活体肝移植术后门静脉血栓血管内治疗的可行性及中长期效果。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Koji Tokunaga, Akihiro Furuta, Hiroyoshi Isoda, Shinji Uemoto, Kaori Togashi
{"title":"活体肝移植术后门静脉血栓血管内治疗的可行性及中长期效果。","authors":"Koji Tokunaga,&nbsp;Akihiro Furuta,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Isoda,&nbsp;Shinji Uemoto,&nbsp;Kaori Togashi","doi":"10.5152/dir.2020.19469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty cases (14 males, 16 females; age range, 0.67-65 years) who underwent endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and/or collateral embolization for PVT after LDLT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and procedural data were collected and analyzed regarding the patency of the PVT site at the last follow-up date (PVT-free persistency) using Log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 120 months. The technical success rate was 80% (n=24). Patency rates at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months were 73%, 59%, 55%, 51%, 51%, 51%, and 51% for primary patency and 80%, 70%, 66%, 66%, 66%, 61%, and 61% for assisted patency after secondary endovascular treatment. PVT-free persistency rates regarding the subgroups were as follows: children under 12 years vs. adults, 50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42); acute vs. nonacute, 76% vs. 46% (P = 0.10); localized vs. extensive, 90% vs. 50% (P = 0.035); transileocolic approach vs. percutaneous-transhepatic approach, 71% vs. 54% (P = 0.39); and thrombolysis-based treatment vs. non-thrombolysis-based treatment, 71% vs. 44% (P = 0.12), respectively. Among technically successful cases, PVT-free persistency rate was 94% for those with hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein vs. 17% for those without hepatopetal flow (P < 0.001). The only major complication occurring was pleural hemorrhage (n=1). Minor complications (i.e., fever) occurred in 18 patients (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, mid- to long-term portal patency following endovascular treatment was approximately 50%-60% in PVT patients after LDLT. PVT site patency over three months after the first endovascular treatment, localized PVT, and hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein were identified as key prognostic factors for mid- to long-term portal patency.</p>","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837713/pdf/dir-27-1-65.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Tokunaga,&nbsp;Akihiro Furuta,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Isoda,&nbsp;Shinji Uemoto,&nbsp;Kaori Togashi\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/dir.2020.19469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty cases (14 males, 16 females; age range, 0.67-65 years) who underwent endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and/or collateral embolization for PVT after LDLT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and procedural data were collected and analyzed regarding the patency of the PVT site at the last follow-up date (PVT-free persistency) using Log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 120 months. The technical success rate was 80% (n=24). Patency rates at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months were 73%, 59%, 55%, 51%, 51%, 51%, and 51% for primary patency and 80%, 70%, 66%, 66%, 66%, 61%, and 61% for assisted patency after secondary endovascular treatment. PVT-free persistency rates regarding the subgroups were as follows: children under 12 years vs. adults, 50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42); acute vs. nonacute, 76% vs. 46% (P = 0.10); localized vs. extensive, 90% vs. 50% (P = 0.035); transileocolic approach vs. percutaneous-transhepatic approach, 71% vs. 54% (P = 0.39); and thrombolysis-based treatment vs. non-thrombolysis-based treatment, 71% vs. 44% (P = 0.12), respectively. Among technically successful cases, PVT-free persistency rate was 94% for those with hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein vs. 17% for those without hepatopetal flow (P < 0.001). The only major complication occurring was pleural hemorrhage (n=1). Minor complications (i.e., fever) occurred in 18 patients (60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, mid- to long-term portal patency following endovascular treatment was approximately 50%-60% in PVT patients after LDLT. PVT site patency over three months after the first endovascular treatment, localized PVT, and hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein were identified as key prognostic factors for mid- to long-term portal patency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837713/pdf/dir-27-1-65.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2020.19469\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2020.19469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价活体肝移植(LDLT)术后门静脉血栓形成(PVT)血管内治疗的中长期效果。方法:30例患者(男14例,女16例;回顾性分析了2001年至2017年接受血管内治疗的LDLT术后PVT患者,包括溶栓、血管成形术、支架置入术和/或侧支栓塞。采用Log-rank检验收集和分析最后一次随访时PVT部位的通畅性(无PVT持续性)的临床和手术数据。P < 0.05认为结果有统计学意义。结果:中位随访时间为120个月。技术成功率为80% (n=24)。第1周、第1、3、6、12、36和60个月时,原发性通畅率分别为73%、59%、55%、51%、51%、51%和51%;二次血管内治疗后辅助通畅率分别为80%、70%、66%、66%、66%、61%和61%。各组无pvt持续率如下:12岁以下儿童vs.成人,50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42);急性vs非急性,76% vs 46% (P = 0.10);局部vs广泛,90% vs 50% (P = 0.035);经回肠结肠入路vs经皮经肝入路,71% vs 54% (P = 0.39);基于溶栓治疗与非溶栓治疗,分别为71%对44% (P = 0.12)。在技术上成功的病例中,门静脉周围有肝顶血流的患者无pvt持续率为94%,而没有肝顶血流的患者为17% (P < 0.001)。唯一的主要并发症是胸膜出血(n=1)。18例(60%)患者出现轻微并发症(如发热)。结论:LDLT后PVT患者经血管内治疗后的中长期门静脉通畅率约为50%-60%。首次血管内治疗后3个月PVT部位通畅,局限性PVT和门静脉周围肝壁血流被认为是中长期门静脉通畅的关键预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods: Thirty cases (14 males, 16 females; age range, 0.67-65 years) who underwent endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and/or collateral embolization for PVT after LDLT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and procedural data were collected and analyzed regarding the patency of the PVT site at the last follow-up date (PVT-free persistency) using Log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results: Median follow-up was 120 months. The technical success rate was 80% (n=24). Patency rates at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months were 73%, 59%, 55%, 51%, 51%, 51%, and 51% for primary patency and 80%, 70%, 66%, 66%, 66%, 61%, and 61% for assisted patency after secondary endovascular treatment. PVT-free persistency rates regarding the subgroups were as follows: children under 12 years vs. adults, 50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42); acute vs. nonacute, 76% vs. 46% (P = 0.10); localized vs. extensive, 90% vs. 50% (P = 0.035); transileocolic approach vs. percutaneous-transhepatic approach, 71% vs. 54% (P = 0.39); and thrombolysis-based treatment vs. non-thrombolysis-based treatment, 71% vs. 44% (P = 0.12), respectively. Among technically successful cases, PVT-free persistency rate was 94% for those with hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein vs. 17% for those without hepatopetal flow (P < 0.001). The only major complication occurring was pleural hemorrhage (n=1). Minor complications (i.e., fever) occurred in 18 patients (60%).

Conclusion: In conclusion, mid- to long-term portal patency following endovascular treatment was approximately 50%-60% in PVT patients after LDLT. PVT site patency over three months after the first endovascular treatment, localized PVT, and hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein were identified as key prognostic factors for mid- to long-term portal patency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信