研究tDCS对视觉定向辨别任务表现的影响:“安慰剂的可能影响”。

A BinDawood, A Dickinson, A Aytemur, C Howarth, E Milne, M Jones
{"title":"研究tDCS对视觉定向辨别任务表现的影响:“安慰剂的可能影响”。","authors":"A BinDawood,&nbsp;A Dickinson,&nbsp;A Aytemur,&nbsp;C Howarth,&nbsp;E Milne,&nbsp;M Jones","doi":"10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The non-invasive neuromodulation technique tDCS offers the promise of a low cost tool for both research and clinical applications in psychology, psychiatry and neuroscience. However, findings regarding its efficacy are often equivocal. A key issue is that the clinical and cognitive applications studied are often complex and thus effects of tDCS are difficult to predict given its known effects on the basic underlying neurophysiology, namely alterations in cortical inhibition-excitation balance. As such, it may be beneficial to assess the effects of tDCS in tasks whose performance has a clear link to cortical inhibition-excitation balance such as the visual orientation discrimination task (ODT). In prior studies in our laboratory no practise effects were found during 2 consecutive runs of the ODT, thus in the current investigation, to examine the effects of tDCS, subjects received 10 minutes of 2mA occipital tDCS (sham, anode, cathode) between a first and second run of ODT. Surprisingly, subjects' performance significantly improved in the second run of ODT compared to the first one regardless of the tDCS stimulation type they received (anodal, cathodal, or sham-tDCS). Possible causes for such an improvement could have been due to either a generic 'placebo' effect of tDCS (as all subjects received some form of tDCS) or an increased delay period between the two runs of ODT of the current study compared to our previous work (10 minutes duration required to administer tDCS as opposed to ~2 minutes in previous studies as a 'break'). As such, we tested these two possibilities with a subsequent experiment in which subjects received 2 minutes or 10 minutes delay between the 2 runs (with no tDCS) or 10 minutes of sham-tDCS. Only sham-tDCS resulted in improved performance thus these data add to a growing literature suggesting that tDCS has powerful placebo effect that may occur even in the absence of active cortical modulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effects of tDCS on Visual Orientation Discrimination Task Performance: 'The possible influence of placebo'.\",\"authors\":\"A BinDawood,&nbsp;A Dickinson,&nbsp;A Aytemur,&nbsp;C Howarth,&nbsp;E Milne,&nbsp;M Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The non-invasive neuromodulation technique tDCS offers the promise of a low cost tool for both research and clinical applications in psychology, psychiatry and neuroscience. However, findings regarding its efficacy are often equivocal. A key issue is that the clinical and cognitive applications studied are often complex and thus effects of tDCS are difficult to predict given its known effects on the basic underlying neurophysiology, namely alterations in cortical inhibition-excitation balance. As such, it may be beneficial to assess the effects of tDCS in tasks whose performance has a clear link to cortical inhibition-excitation balance such as the visual orientation discrimination task (ODT). In prior studies in our laboratory no practise effects were found during 2 consecutive runs of the ODT, thus in the current investigation, to examine the effects of tDCS, subjects received 10 minutes of 2mA occipital tDCS (sham, anode, cathode) between a first and second run of ODT. Surprisingly, subjects' performance significantly improved in the second run of ODT compared to the first one regardless of the tDCS stimulation type they received (anodal, cathodal, or sham-tDCS). Possible causes for such an improvement could have been due to either a generic 'placebo' effect of tDCS (as all subjects received some form of tDCS) or an increased delay period between the two runs of ODT of the current study compared to our previous work (10 minutes duration required to administer tDCS as opposed to ~2 minutes in previous studies as a 'break'). As such, we tested these two possibilities with a subsequent experiment in which subjects received 2 minutes or 10 minutes delay between the 2 runs (with no tDCS) or 10 minutes of sham-tDCS. Only sham-tDCS resulted in improved performance thus these data add to a growing literature suggesting that tDCS has powerful placebo effect that may occur even in the absence of active cortical modulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

无创神经调节技术tDCS为心理学、精神病学和神经科学的研究和临床应用提供了一种低成本的工具。然而,关于其功效的发现往往是模棱两可的。一个关键的问题是,临床和认知应用研究往往是复杂的,因此很难预测tDCS的作用,因为它已知的作用是基本的潜在神经生理学,即皮层抑制-兴奋平衡的改变。因此,评估tDCS在表现与皮层抑制-兴奋平衡有明显联系的任务中的效果可能是有益的,例如视觉定向辨别任务(ODT)。在我们实验室之前的研究中,在连续两次的ODT中没有发现练习效果,因此在当前的调查中,为了检查tDCS的效果,受试者在第一次和第二次ODT之间接受10分钟的2mA枕部tDCS(假、阳极、阴极)。令人惊讶的是,与第一次相比,受试者在第二次ODT中的表现显著提高,而不管他们接受的是何种tDCS刺激类型(阳极、阴极或假tDCS)。这种改善的可能原因可能是由于tDCS的一般“安慰剂”效应(因为所有受试者都接受了某种形式的tDCS),或者与我们之前的工作相比,当前研究中两次ODT之间的延迟时间增加(施用tDCS所需的时间为10分钟,而之前的研究中约为2分钟作为“休息”)。因此,我们在随后的实验中测试了这两种可能性,在实验中,受试者在两次运行(没有tDCS)之间接受2分钟或10分钟的延迟或10分钟的假tDCS。只有假tDCS导致了性能的提高,因此这些数据增加了越来越多的文献,表明tDCS具有强大的安慰剂效应,即使在没有活跃的皮层调节的情况下也可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the effects of tDCS on Visual Orientation Discrimination Task Performance: 'The possible influence of placebo'.

The non-invasive neuromodulation technique tDCS offers the promise of a low cost tool for both research and clinical applications in psychology, psychiatry and neuroscience. However, findings regarding its efficacy are often equivocal. A key issue is that the clinical and cognitive applications studied are often complex and thus effects of tDCS are difficult to predict given its known effects on the basic underlying neurophysiology, namely alterations in cortical inhibition-excitation balance. As such, it may be beneficial to assess the effects of tDCS in tasks whose performance has a clear link to cortical inhibition-excitation balance such as the visual orientation discrimination task (ODT). In prior studies in our laboratory no practise effects were found during 2 consecutive runs of the ODT, thus in the current investigation, to examine the effects of tDCS, subjects received 10 minutes of 2mA occipital tDCS (sham, anode, cathode) between a first and second run of ODT. Surprisingly, subjects' performance significantly improved in the second run of ODT compared to the first one regardless of the tDCS stimulation type they received (anodal, cathodal, or sham-tDCS). Possible causes for such an improvement could have been due to either a generic 'placebo' effect of tDCS (as all subjects received some form of tDCS) or an increased delay period between the two runs of ODT of the current study compared to our previous work (10 minutes duration required to administer tDCS as opposed to ~2 minutes in previous studies as a 'break'). As such, we tested these two possibilities with a subsequent experiment in which subjects received 2 minutes or 10 minutes delay between the 2 runs (with no tDCS) or 10 minutes of sham-tDCS. Only sham-tDCS resulted in improved performance thus these data add to a growing literature suggesting that tDCS has powerful placebo effect that may occur even in the absence of active cortical modulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信