小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病异基因造血干细胞移植在全身照射和环磷酰胺调节下加用硫替帕

IF 4.3 Q1 Medicine
Vasant Chinnabhandar , Steven Tran , Rosemary Sutton , Peter J. Shaw , Francoise Mechinaud , Catherine Cole , Heather Tapp , Lochie Teague , Chris Fraser , Tracey A. O'Brien , Richard Mitchell , Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) Transplantation and Cellular Therapy in Children (TACTIC) Group
{"title":"小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病异基因造血干细胞移植在全身照射和环磷酰胺调节下加用硫替帕","authors":"Vasant Chinnabhandar ,&nbsp;Steven Tran ,&nbsp;Rosemary Sutton ,&nbsp;Peter J. Shaw ,&nbsp;Francoise Mechinaud ,&nbsp;Catherine Cole ,&nbsp;Heather Tapp ,&nbsp;Lochie Teague ,&nbsp;Chris Fraser ,&nbsp;Tracey A. O'Brien ,&nbsp;Richard Mitchell ,&nbsp;Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) Transplantation and Cellular Therapy in Children (TACTIC) Group","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Total body irradiation (TBI)/cyclophosphamide (CY) is a standard-of-care conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study sought to identify whether the addition of thiotepa (TT) to TBI/CY improves HSCT outcomes for pediatric patients with ALL. A retrospective analysis was performed on 347 pediatric ALL patients who underwent HSCT between 1995 and 2015, with 242 receiving TBI/CY/TT and 105 patients receiving TBI/CY. There were no statistical differences in age, donor source, or complete remission status between the 2 groups. Comparison of the TBI/CY/TT versus TBI/CY groups demonstrated no difference in transplant-related mortality at 1 (11% versus 11%), 5 (13% versus 16%), or 10 years (16% versus 16%). There was lower relapse in the TBI/CY/TT group at 1 (14% versus 26%), 5 (24% versus 36%), 10 (26% versus 37%), and 15 years (26% versus 37%) (<em>P</em>= .02) but was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. The TBI/CY/TT group showed a trend toward improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 (59% versus 47%), 10 (56% versus 46%), and 15 years (49% versus 40%) (<em>P</em> = .05) but was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Comparing overall survival at 5 (62% versus 53%), 10 (57% versus 50%), and 15 years (50% versus 44%) demonstrated no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The addition of thiotepa to TBI/CY demonstrated no increase in transplant-related mortality for pediatric ALL HSCT but was unable to demonstrate significant benefit in disease control. Minimal residual disease status remained the key risk factor impacting both relapse and DFS. More studies are warranted to better clarify the benefits of using thiotepa in conditioning for ALL HSCT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":"26 11","pages":"Pages 2068-2074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.028","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of Thiotepa to Total Body Irradiation and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia\",\"authors\":\"Vasant Chinnabhandar ,&nbsp;Steven Tran ,&nbsp;Rosemary Sutton ,&nbsp;Peter J. Shaw ,&nbsp;Francoise Mechinaud ,&nbsp;Catherine Cole ,&nbsp;Heather Tapp ,&nbsp;Lochie Teague ,&nbsp;Chris Fraser ,&nbsp;Tracey A. O'Brien ,&nbsp;Richard Mitchell ,&nbsp;Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) Transplantation and Cellular Therapy in Children (TACTIC) Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Total body irradiation (TBI)/cyclophosphamide (CY) is a standard-of-care conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study sought to identify whether the addition of thiotepa (TT) to TBI/CY improves HSCT outcomes for pediatric patients with ALL. A retrospective analysis was performed on 347 pediatric ALL patients who underwent HSCT between 1995 and 2015, with 242 receiving TBI/CY/TT and 105 patients receiving TBI/CY. There were no statistical differences in age, donor source, or complete remission status between the 2 groups. Comparison of the TBI/CY/TT versus TBI/CY groups demonstrated no difference in transplant-related