正常男性受试者手臂支撑时的呼吸工作。

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2020-11-26 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.29390/cjrt-2020-012
Tomoyuki Ogino, Kyoshi Mase, Shigefumi Murakami, Kazuhisa Domen
{"title":"正常男性受试者手臂支撑时的呼吸工作。","authors":"Tomoyuki Ogino,&nbsp;Kyoshi Mase,&nbsp;Shigefumi Murakami,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Domen","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2020-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients get relief from their dyspnea by arm bracing, the mechanics of this effect are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which arm bracing affects dyspnea by measuring the work of breathing (WOB) in the arm bracing posture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six normal male subjects were studied in two standing postures: erect and with their arms braced. For the arm bracing posture, the subjects leaned forward with their arms stretched and rested their hands on a platform. Respiratory frequency was set at 20 tidal breaths/min with the use of a metronome, and tidal volume was set at 1 L by observing the lung volume on a monitor. All the subjects randomly adopted the two postures, and a preset respiratory pattern was measured for 30 s in each posture. Lung volume and flow rate were measured using a hot-wire flowmeter. Esophageal pressure was measured using a 12-cm balloon catheter. The WOB was estimated using modified Campbell diagrams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lung volume increased and inspiratory resistive WOB decreased, while inspiratory elastic WOB increased significantly with arm bracing compared with that of the erect posture (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arm bracing posture increases the chest wall expansion thereby increasing the end-expiratory lung volume and decreasing the inspiratory resistive WOB among healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"56 ","pages":"65-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/f6/cjrt-2020-012.PMC7690311.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work of breathing during arm bracing in normal male subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoyuki Ogino,&nbsp;Kyoshi Mase,&nbsp;Shigefumi Murakami,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Domen\",\"doi\":\"10.29390/cjrt-2020-012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients get relief from their dyspnea by arm bracing, the mechanics of this effect are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which arm bracing affects dyspnea by measuring the work of breathing (WOB) in the arm bracing posture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six normal male subjects were studied in two standing postures: erect and with their arms braced. For the arm bracing posture, the subjects leaned forward with their arms stretched and rested their hands on a platform. Respiratory frequency was set at 20 tidal breaths/min with the use of a metronome, and tidal volume was set at 1 L by observing the lung volume on a monitor. All the subjects randomly adopted the two postures, and a preset respiratory pattern was measured for 30 s in each posture. Lung volume and flow rate were measured using a hot-wire flowmeter. Esophageal pressure was measured using a 12-cm balloon catheter. The WOB was estimated using modified Campbell diagrams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lung volume increased and inspiratory resistive WOB decreased, while inspiratory elastic WOB increased significantly with arm bracing compared with that of the erect posture (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arm bracing posture increases the chest wall expansion thereby increasing the end-expiratory lung volume and decreasing the inspiratory resistive WOB among healthy individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"65-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/f6/cjrt-2020-012.PMC7690311.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2020-012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2020-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者可以通过手臂支具缓解呼吸困难,但这种效果的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过测量手臂支撑姿势的呼吸功(WOB)来探讨手臂支撑对呼吸困难的影响机制。方法:对6名正常男性受试者进行直立和双臂支撑两种站立姿势的研究。在手臂支撑姿势中,受试者身体前倾,手臂伸展,双手放在平台上。使用节拍器将呼吸频率设定为20次潮汐呼吸/min,通过监护仪观察肺容量将潮气量设定为1 L。所有受试者随机采用这两种姿势,并在每种姿势下测量预设的呼吸模式30秒。采用热线流量计测量肺容量和肺流速。采用12cm球囊导管测量食管压力。使用修改后的Campbell图估计WOB。结果:与直立体位相比,支臂组肺容量增加,吸气阻力性肺工作负荷降低,吸气弹性肺工作负荷显著增加(P < 0.05)。结论:手臂支撑体位增加了健康人的胸壁扩张,从而增加了呼气末肺容量,降低了吸气阻力WOB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Work of breathing during arm bracing in normal male subjects.

Work of breathing during arm bracing in normal male subjects.

Work of breathing during arm bracing in normal male subjects.

Work of breathing during arm bracing in normal male subjects.

Objective: Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients get relief from their dyspnea by arm bracing, the mechanics of this effect are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which arm bracing affects dyspnea by measuring the work of breathing (WOB) in the arm bracing posture.

Methods: Six normal male subjects were studied in two standing postures: erect and with their arms braced. For the arm bracing posture, the subjects leaned forward with their arms stretched and rested their hands on a platform. Respiratory frequency was set at 20 tidal breaths/min with the use of a metronome, and tidal volume was set at 1 L by observing the lung volume on a monitor. All the subjects randomly adopted the two postures, and a preset respiratory pattern was measured for 30 s in each posture. Lung volume and flow rate were measured using a hot-wire flowmeter. Esophageal pressure was measured using a 12-cm balloon catheter. The WOB was estimated using modified Campbell diagrams.

Results: Lung volume increased and inspiratory resistive WOB decreased, while inspiratory elastic WOB increased significantly with arm bracing compared with that of the erect posture (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Arm bracing posture increases the chest wall expansion thereby increasing the end-expiratory lung volume and decreasing the inspiratory resistive WOB among healthy individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信