丙型肝炎病毒感染患者同时使用直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)和中枢神经系统药物。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Antoni Sicras-Mainar, Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
{"title":"丙型肝炎病毒感染患者同时使用直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)和中枢神经系统药物。","authors":"Antoni Sicras-Mainar,&nbsp;Ramón Morillo-Verdugo","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.1551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to determine potential drug interactions (DI) between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (pDAA) and concomitant central nervous system (CNS) medication in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Transversal design. Patients aged ≥ 18 years on treatment with pDAA during 2017 were included. The variables collected were comorbidity, concomitant CNS medication and potential DI. The pDAA analyzed were a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Descriptive statistical analysis. We recruited 1,170 patients (mean age 60.1 years, 56.4% male). Mean concomitant drug use was 3.2 per patient/year. The percentages of potential / possible DI between the DAAs and the concomitant drugs on the CNS were: 2.7% contraindications, 11.3% significant and 4.2% weak. By pDAA, the percentages were: SOF/VEL (2.7%; 0.0%; 4.4%), GLE/GDP (2.7%; 26.5%; 1.6%) SOF/VEL/VOX (2.7%; 6.8%; 4.4%), respectively. Concomitant CNS medication was used in one third of HCV patients. It is important to select a pDAA with a low rate of potential DI to simplify treatment. SOF/VEL is a good alternative compared with the other pDAA studied, mainly due to the concomitant use of antipsychotics and analgesics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":" ","pages":"279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concomitant use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and central nervous system drugs in patients with hepatitis C virus infection.\",\"authors\":\"Antoni Sicras-Mainar,&nbsp;Ramón Morillo-Verdugo\",\"doi\":\"10.20882/adicciones.1551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our objective was to determine potential drug interactions (DI) between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (pDAA) and concomitant central nervous system (CNS) medication in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Transversal design. Patients aged ≥ 18 years on treatment with pDAA during 2017 were included. The variables collected were comorbidity, concomitant CNS medication and potential DI. The pDAA analyzed were a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Descriptive statistical analysis. We recruited 1,170 patients (mean age 60.1 years, 56.4% male). Mean concomitant drug use was 3.2 per patient/year. The percentages of potential / possible DI between the DAAs and the concomitant drugs on the CNS were: 2.7% contraindications, 11.3% significant and 4.2% weak. By pDAA, the percentages were: SOF/VEL (2.7%; 0.0%; 4.4%), GLE/GDP (2.7%; 26.5%; 1.6%) SOF/VEL/VOX (2.7%; 6.8%; 4.4%), respectively. Concomitant CNS medication was used in one third of HCV patients. It is important to select a pDAA with a low rate of potential DI to simplify treatment. SOF/VEL is a good alternative compared with the other pDAA studied, mainly due to the concomitant use of antipsychotics and analgesics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adicciones\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"279-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adicciones\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们的目的是确定慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者泛型直接作用抗病毒药物(pDAA)与伴随的中枢神经系统(CNS)药物之间潜在的药物相互作用(DI)。横向的设计。纳入2017年接受pDAA治疗的年龄≥18岁的患者。收集的变量包括合并症、伴随的中枢神经系统药物和潜在的DI。pDAA分析为a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB)和c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX)。描述性统计分析。我们招募了1170例患者(平均年龄60.1岁,56.4%为男性)。平均合并用药为3.2例/患者/年。daa与伴随药物对中枢神经系统潜在/可能DI的百分比为:禁忌症2.7%,显著11.3%,弱4.2%。按pDAA计算,百分比为:SOF/VEL (2.7%;0.0%;4.4%), gle / gdp (2.7%;26.5%;soft / vel / vox (2.7%;6.8%;4.4%),分别为。三分之一的HCV患者同时使用中枢神经系统药物。选择潜在DI率低的pDAA以简化治疗是很重要的。与所研究的其他pDAA相比,SOF/VEL是一种较好的替代方案,主要是由于其与抗精神病药物和镇痛药物合用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concomitant use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and central nervous system drugs in patients with hepatitis C virus infection.

Our objective was to determine potential drug interactions (DI) between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (pDAA) and concomitant central nervous system (CNS) medication in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Transversal design. Patients aged ≥ 18 years on treatment with pDAA during 2017 were included. The variables collected were comorbidity, concomitant CNS medication and potential DI. The pDAA analyzed were a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Descriptive statistical analysis. We recruited 1,170 patients (mean age 60.1 years, 56.4% male). Mean concomitant drug use was 3.2 per patient/year. The percentages of potential / possible DI between the DAAs and the concomitant drugs on the CNS were: 2.7% contraindications, 11.3% significant and 4.2% weak. By pDAA, the percentages were: SOF/VEL (2.7%; 0.0%; 4.4%), GLE/GDP (2.7%; 26.5%; 1.6%) SOF/VEL/VOX (2.7%; 6.8%; 4.4%), respectively. Concomitant CNS medication was used in one third of HCV patients. It is important to select a pDAA with a low rate of potential DI to simplify treatment. SOF/VEL is a good alternative compared with the other pDAA studied, mainly due to the concomitant use of antipsychotics and analgesics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adicciones
Adicciones SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信