有助于COVID-19管理的移动健康应用程序:范围审查。

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2020-08-06 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2196/20596
Hanson John Leon Singh, Danielle Couch, Kevin Yap
{"title":"有助于COVID-19管理的移动健康应用程序:范围审查。","authors":"Hanson John Leon Singh,&nbsp;Danielle Couch,&nbsp;Kevin Yap","doi":"10.2196/20596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) apps have played an important role in mitigating the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) response. However, there is no resource that provides a holistic picture of the available mHealth apps that have been developed to combat this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim is to scope the evidence base on apps that were developed in response to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews, literature searches were conducted on Google Search, Google Scholar, and PubMed using the country's name as keywords and \"coronavirus,\" \"COVID-19,\" \"nCOV19,\" \"contact tracing,\" \"information providing apps,\" \"symptom tracking,\" \"mobile apps,\" \"mobile applications,\" \"smartphone,\" \"mobile phone,\" and \"mHealth.\" Countries most affected by COVID-19 and those that first rolled out COVID-19-related apps were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 articles were reviewed from 19 countries, resulting in a total of 29 apps. Among them, 15 (52%) apps were on contact tracing, 7 (24%) apps on quarantine, 7 (24%) on symptom monitoring, and 1 (3%) on information provision. More than half (n=20, 69%) were from governmental sources, only 3 (10%) were from private organizations, and 3 (10%) from universities. There were 6 (21%) apps available on either Android or iOS, and 10 (34%) were available on both platforms. Bluetooth was used in 10 (34%) apps for collecting data, 12 (41%) apps used GPS, and 12 (41%) used other forms of data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identifies that the majority of COVID-19 apps were for contact tracing and symptom monitoring. However, these apps are effective only if taken up by the community. The sharing of good practices across different countries can enable governments to learn from each other and develop effective strategies to combat and manage this pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"3 1","pages":"e20596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467120/pdf/","citationCount":"97","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Health Apps That Help With COVID-19 Management: Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hanson John Leon Singh,&nbsp;Danielle Couch,&nbsp;Kevin Yap\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/20596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) apps have played an important role in mitigating the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) response. However, there is no resource that provides a holistic picture of the available mHealth apps that have been developed to combat this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim is to scope the evidence base on apps that were developed in response to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews, literature searches were conducted on Google Search, Google Scholar, and PubMed using the country's name as keywords and \\\"coronavirus,\\\" \\\"COVID-19,\\\" \\\"nCOV19,\\\" \\\"contact tracing,\\\" \\\"information providing apps,\\\" \\\"symptom tracking,\\\" \\\"mobile apps,\\\" \\\"mobile applications,\\\" \\\"smartphone,\\\" \\\"mobile phone,\\\" and \\\"mHealth.\\\" Countries most affected by COVID-19 and those that first rolled out COVID-19-related apps were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 articles were reviewed from 19 countries, resulting in a total of 29 apps. Among them, 15 (52%) apps were on contact tracing, 7 (24%) apps on quarantine, 7 (24%) on symptom monitoring, and 1 (3%) on information provision. More than half (n=20, 69%) were from governmental sources, only 3 (10%) were from private organizations, and 3 (10%) from universities. There were 6 (21%) apps available on either Android or iOS, and 10 (34%) were available on both platforms. Bluetooth was used in 10 (34%) apps for collecting data, 12 (41%) apps used GPS, and 12 (41%) used other forms of data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identifies that the majority of COVID-19 apps were for contact tracing and symptom monitoring. However, these apps are effective only if taken up by the community. The sharing of good practices across different countries can enable governments to learn from each other and develop effective strategies to combat and manage this pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR nursing\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e20596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"97\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/20596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/20596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

摘要

背景:移动健康(mHealth)应用程序在缓解冠状病毒病(COVID-19)应对方面发挥了重要作用。然而,没有任何资源可以提供为对抗这种流行病而开发的可用移动健康应用程序的整体情况。目的:我们的目标是根据为应对COVID-19而开发的应用程序来确定证据范围。方法:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行范围评价,在Google Search、Google Scholar和PubMed上以国家名称作为关键词,以及“冠状病毒”、“COVID-19”、“nCOV19”、“接触者追踪”、“信息提供应用程序”、“症状跟踪”、“移动应用程序”、“智能手机”、“移动电话”和“移动健康”进行文献检索。受COVID-19影响最严重的国家和首次推出与COVID-19相关应用程序的国家也包括在内。结果:共评审了来自19个国家的46篇文章,共评审出29款app。其中,接触者追踪类应用15个(52%),隔离类应用7个(24%),症状监测类应用7个(24%),信息提供类应用1个(3%)。超过一半(n=20, 69%)的人来自政府部门,只有3人(10%)来自民间机构,3人(10%)来自大学。有6款(21%)应用可以同时在Android或iOS上运行,10款(34%)应用可以同时在两个平台上运行。10个(34%)应用程序使用蓝牙收集数据,12个(41%)应用程序使用GPS, 12个(41%)应用程序使用其他形式的数据收集。结论:本综述确定大多数COVID-19应用程序用于接触者追踪和症状监测。然而,这些应用程序只有在被社区采用的情况下才有效。在不同国家之间分享良好做法可以使各国政府相互学习,并制定有效的战略来防治和管理这一流行病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mobile Health Apps That Help With COVID-19 Management: Scoping Review.

Mobile Health Apps That Help With COVID-19 Management: Scoping Review.

Mobile Health Apps That Help With COVID-19 Management: Scoping Review.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps have played an important role in mitigating the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) response. However, there is no resource that provides a holistic picture of the available mHealth apps that have been developed to combat this pandemic.

Objective: Our aim is to scope the evidence base on apps that were developed in response to COVID-19.

Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews, literature searches were conducted on Google Search, Google Scholar, and PubMed using the country's name as keywords and "coronavirus," "COVID-19," "nCOV19," "contact tracing," "information providing apps," "symptom tracking," "mobile apps," "mobile applications," "smartphone," "mobile phone," and "mHealth." Countries most affected by COVID-19 and those that first rolled out COVID-19-related apps were included.

Results: A total of 46 articles were reviewed from 19 countries, resulting in a total of 29 apps. Among them, 15 (52%) apps were on contact tracing, 7 (24%) apps on quarantine, 7 (24%) on symptom monitoring, and 1 (3%) on information provision. More than half (n=20, 69%) were from governmental sources, only 3 (10%) were from private organizations, and 3 (10%) from universities. There were 6 (21%) apps available on either Android or iOS, and 10 (34%) were available on both platforms. Bluetooth was used in 10 (34%) apps for collecting data, 12 (41%) apps used GPS, and 12 (41%) used other forms of data collection.

Conclusions: This review identifies that the majority of COVID-19 apps were for contact tracing and symptom monitoring. However, these apps are effective only if taken up by the community. The sharing of good practices across different countries can enable governments to learn from each other and develop effective strategies to combat and manage this pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信