呼吸毒理学研究的体外气液界面模型:共识研讨会和建议。

Q2 Health Professions
Ghislaine Lacroix, Wolfgang Koch, Detlef Ritter, Arno C Gutleb, Søren Thor Larsen, Thomas Loret, Filippo Zanetti, Samuel Constant, Savvina Chortarea, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Pieter S Hiemstra, Emeric Frejafon, Philippe Hubert, Laura Gribaldo, Peter Kearns, Jean-Marc Aublant, Silvia Diabaté, Carsten Weiss, Antoinette de Groot, Ingeborg Kooter
{"title":"呼吸毒理学研究的体外气液界面模型:共识研讨会和建议。","authors":"Ghislaine Lacroix,&nbsp;Wolfgang Koch,&nbsp;Detlef Ritter,&nbsp;Arno C Gutleb,&nbsp;Søren Thor Larsen,&nbsp;Thomas Loret,&nbsp;Filippo Zanetti,&nbsp;Samuel Constant,&nbsp;Savvina Chortarea,&nbsp;Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser,&nbsp;Pieter S Hiemstra,&nbsp;Emeric Frejafon,&nbsp;Philippe Hubert,&nbsp;Laura Gribaldo,&nbsp;Peter Kearns,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Aublant,&nbsp;Silvia Diabaté,&nbsp;Carsten Weiss,&nbsp;Antoinette de Groot,&nbsp;Ingeborg Kooter","doi":"10.1089/aivt.2017.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>In vitro</i> air-liquid interface (ALI) cell culture models can potentially be used to assess inhalation toxicology endpoints and are usually considered, in terms of relevancy, between classic (i.e., submerged) <i>in vitro</i> models and animal-based models. In some situations that need to be clearly defined, ALI methods may represent a complement or an alternative option to <i>in vivo</i> experimentations or classic <i>in vitro</i> methods. However, it is clear that many different approaches exist and that only very limited validation studies have been carried out to date. This means comparison of data from different methods is difficult and available methods are currently not suitable for use in regulatory assessments. This is despite inhalation toxicology being a priority area for many governmental organizations. In this setting, a 1-day workshop on ALI <i>in vitro</i> models for respiratory toxicology research was organized in Paris in March 2016 to assess the situation and to discuss what might be possible in terms of validation studies. The workshop was attended by major parties in Europe and brought together more than 60 representatives from various academic, commercial, and regulatory organizations. Following plenary, oral, and poster presentations, an expert panel was convened to lead a discussion on possible approaches to validation studies for ALI inhalation models. A series of recommendations were made and the outcomes of the workshop are reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":37448,"journal":{"name":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","volume":"4 2","pages":"91-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/aivt.2017.0034","citationCount":"119","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air-Liquid Interface <i>In Vitro</i> Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Ghislaine Lacroix,&nbsp;Wolfgang Koch,&nbsp;Detlef Ritter,&nbsp;Arno C Gutleb,&nbsp;Søren Thor Larsen,&nbsp;Thomas Loret,&nbsp;Filippo Zanetti,&nbsp;Samuel Constant,&nbsp;Savvina Chortarea,&nbsp;Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser,&nbsp;Pieter S Hiemstra,&nbsp;Emeric Frejafon,&nbsp;Philippe Hubert,&nbsp;Laura Gribaldo,&nbsp;Peter Kearns,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Aublant,&nbsp;Silvia Diabaté,&nbsp;Carsten Weiss,&nbsp;Antoinette de Groot,&nbsp;Ingeborg Kooter\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/aivt.2017.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>In vitro</i> air-liquid interface (ALI) cell culture models can potentially be used to assess inhalation toxicology endpoints and are usually considered, in terms of relevancy, between classic (i.e., submerged) <i>in vitro</i> models and animal-based models. In some situations that need to be clearly defined, ALI methods may represent a complement or an alternative option to <i>in vivo</i> experimentations or classic <i>in vitro</i> methods. However, it is clear that many different approaches exist and that only very limited validation studies have been carried out to date. This means comparison of data from different methods is difficult and available methods are currently not suitable for use in regulatory assessments. This is despite inhalation toxicology being a priority area for many governmental organizations. In this setting, a 1-day workshop on ALI <i>in vitro</i> models for respiratory toxicology research was organized in Paris in March 2016 to assess the situation and to discuss what might be possible in terms of validation studies. The workshop was attended by major parties in Europe and brought together more than 60 representatives from various academic, commercial, and regulatory organizations. Following plenary, oral, and poster presentations, an expert panel was convened to lead a discussion on possible approaches to validation studies for ALI inhalation models. A series of recommendations were made and the outcomes of the workshop are reported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied In Vitro Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"91-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/aivt.2017.0034\",\"citationCount\":\"119\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied In Vitro Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2017.0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2017.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 119

