Gineke Hanzen, Aly Waninge, Ruth M A van Nispen, Carla Vlaskamp, Wendy J Post, Annette A J van der Putten
{"title":"干预对专业人员视障及重度或重度智障成人参与态度的影响。","authors":"Gineke Hanzen, Aly Waninge, Ruth M A van Nispen, Carla Vlaskamp, Wendy J Post, Annette A J van der Putten","doi":"10.1111/jar.12792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the effects of the \"Care for Participation+\" (CFP+) intervention on direct support professionals' (DSPs') attitudes regarding the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities (VSPID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a pilot non-randomized controlled trial with two control groups to compare DSPs' attitudes towards CFP+ using the Attitudes towards Participation Questionnaire (APQ) and DSPs' written profiles of adults with VSPID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPP+ and the Participation Mind Map control group showed a positive trend for the \"leisure/recreation,\" \"social relations,\" and \"ability to act\" APQ domains compared to the usual care control group. The CFP+ group described significantly fewer disabilities at 6 months, reflecting a more positive attitude than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CFP+ had positive effects on DSPs' attitudes towards the participation of adults with VSPID. The small sample size, ceiling effects, measurement instruments used, and implementation difficulties may have hampered understanding the full potential of CFP+.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"34 1","pages":"129-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12792","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention effects on professionals' attitudes towards the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Gineke Hanzen, Aly Waninge, Ruth M A van Nispen, Carla Vlaskamp, Wendy J Post, Annette A J van der Putten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.12792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the effects of the \\\"Care for Participation+\\\" (CFP+) intervention on direct support professionals' (DSPs') attitudes regarding the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities (VSPID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a pilot non-randomized controlled trial with two control groups to compare DSPs' attitudes towards CFP+ using the Attitudes towards Participation Questionnaire (APQ) and DSPs' written profiles of adults with VSPID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPP+ and the Participation Mind Map control group showed a positive trend for the \\\"leisure/recreation,\\\" \\\"social relations,\\\" and \\\"ability to act\\\" APQ domains compared to the usual care control group. The CFP+ group described significantly fewer disabilities at 6 months, reflecting a more positive attitude than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CFP+ had positive effects on DSPs' attitudes towards the participation of adults with VSPID. The small sample size, ceiling effects, measurement instruments used, and implementation difficulties may have hampered understanding the full potential of CFP+.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"129-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12792\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:研究了“关怀参与+”(Care for Participation+， CFP+)干预对直接支持专业人员(direct support professionals, dsp)对视力和重度或深度智力残疾(VSPID)成人参与护理态度的影响。方法:采用参与态度问卷(attitude towards Participation Questionnaire, APQ)和成人VSPID患者的书面资料，对两组患者进行非随机对照试验，比较他们对CFP+的态度。结果:CPP+组和参与性思维导图对照组在“休闲/娱乐”、“社会关系”和“行动能力”APQ领域与常规护理对照组相比有积极的趋势。CFP+组在6个月时描述的残疾明显减少，反映出比对照组更积极的态度。结论:CFP+对成人VSPID患者的参与态度有正向影响。小样本量、上限效应、使用的测量仪器和实施困难可能阻碍了对CFP+的全部潜力的理解。
Intervention effects on professionals' attitudes towards the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities.
Background: We investigated the effects of the "Care for Participation+" (CFP+) intervention on direct support professionals' (DSPs') attitudes regarding the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities (VSPID).
Methods: We implemented a pilot non-randomized controlled trial with two control groups to compare DSPs' attitudes towards CFP+ using the Attitudes towards Participation Questionnaire (APQ) and DSPs' written profiles of adults with VSPID.
Results: CPP+ and the Participation Mind Map control group showed a positive trend for the "leisure/recreation," "social relations," and "ability to act" APQ domains compared to the usual care control group. The CFP+ group described significantly fewer disabilities at 6 months, reflecting a more positive attitude than controls.
Conclusion: CFP+ had positive effects on DSPs' attitudes towards the participation of adults with VSPID. The small sample size, ceiling effects, measurement instruments used, and implementation difficulties may have hampered understanding the full potential of CFP+.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
