iphone上的EyeChart应用程序能提供与传统视力表相当的测量结果吗?

Q3 Medicine
Katie Ansell, Gail Maconachie, Anne Bjerre
{"title":"iphone上的EyeChart应用程序能提供与传统视力表相当的测量结果吗?","authors":"Katie Ansell,&nbsp;Gail Maconachie,&nbsp;Anne Bjerre","doi":"10.22599/bioj.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate if the EyeChart app gives accurate visual acuity (VA) measurements that are comparable to those achieved using traditional VA charts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-four participants (aged 18-27 years, mean 20.13 ± 1.78 years) with VA of 6/60 Snellen or better regardless of any strabismus, amblyopia, or ocular pathology volunteered for this prospective study. The best-corrected monocular VA of each participant's right eye was measured on the Snellen chart at 6 m, the ETDRS chart at 3 m, and the EyeChart app presented on an iPhone SE at 1.2 m (4ft).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean VA scores obtained were: -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR on the Snellen chart, -0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR on the ETDRS chart, and -0.09 ± 0.07 logMAR on the EyeChart app. After Bonferroni Correction adjustments were applied, a significant difference was found between the EyeChart app and the Snellen chart (t = -3.756, p = 0.003), however the difference between the EyeChart app and the ETDRS chart did not reach statistical significance (t = -2.391, p = 0.076). The EyeChart app had a strong correlation with both the Snellen (r = 0.79, p < 0.01) and ETDRS charts (r = 0.88, p < 0.01). The Coefficients of Agreement revealed a variation of less than one logMAR line between the EyeChart app and the traditional VA charts (Snellen: 0.09 logMAR; ETDRS: 0.08 logMAR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that the EyeChart app gives accurate VA scores that are comparable to those achieved using the gold-standard ETDRS chart in a healthy young adult population. However, the accuracy and repeatability of the EyeChart app when testing a patient population must be investigated before it can be integrated into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510399/pdf/","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the EyeChart App for iPhones Give Comparable Measurements to Traditional Visual Acuity Charts?\",\"authors\":\"Katie Ansell,&nbsp;Gail Maconachie,&nbsp;Anne Bjerre\",\"doi\":\"10.22599/bioj.146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate if the EyeChart app gives accurate visual acuity (VA) measurements that are comparable to those achieved using traditional VA charts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-four participants (aged 18-27 years, mean 20.13 ± 1.78 years) with VA of 6/60 Snellen or better regardless of any strabismus, amblyopia, or ocular pathology volunteered for this prospective study. The best-corrected monocular VA of each participant's right eye was measured on the Snellen chart at 6 m, the ETDRS chart at 3 m, and the EyeChart app presented on an iPhone SE at 1.2 m (4ft).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean VA scores obtained were: -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR on the Snellen chart, -0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR on the ETDRS chart, and -0.09 ± 0.07 logMAR on the EyeChart app. After Bonferroni Correction adjustments were applied, a significant difference was found between the EyeChart app and the Snellen chart (t = -3.756, p = 0.003), however the difference between the EyeChart app and the ETDRS chart did not reach statistical significance (t = -2.391, p = 0.076). The EyeChart app had a strong correlation with both the Snellen (r = 0.79, p < 0.01) and ETDRS charts (r = 0.88, p < 0.01). The Coefficients of Agreement revealed a variation of less than one logMAR line between the EyeChart app and the traditional VA charts (Snellen: 0.09 logMAR; ETDRS: 0.08 logMAR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that the EyeChart app gives accurate VA scores that are comparable to those achieved using the gold-standard ETDRS chart in a healthy young adult population. However, the accuracy and repeatability of the EyeChart app when testing a patient population must be investigated before it can be integrated into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"19-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:调查EyeChart应用程序是否提供准确的视力(VA)测量,可与使用传统VA图表获得的结果相媲美。方法:24名志愿者(年龄18-27岁,平均20.13±1.78岁),视差为6/60或更高,无论是否有斜视、弱视或眼部病理,均自愿参加本前瞻性研究。在Snellen图上测量每个参与者右眼的最佳单眼矫正VA为6米,ETDRS图为3米,在iPhone SE上显示的EyeChart应用程序为1.2米(4英尺)。结果:获得的VA平均评分为:Snellen图-0.13±0.08 logMAR, ETDRS图-0.11±0.08 logMAR, EyeChart app -0.09±0.07 logMAR。经Bonferroni校正后,EyeChart app与Snellen图差异有统计学意义(t = -3.756, p = 0.003),而EyeChart app与ETDRS图差异无统计学意义(t = -2.391, p = 0.076)。EyeChart应用程序与Snellen图(r = 0.79, p < 0.01)和ETDRS图(r = 0.88, p < 0.01)均有很强的相关性。一致性系数显示,EyeChart应用与传统VA图表之间的logMAR差异小于1条(Snellen: 0.09 logMAR;ETDRS: 0.08 logMAR)。结论:本研究发现,EyeChart应用程序在健康的年轻成年人中提供准确的VA评分,与使用金标准ETDRS图表获得的评分相当。然而,EyeChart应用程序在测试患者群体时的准确性和可重复性必须进行调查,然后才能将其整合到临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does the EyeChart App for iPhones Give Comparable Measurements to Traditional Visual Acuity Charts?

Does the EyeChart App for iPhones Give Comparable Measurements to Traditional Visual Acuity Charts?

Does the EyeChart App for iPhones Give Comparable Measurements to Traditional Visual Acuity Charts?

Aim: To investigate if the EyeChart app gives accurate visual acuity (VA) measurements that are comparable to those achieved using traditional VA charts.

Method: Twenty-four participants (aged 18-27 years, mean 20.13 ± 1.78 years) with VA of 6/60 Snellen or better regardless of any strabismus, amblyopia, or ocular pathology volunteered for this prospective study. The best-corrected monocular VA of each participant's right eye was measured on the Snellen chart at 6 m, the ETDRS chart at 3 m, and the EyeChart app presented on an iPhone SE at 1.2 m (4ft).

Results: The mean VA scores obtained were: -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR on the Snellen chart, -0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR on the ETDRS chart, and -0.09 ± 0.07 logMAR on the EyeChart app. After Bonferroni Correction adjustments were applied, a significant difference was found between the EyeChart app and the Snellen chart (t = -3.756, p = 0.003), however the difference between the EyeChart app and the ETDRS chart did not reach statistical significance (t = -2.391, p = 0.076). The EyeChart app had a strong correlation with both the Snellen (r = 0.79, p < 0.01) and ETDRS charts (r = 0.88, p < 0.01). The Coefficients of Agreement revealed a variation of less than one logMAR line between the EyeChart app and the traditional VA charts (Snellen: 0.09 logMAR; ETDRS: 0.08 logMAR).

Conclusion: This study found that the EyeChart app gives accurate VA scores that are comparable to those achieved using the gold-standard ETDRS chart in a healthy young adult population. However, the accuracy and repeatability of the EyeChart app when testing a patient population must be investigated before it can be integrated into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信