摘要

体外气液界面(ALI)细胞培养模型可以潜在地用于评估吸入毒理学终点,并且通常考虑经典(即浸没)体外模型和动物模型之间的相关性。在某些需要明确定义的情况下,ALI方法可能是体内实验或经典体外方法的补充或替代选择。然而,很明显存在许多不同的方法,迄今为止只进行了非常有限的验证研究。这意味着比较来自不同方法的数据是困难的,现有的方法目前不适合用于监管评估。尽管吸入毒理学是许多政府组织的优先领域。在此背景下,2016年3月在巴黎组织了为期1天的ALI体外模型呼吸毒理学研究研讨会,以评估情况并讨论在验证研究方面可能存在的问题。欧洲主要政党参加了研讨会,来自各种学术、商业和监管组织的60多名代表参加了会议。在全体会议、口头和海报报告之后,召集了一个专家小组,就ALI吸入模型验证研究的可能方法进行讨论。提出了一系列建议,并报告了讲习班的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Air-Liquid Interface <i>In Vitro</i> Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.

Air-Liquid Interface <i>In Vitro</i> Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.

Air-Liquid Interface <i>In Vitro</i> Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.

Air-Liquid Interface In Vitro Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.

In vitro air-liquid interface (ALI) cell culture models can potentially be used to assess inhalation toxicology endpoints and are usually considered, in terms of relevancy, between classic (i.e., submerged) in vitro models and animal-based models. In some situations that need to be clearly defined, ALI methods may represent a complement or an alternative option to in vivo experimentations or classic in vitro methods. However, it is clear that many different approaches exist and that only very limited validation studies have been carried out to date. This means comparison of data from different methods is difficult and available methods are currently not suitable for use in regulatory assessments. This is despite inhalation toxicology being a priority area for many governmental organizations. In this setting, a 1-day workshop on ALI in vitro models for respiratory toxicology research was organized in Paris in March 2016 to assess the situation and to discuss what might be possible in terms of validation studies. The workshop was attended by major parties in Europe and brought together more than 60 representatives from various academic, commercial, and regulatory organizations. Following plenary, oral, and poster presentations, an expert panel was convened to lead a discussion on possible approaches to validation studies for ALI inhalation models. A series of recommendations were made and the outcomes of the workshop are reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied In Vitro Toxicology
Applied In Vitro Toxicology Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Applied In Vitro Toxicology is a peer-reviewed journal providing the latest research on the application of alternative in vitro testing methods for predicting adverse effects in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and personal care industries. This Journal aims to address important issues facing the various chemical industries, including regulatory requirements; the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing; new screening methods; evaluation of new cell and tissue models; and the most appropriate methods for assessing safety and satisfying regulatory demands. The Journal also delivers the latest views and opinions of developers of new models, end users of the models, academic laboratories that are inventing new tools, and regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, Latin America, Australia and Asia. Applied In Vitro Toxicology is the journal that scientists involved with hazard identification and risk assessment will read to understand how new and existing in vitro methods are applied, and the questions for which these models provide answers. Applied In Vitro Toxicology coverage includes: -Applied in vitro toxicology industry standards -New technologies developed for applied in vitro toxicology -Data acquisition, cleaning, distribution, and best practices -Data protection, privacy, and policy -Business interests from research to product -The changing role of in vitro toxicology -Visualization and design principles of applied in vitro toxicology infrastructures -Physical interfaces and robotics -Opportunities around applied in vitro toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信