《书写史》反映了教育对话语结构的影响:对读写、口头、精神和轴心时代的影响

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Sylvia Pinheiro , Natália Bezerra Mota , Mariano Sigman , Diego Fernández-Slezak , Antonio Guerreiro , Luís Fernando Tófoli , Guillermo Cecchi , Mauro Copelli , Sidarta Ribeiro
{"title":"《书写史》反映了教育对话语结构的影响:对读写、口头、精神和轴心时代的影响","authors":"Sylvia Pinheiro ,&nbsp;Natália Bezerra Mota ,&nbsp;Mariano Sigman ,&nbsp;Diego Fernández-Slezak ,&nbsp;Antonio Guerreiro ,&nbsp;Luís Fernando Tófoli ,&nbsp;Guillermo Cecchi ,&nbsp;Mauro Copelli ,&nbsp;Sidarta Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Pinheiro ,&nbsp;Natália Bezerra Mota ,&nbsp;Mariano Sigman ,&nbsp;Diego Fernández-Slezak ,&nbsp;Antonio Guerreiro ,&nbsp;Luís Fernando Tófoli ,&nbsp;Guillermo Cecchi ,&nbsp;Mauro Copelli ,&nbsp;Sidarta Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949320300181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949320300181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景图分析检测精神病和读写能力的获得。青铜时代的文学被认为包含幼稚或精神病的特征,这些特征只会在轴心时代(约公元前800-200年)成熟,这是当代心理的假定界限。方法对跨度约4500年的文学文本进行的图表分析显示,随着时间的推移,这种变化具有显著的渐近性。结果词法多样性、远程递归性和图长逐渐向随机水平增加,而短期递归性逐渐向随机水平下降。青铜器时代的文本在结构上类似于识字的典型儿童和识字的精神病成年人的口头报告,但不同于诗歌,也不同于识字前的学龄前儿童或美洲印第安人的叙述。文本结构重构了“时间之箭”,趋同于轴心年龄开始时受过教育的成人水平。结论口述传统和读写传统的教育路径在结构上存在差异,口述传统的教育路径复发范围减小,而读写传统的教育路径复发范围增大。教育似乎是话语成熟的驱动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age

Background

Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality.

Method

Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time.

Results

While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset.

Conclusion

The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信