tunisian Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Uta Ouali,&nbsp;Lamia Jouini,&nbsp;Yosra Zgueb,&nbsp;Rabaa Jomli,&nbsp;Adel Omrani,&nbsp;Fethi Nacef,&nbsp;Antonio Preti,&nbsp;Mauro Giovanni Carta\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1745017902016010082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a frequently used screening tool for the early detection of Bipolar Disorder (BD), which is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed at its onset. In this study, data from Tunisia has been used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic MDQ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 151 patients with a current major depressive episode. The Arabic adapted version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR was used to formulate a diagnosis, yielding 62 patients with BD and 89 with unipolar Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Principal component analysis with parallel analysis was used to establish the spontaneous distribution of the 13 core items of the MDQ. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to check the available factor models. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the capacity of the MDQ to distinguish patients with BD from those with MDD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's α in the sample was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.75 to 0.85). Ordinal α was 0.88. Parallel analysis suggested two main components, which explained 59% of variance in the data. CFA found a good fit for the existing unidimensional, the two-factor, and the three-factor models. ROC analysis showed that at a threshold of 7, the MDQ was able to distinguish patients with BD from those with MDD with extraordinary negative predictive value (0.92) and a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio of 3.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Arabic version of the MDQ showed good measurement properties in terms of reliability, factorial validity and discriminative properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl-1\",\"pages\":\"82-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017902016010082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017902016010082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:情绪障碍问卷(MDQ)是一种常用的筛查工具,用于早期发现双相情感障碍(BD),在发病时往往未被识别或误诊。在这项研究中,突尼斯的数据被用来评估阿拉伯MDQ的心理测量特性。方法:样本包括151例当前重度抑郁发作的患者。使用阿拉伯语改编版的DSM-IV-TR结构化临床访谈来制定诊断,得出62例双相障碍患者和89例单极重度抑郁症(MDD)患者。采用主成分分析与平行分析相结合的方法,建立了13个核心项目MDQ的自发分布。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于检验可用的因子模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来评估MDQ区分BD患者和MDD患者的能力。结果:样本的Cronbach's α为0.80 (95%CI: 0.75 ~ 0.85)。序数α为0.88。平行分析表明了两个主要组成部分,这解释了数据中59%的方差。CFA发现很适合现有的一维、双因素和三因素模型。ROC分析显示,在阈值为7时,MDQ能够区分BD患者和MDD患者,具有异常阴性预测值(0.92),阳性诊断似然比为3.8。结论:阿拉伯文MDQ量表具有良好的信度、析因效度和判别性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Factor Structure of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in Tunisian Patients.

The Factor Structure of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in Tunisian Patients.

The Factor Structure of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in Tunisian Patients.

The Factor Structure of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in Tunisian Patients.

Background: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a frequently used screening tool for the early detection of Bipolar Disorder (BD), which is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed at its onset. In this study, data from Tunisia has been used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic MDQ.

Methods: The sample included 151 patients with a current major depressive episode. The Arabic adapted version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR was used to formulate a diagnosis, yielding 62 patients with BD and 89 with unipolar Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Principal component analysis with parallel analysis was used to establish the spontaneous distribution of the 13 core items of the MDQ. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to check the available factor models. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the capacity of the MDQ to distinguish patients with BD from those with MDD.

Results: Cronbach's α in the sample was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.75 to 0.85). Ordinal α was 0.88. Parallel analysis suggested two main components, which explained 59% of variance in the data. CFA found a good fit for the existing unidimensional, the two-factor, and the three-factor models. ROC analysis showed that at a threshold of 7, the MDQ was able to distinguish patients with BD from those with MDD with extraordinary negative predictive value (0.92) and a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio of 3.8.

Conclusion: The Arabic version of the MDQ showed good measurement properties in terms of reliability, factorial validity and discriminative properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信