句子重复作为识别三年级塞佩迪-英语双语者语言障碍的工具时受到的语境影响:双语规范的反面案例。

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Heila Jordaan, Monene H Ngwanduli
{"title":"句子重复作为识别三年级塞佩迪-英语双语者语言障碍的工具时受到的语境影响:双语规范的反面案例。","authors":"Heila Jordaan, Monene H Ngwanduli","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specific language impairment (SLI) is difficult to identify because it is a subtle linguistic difficulty, and there are a few measures available to differentiate between typical and atypical language development in bilinguals. Sentence repetition (SR) has strong theoretical foundations and research evidence as a valid tool for the identification of SLI in bilinguals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the value of SR using peer group comparisons to identify Sepedi-English bilingual children at the risk of SLI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred and two Grade 3 learners in three different contexts of education were assessed on equivalent English and Sepedi SR measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven participants who scored between 1 and 2 standard deviations (SD) below the peer group means on both the English and Sepedi SR tests were identified with possible SLI. Learners in the English language of learning and teaching (LoLT) - Sepedi additional language (SAL) context obtained similar scores in both languages, a higher score in English than the English LoLT group and a higher score in Sepedi than the Sepedi LoLT - EAL group. The English LoLT group obtained a significantly higher score in English than in Sepedi and a significantly lower score than the other two groups in Sepedi. The Sepedi LoLT group obtained a significantly higher score in Sepedi than in English, their additional language, in which they obtained a significantly lower score than the other two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sentence repetition tasks are valid screening tools to identify bilingual children with SLI by comparing them to peer groups. The SR tests were sensitive to language practices in different educational contexts. It was observed that a bilingual approach that uses both English and the home language as academic languages leads to better language outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"67 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual influences on sentence repetition as a tool for the identification of language impairment in Grade 3 Sepedi-English bilinguals: A case against bilingual norms.\",\"authors\":\"Heila Jordaan, Monene H Ngwanduli\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specific language impairment (SLI) is difficult to identify because it is a subtle linguistic difficulty, and there are a few measures available to differentiate between typical and atypical language development in bilinguals. Sentence repetition (SR) has strong theoretical foundations and research evidence as a valid tool for the identification of SLI in bilinguals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the value of SR using peer group comparisons to identify Sepedi-English bilingual children at the risk of SLI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred and two Grade 3 learners in three different contexts of education were assessed on equivalent English and Sepedi SR measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven participants who scored between 1 and 2 standard deviations (SD) below the peer group means on both the English and Sepedi SR tests were identified with possible SLI. Learners in the English language of learning and teaching (LoLT) - Sepedi additional language (SAL) context obtained similar scores in both languages, a higher score in English than the English LoLT group and a higher score in Sepedi than the Sepedi LoLT - EAL group. The English LoLT group obtained a significantly higher score in English than in Sepedi and a significantly lower score than the other two groups in Sepedi. The Sepedi LoLT group obtained a significantly higher score in Sepedi than in English, their additional language, in which they obtained a significantly lower score than the other two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sentence repetition tasks are valid screening tools to identify bilingual children with SLI by comparing them to peer groups. The SR tests were sensitive to language practices in different educational contexts. It was observed that a bilingual approach that uses both English and the home language as academic languages leads to better language outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7479431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特殊语言障碍(SLI)很难识别,因为它是一种微妙的语言障碍,而且目前只有少数测量方法可用于区分双语者的典型和非典型语言发展。句子重复(SR)具有坚实的理论基础和研究证据,是识别二语儿童 SLI 的有效工具:本研究通过同龄人组比较来评估句子重复的价值,以识别有 SLI 风险的塞佩迪-英语双语儿童:在三种不同的教育背景下,对 120 名三年级学生进行了等效英语和塞佩迪语 SR 测评:结果:11 名参加者在英语和 Sepedi SR 测试中的得分比同龄组平均分低 1 到 2 个标准差 (SD),他们被确认可能患有 SLI。英语学习和教学语言(LoLT)--Sepedi 附加语言(SAL)情境中的学习者在两种语言中获得的分数相似,英语分数高于英语学习和教学语言组,Sepedi 分数高于 Sepedi 学习和教学语言--EAL 组。英语 LoLT 组的英语成绩明显高于 Sepedi 组,而 Sepedi 组的成绩明显低于其他两组。Sepedi LoLT 组在 Sepedi 中的得分明显高于英语(他们的附加语言),而在英语中的得分则明显低于其他两组:句子复述任务是一种有效的筛查工具,可通过与同龄儿童进行比较来识别患有 SLI 的双语儿童。句子重复测试对不同教育背景下的语言实践非常敏感。据观察,同时使用英语和母语作为学习语言的双语教学法可取得更好的语言成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contextual influences on sentence repetition as a tool for the identification of language impairment in Grade 3 Sepedi-English bilinguals: A case against bilingual norms.

Background: Specific language impairment (SLI) is difficult to identify because it is a subtle linguistic difficulty, and there are a few measures available to differentiate between typical and atypical language development in bilinguals. Sentence repetition (SR) has strong theoretical foundations and research evidence as a valid tool for the identification of SLI in bilinguals.

Objective: This study assessed the value of SR using peer group comparisons to identify Sepedi-English bilingual children at the risk of SLI.

Method: One hundred and two Grade 3 learners in three different contexts of education were assessed on equivalent English and Sepedi SR measures.

Results: Eleven participants who scored between 1 and 2 standard deviations (SD) below the peer group means on both the English and Sepedi SR tests were identified with possible SLI. Learners in the English language of learning and teaching (LoLT) - Sepedi additional language (SAL) context obtained similar scores in both languages, a higher score in English than the English LoLT group and a higher score in Sepedi than the Sepedi LoLT - EAL group. The English LoLT group obtained a significantly higher score in English than in Sepedi and a significantly lower score than the other two groups in Sepedi. The Sepedi LoLT group obtained a significantly higher score in Sepedi than in English, their additional language, in which they obtained a significantly lower score than the other two groups.

Conclusion: Sentence repetition tasks are valid screening tools to identify bilingual children with SLI by comparing them to peer groups. The SR tests were sensitive to language practices in different educational contexts. It was observed that a bilingual approach that uses both English and the home language as academic languages leads to better language outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信