IVF中卵巢不良反应管理的最新进展:从博洛尼亚标准到波塞冬概念的转变。

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2020-07-31 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2633494120941480
Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Erlisa Bardhi, Liese Boudry, Alberto Vaiarelli, Antonis Makrigiannakis, Sandro C Esteves, Herman Tournaye, Christophe Blockeel
{"title":"IVF中卵巢不良反应管理的最新进展:从博洛尼亚标准到波塞冬概念的转变。","authors":"Panagiotis Drakopoulos,&nbsp;Erlisa Bardhi,&nbsp;Liese Boudry,&nbsp;Alberto Vaiarelli,&nbsp;Antonis Makrigiannakis,&nbsp;Sandro C Esteves,&nbsp;Herman Tournaye,&nbsp;Christophe Blockeel","doi":"10.1177/2633494120941480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the considerate progress to which assisted reproduction technology (ART) has been subject since 1978, some issues remain unresolved. Notably, the clinical management of patients with a poor ovarian response is still a challenge in everyday practice, frustrating to both the patient and the fertility expert. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) embody 9-24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, meaning that up to one in four patients conceals a poor reproductive prognosis. The last decade has witnessed the attempts of the medical community to standardize diagnosis of POR with the developing of the Bologna Criteria and the subsequent evolution of the low prognosis patient elaborated in the POSEIDON classification. The aim of this article is to summarize all evidence concerning etiology and management of poor ovarian response, including the most recent advances and future prospects in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2633494120941480","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept.\",\"authors\":\"Panagiotis Drakopoulos,&nbsp;Erlisa Bardhi,&nbsp;Liese Boudry,&nbsp;Alberto Vaiarelli,&nbsp;Antonis Makrigiannakis,&nbsp;Sandro C Esteves,&nbsp;Herman Tournaye,&nbsp;Christophe Blockeel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2633494120941480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the considerate progress to which assisted reproduction technology (ART) has been subject since 1978, some issues remain unresolved. Notably, the clinical management of patients with a poor ovarian response is still a challenge in everyday practice, frustrating to both the patient and the fertility expert. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) embody 9-24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, meaning that up to one in four patients conceals a poor reproductive prognosis. The last decade has witnessed the attempts of the medical community to standardize diagnosis of POR with the developing of the Bologna Criteria and the subsequent evolution of the low prognosis patient elaborated in the POSEIDON classification. The aim of this article is to summarize all evidence concerning etiology and management of poor ovarian response, including the most recent advances and future prospects in this regard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2633494120941480\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120941480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120941480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

尽管自1978年以来,辅助生殖技术(ART)取得了长足的进步,但仍有一些问题尚未解决。值得注意的是,卵巢反应不良患者的临床管理在日常实践中仍然是一个挑战,令患者和生育专家都感到沮丧。卵巢反应不良(PORs)占接受卵巢刺激的患者的9-24%,这意味着多达四分之一的患者隐藏着不良的生殖预后。在过去的十年中,随着博洛尼亚标准的发展,以及随后在波塞冬分类中阐述的低预后患者的演变,医学界试图标准化POR的诊断。本文的目的是总结有关卵巢不良反应的病因和治疗的所有证据,包括这方面的最新进展和未来前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept.

Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept.

Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept.

Despite the considerate progress to which assisted reproduction technology (ART) has been subject since 1978, some issues remain unresolved. Notably, the clinical management of patients with a poor ovarian response is still a challenge in everyday practice, frustrating to both the patient and the fertility expert. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) embody 9-24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, meaning that up to one in four patients conceals a poor reproductive prognosis. The last decade has witnessed the attempts of the medical community to standardize diagnosis of POR with the developing of the Bologna Criteria and the subsequent evolution of the low prognosis patient elaborated in the POSEIDON classification. The aim of this article is to summarize all evidence concerning etiology and management of poor ovarian response, including the most recent advances and future prospects in this regard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信