视野丧失对驾驶技能的影响:一个系统的叙述回顾。

Q3 Medicine
Gemma Patterson, Claire Howard, Lauren Hepworth, Fiona Rowe
{"title":"视野丧失对驾驶技能的影响:一个系统的叙述回顾。","authors":"Gemma Patterson,&nbsp;Claire Howard,&nbsp;Lauren Hepworth,&nbsp;Fiona Rowe","doi":"10.22599/bioj.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the evidence on the impact of visual field loss on skills required for driving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was undertaken using a systematic approach. Papers within scope were identified by two independent reviewers, and papers were grouped into similar themes for discussion.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Evidence suggests that both binocular and monocular visual field defects have a negative impact on driving skills. Both central and peripheral cause difficulties, but the degree of impact is dependent on the defect severity and compensation ability. Many factors that affect compensation to visual field loss and the effects of visual field loss on driving skills are discussed, including cognitive status, age and duration of visual field loss. In summary, in central visual field loss compensation, strategies include reduction of overall driving speed; whereas, in peripheral field loss, increased scanning is reported to aid adaptation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For driving, there is evidence that complete and/or binocular visual field loss poses more of a difficulty than partial and/or monocular loss, and central defects cause more problems than peripheral defects. A lack of evidence exists concerning the impact of superior versus inferior defects. The level of peripheral vision loss that is incompatible with safe driving remains unknown, as compensation abilities vary widely between individuals. This review highlights a lack of evidence in relation to the impact of visual field loss on driving skills. Further research is required to strengthen the evidence to allow clinicians to better support people with visual field loss with driving advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510550/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Visual Field Loss on Driving Skills: A Systematic Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Patterson,&nbsp;Claire Howard,&nbsp;Lauren Hepworth,&nbsp;Fiona Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.22599/bioj.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the evidence on the impact of visual field loss on skills required for driving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was undertaken using a systematic approach. Papers within scope were identified by two independent reviewers, and papers were grouped into similar themes for discussion.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Evidence suggests that both binocular and monocular visual field defects have a negative impact on driving skills. Both central and peripheral cause difficulties, but the degree of impact is dependent on the defect severity and compensation ability. Many factors that affect compensation to visual field loss and the effects of visual field loss on driving skills are discussed, including cognitive status, age and duration of visual field loss. In summary, in central visual field loss compensation, strategies include reduction of overall driving speed; whereas, in peripheral field loss, increased scanning is reported to aid adaptation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For driving, there is evidence that complete and/or binocular visual field loss poses more of a difficulty than partial and/or monocular loss, and central defects cause more problems than peripheral defects. A lack of evidence exists concerning the impact of superior versus inferior defects. The level of peripheral vision loss that is incompatible with safe driving remains unknown, as compensation abilities vary widely between individuals. This review highlights a lack of evidence in relation to the impact of visual field loss on driving skills. Further research is required to strengthen the evidence to allow clinicians to better support people with visual field loss with driving advice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"53-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目的:回顾视野丧失对驾驶技能影响的证据。方法:采用系统的方法进行文献检索。范围内的论文由两名独立审稿人确定,论文被分组到类似的主题中进行讨论。主要发现:有证据表明双眼和单眼视野缺陷对驾驶技能都有负面影响。中枢和外周都会造成困难,但影响的程度取决于缺陷的严重程度和补偿能力。本文讨论了影响视野丧失补偿和视野丧失对驾驶技能影响的诸多因素,包括认知状况、年龄和视野丧失的持续时间。综上所述,在中央视野损失补偿中,策略包括降低整体驾驶速度;然而,在外围场损失中,据报道增加扫描有助于适应。结论:有证据表明,对于驾驶来说,完全和/或双眼视野丧失比部分和/或单眼视野丧失带来更多的困难,中枢缺陷比周围缺陷带来更多的问题。关于优等缺陷与劣等缺陷的影响缺乏证据。与安全驾驶不相容的周边视力丧失水平仍然未知,因为个体之间的补偿能力差异很大。这篇综述强调缺乏与视野丧失对驾驶技能的影响有关的证据。需要进一步的研究来加强证据,使临床医生能够更好地为视力丧失的人提供驾驶建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Impact of Visual Field Loss on Driving Skills: A Systematic Narrative Review.

The Impact of Visual Field Loss on Driving Skills: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Purpose: To review the evidence on the impact of visual field loss on skills required for driving.

Methods: A literature search was undertaken using a systematic approach. Papers within scope were identified by two independent reviewers, and papers were grouped into similar themes for discussion.

Key findings: Evidence suggests that both binocular and monocular visual field defects have a negative impact on driving skills. Both central and peripheral cause difficulties, but the degree of impact is dependent on the defect severity and compensation ability. Many factors that affect compensation to visual field loss and the effects of visual field loss on driving skills are discussed, including cognitive status, age and duration of visual field loss. In summary, in central visual field loss compensation, strategies include reduction of overall driving speed; whereas, in peripheral field loss, increased scanning is reported to aid adaptation.

Conclusions: For driving, there is evidence that complete and/or binocular visual field loss poses more of a difficulty than partial and/or monocular loss, and central defects cause more problems than peripheral defects. A lack of evidence exists concerning the impact of superior versus inferior defects. The level of peripheral vision loss that is incompatible with safe driving remains unknown, as compensation abilities vary widely between individuals. This review highlights a lack of evidence in relation to the impact of visual field loss on driving skills. Further research is required to strengthen the evidence to allow clinicians to better support people with visual field loss with driving advice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信