改变Bagolini眼镜能提高反应的可靠性吗?

Q3 Medicine
Anna O'Connor, Laurence Tidbury
{"title":"改变Bagolini眼镜能提高反应的可靠性吗?","authors":"Anna O'Connor,&nbsp;Laurence Tidbury","doi":"10.22599/bioj.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Bagolini striated lenses are a useful test of binocular vision, but the variations in the striations (frequency and thickness) can impact on the perceived image. Also, responses can be difficult to interpret in young children. Therefore, the aims of this project were to evaluate the impact of striation frequency and the addition of coloured filters on subjective responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sets of striated lenses were made (small, medium and large striations), each produced in two forms (both lenses clear, or with a red and blue lens). Also, Bagolini glasses (Optiker Ryser) were used, with and without the addition of red and blue filters. Subjects were asked to report what they perceived, with subsequent questions regarding the number and length of lines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two adult subjects were tested, with uniocular VA ranging from -0.18 to 1.10 logMAR (mean 0.08 ± 0.25). The number of lines seen when varying the line thickness did not vary between coloured and clear lenses (post-hoc analysis following ANOVA, p > 0.1 in all comparisons). Adding red/blue filters to the original Bagolini glasses did not alter the rates of subjects perceiving a cross (Chi-square, p = 0.8). However, the laser-cut lenses produced a significantly shorter light streak than the original lenses (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.001), but the colour of the filters made no difference to the length of streak perceived (Tukey's Test, p = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of coloured filters did not impact on the responses given to the original or laser-cut lenses, suggesting this modification may aid responses in children. However, further evaluation is required with finer striations and thinner lenses to improve the visibility of the lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"142-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could Modifying the Bagolini Glasses Improve the Reliability of Responses?\",\"authors\":\"Anna O'Connor,&nbsp;Laurence Tidbury\",\"doi\":\"10.22599/bioj.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Bagolini striated lenses are a useful test of binocular vision, but the variations in the striations (frequency and thickness) can impact on the perceived image. Also, responses can be difficult to interpret in young children. Therefore, the aims of this project were to evaluate the impact of striation frequency and the addition of coloured filters on subjective responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sets of striated lenses were made (small, medium and large striations), each produced in two forms (both lenses clear, or with a red and blue lens). Also, Bagolini glasses (Optiker Ryser) were used, with and without the addition of red and blue filters. Subjects were asked to report what they perceived, with subsequent questions regarding the number and length of lines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two adult subjects were tested, with uniocular VA ranging from -0.18 to 1.10 logMAR (mean 0.08 ± 0.25). The number of lines seen when varying the line thickness did not vary between coloured and clear lenses (post-hoc analysis following ANOVA, p > 0.1 in all comparisons). Adding red/blue filters to the original Bagolini glasses did not alter the rates of subjects perceiving a cross (Chi-square, p = 0.8). However, the laser-cut lenses produced a significantly shorter light streak than the original lenses (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.001), but the colour of the filters made no difference to the length of streak perceived (Tukey's Test, p = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of coloured filters did not impact on the responses given to the original or laser-cut lenses, suggesting this modification may aid responses in children. However, further evaluation is required with finer striations and thinner lenses to improve the visibility of the lines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"142-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Bagolini条纹透镜是一种有用的双目视觉测试,但条纹(频率和厚度)的变化会影响感知图像。此外,幼儿的反应可能很难解释。因此,该项目的目的是评估条纹频率和彩色滤光片的添加对主观反应的影响。方法:制作三组条纹晶状体(小、中、大条纹),每组晶状体有两种形式(均为透明晶状体或红蓝晶状体)。此外,使用Bagolini眼镜(Optiker Ryser),有或没有添加红色和蓝色滤光片。受试者被要求报告他们所感知到的东西,随后被问及线条的数量和长度。结果:42名成人受试者接受了测试,单眼VA范围为-0.18 ~ 1.10 logMAR(平均0.08±0.25)。当改变线厚时看到的线数在彩色和透明镜片之间没有变化(方差分析后的事后分析,所有比较的p > 0.1)。在原来的巴格里尼眼镜上添加红/蓝滤镜并没有改变受试者感知十字的比率(卡方,p = 0.8)。然而,激光切割镜片产生的光条纹明显短于原始镜片(单因素方差分析,p < 0.001),但滤光片的颜色对感知到的条纹长度没有影响(Tukey检验,p = 0.20)。结论:添加彩色滤光片对原始或激光切割镜片的反应没有影响,这表明这种修改可能有助于儿童的反应。然而,需要进一步评估更细的条纹和更薄的透镜,以提高线条的可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Could Modifying the Bagolini Glasses Improve the Reliability of Responses?

Could Modifying the Bagolini Glasses Improve the Reliability of Responses?

Could Modifying the Bagolini Glasses Improve the Reliability of Responses?

Could Modifying the Bagolini Glasses Improve the Reliability of Responses?

Aims: Bagolini striated lenses are a useful test of binocular vision, but the variations in the striations (frequency and thickness) can impact on the perceived image. Also, responses can be difficult to interpret in young children. Therefore, the aims of this project were to evaluate the impact of striation frequency and the addition of coloured filters on subjective responses.

Methods: Three sets of striated lenses were made (small, medium and large striations), each produced in two forms (both lenses clear, or with a red and blue lens). Also, Bagolini glasses (Optiker Ryser) were used, with and without the addition of red and blue filters. Subjects were asked to report what they perceived, with subsequent questions regarding the number and length of lines.

Results: Forty-two adult subjects were tested, with uniocular VA ranging from -0.18 to 1.10 logMAR (mean 0.08 ± 0.25). The number of lines seen when varying the line thickness did not vary between coloured and clear lenses (post-hoc analysis following ANOVA, p > 0.1 in all comparisons). Adding red/blue filters to the original Bagolini glasses did not alter the rates of subjects perceiving a cross (Chi-square, p = 0.8). However, the laser-cut lenses produced a significantly shorter light streak than the original lenses (One-way ANOVA, p < 0.001), but the colour of the filters made no difference to the length of streak perceived (Tukey's Test, p = 0.20).

Conclusions: The addition of coloured filters did not impact on the responses given to the original or laser-cut lenses, suggesting this modification may aid responses in children. However, further evaluation is required with finer striations and thinner lenses to improve the visibility of the lines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信