帕尼珠单抗在癌症患者中的剂量方案依据:是否基于体重。

IF 3.1 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2020-07-31 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S262949
Michael Z Liao, Marloes Berkhout, Hans Prenen, Sandeep Dutta, Vijay V Upreti
{"title":"帕尼珠单抗在癌症患者中的剂量方案依据:是否基于体重。","authors":"Michael Z Liao,&nbsp;Marloes Berkhout,&nbsp;Hans Prenen,&nbsp;Sandeep Dutta,&nbsp;Vijay V Upreti","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S262949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type <i>RAS</i> metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [C<sub>max]</sub> and trough [C<sub>min</sub>] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> increased with increasing body weight; the mean C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":"12 ","pages":"109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S262949","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Regimen Rationale for Panitumumab in Cancer Patients: To Be Based on Body Weight or Not.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Z Liao,&nbsp;Marloes Berkhout,&nbsp;Hans Prenen,&nbsp;Sandeep Dutta,&nbsp;Vijay V Upreti\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPAA.S262949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type <i>RAS</i> metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [C<sub>max]</sub> and trough [C<sub>min</sub>] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> increased with increasing body weight; the mean C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"109-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S262949\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S262949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S262949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

体重会影响抗体治疗的暴露、安全性和有效性;有时这些影响可能与临床无关。Panitumumab被批准用于野生型RAS转移性结直肠癌,使用基于体重的给药方案。最近,一份报告引用了帕尼珠单抗的固定剂量使用,而不是批准的基于体重的剂量。目前的工作是根据临床数据、建模和模拟科学地评估最佳给药方案。在此,我们评估了固定剂量和体重剂量对帕尼单抗药代动力学的影响,以确定哪种方法导致患者间药代动力学变异性最小。患者和方法:从Vectibix项目,352名患者入组了3项研究;他们接受了帕尼珠单抗(基于体重的剂量:每2周6 mg/kg),并有药代动力学(最大血清[Cmax]和谷[Cmin]浓度)和体重数据。此外,使用从1200名患者中开发的群体药代动力学模型模拟固定剂量(480 mg)和基于体重剂量(6 mg/kg)的浓度-时间曲线。结果:帕尼单抗给药6 mg/kg后,Cmax和Cmin随体重增加而升高;体重88 kg患者的平均Cmax和Cmin(上四分位数)。浓度-时间曲线下的模拟面积(AUC)数据也表明,在以体重为基础的方案中,帕尼单抗的总体暴露量随着体重的增加而增加。当模拟固定剂量(480 mg)的AUC时,观察到相反的效果。在体重范围内,以体重为基础的剂量(29%)比固定剂量(34%)的模拟AUC的患者间变异性更低。结论:结果表明,与固定剂量方法相比,基于体重的剂量(6mg /kg)减少了帕尼珠单抗暴露在整个体重范围内的变异性,表明基于体重的方法是推荐的患者给药策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dose Regimen Rationale for Panitumumab in Cancer Patients: To Be Based on Body Weight or Not.

Dose Regimen Rationale for Panitumumab in Cancer Patients: To Be Based on Body Weight or Not.

Dose Regimen Rationale for Panitumumab in Cancer Patients: To Be Based on Body Weight or Not.

Introduction: Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.

Patients and methods: From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [Cmax] and trough [Cmin] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients.

Results: After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, Cmax and Cmin increased with increasing body weight; the mean Cmax and Cmin for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%).

Conclusion: Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信