mortality at 1 (11% versus 11%), 5 (13% versus 16%), or 10 years (16% versus 16%). There was lower relapse in the TBI/CY/TT group at 1 (14% versus 26%), 5 (24% versus 36%), 10 (26% versus 37%), and 15 years (26% versus 37%) (<em>P</em>= .02) but was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. The TBI/CY/TT group showed a trend toward improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 (59% versus 47%), 10 (56% versus 46%), and 15 years (49% versus 40%) (<em>P</em> = .05) but was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Comparing overall survival at 5 (62% versus 53%), 10 (57% versus 50%), and 15 years (50% versus 44%) demonstrated no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The addition of thiotepa to TBI/CY demonstrated no increase in transplant-related mortality for pediatric ALL HSCT but was unable to demonstrate significant benefit in disease control. Minimal residual disease status remained the key risk factor impacting both relapse and DFS. More studies are warranted to better clarify the benefits of using thiotepa in conditioning for ALL HSCT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"26 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2068-2074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.028\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083879120304614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083879120304614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

全身照射(TBI)/环磷酰胺(CY)是异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的标准治疗方案。本研究旨在确定在TBI/CY中添加硫替帕(TT)是否能改善ALL患儿的HSCT结果。回顾性分析了1995 - 2015年间347例接受HSCT的儿科ALL患者,其中242例接受TBI/CY/TT治疗,105例接受TBI/CY治疗。两组患者在年龄、供体来源或完全缓解状态方面无统计学差异。TBI/CY/TT组与TBI/CY组的比较显示,1年(11%对11%)、5年(13%对16%)或10年(16%对16%)的移植相关死亡率无差异。TBI/CY/TT组的复发率较低,分别为1年(14%对26%)、5年(24%对36%)、10年(26%对37%)和15年(26%对37%)(P= 0.02),但多因素分析差异无统计学意义。TBI/CY/TT组在5年(59%对47%)、10年(56%对46%)和15年(49%对40%)时显示无病生存(DFS)改善的趋势(P = 0.05),但在多变量分析中无统计学意义。比较5年(62%对53%)、10年(57%对50%)和15年(50%对44%)的总生存率,两组间无统计学差异。在TBI/CY中添加硫替帕没有增加儿童ALL造血干细胞移植的移植相关死亡率,但在疾病控制方面无法显示出显著的益处。最小残留疾病状态仍然是影响复发和DFS的关键危险因素。需要更多的研究来更好地阐明使用硫替帕治疗ALL HSCT的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of Thiotepa to Total Body Irradiation and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Total body irradiation (TBI)/cyclophosphamide (CY) is a standard-of-care conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study sought to identify whether the addition of thiotepa (TT) to TBI/CY improves HSCT outcomes for pediatric patients with ALL. A retrospective analysis was performed on 347 pediatric ALL patients who underwent HSCT between 1995 and 2015, with 242 receiving TBI/CY/TT and 105 patients receiving TBI/CY. There were no statistical differences in age, donor source, or complete remission status between the 2 groups. Comparison of the TBI/CY/TT versus TBI/CY groups demonstrated no difference in transplant-related mortality at 1 (11% versus 11%), 5 (13% versus 16%), or 10 years (16% versus 16%). There was lower relapse in the TBI/CY/TT group at 1 (14% versus 26%), 5 (24% versus 36%), 10 (26% versus 37%), and 15 years (26% versus 37%) (P= .02) but was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. The TBI/CY/TT group showed a trend toward improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 (59% versus 47%), 10 (56% versus 46%), and 15 years (49% versus 40%) (P = .05) but was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Comparing overall survival at 5 (62% versus 53%), 10 (57% versus 50%), and 15 years (50% versus 44%) demonstrated no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The addition of thiotepa to TBI/CY demonstrated no increase in transplant-related mortality for pediatric ALL HSCT but was unable to demonstrate significant benefit in disease control. Minimal residual disease status remained the key risk factor impacting both relapse and DFS. More studies are warranted to better clarify the benefits of using thiotepa in conditioning for ALL HSCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation publishes original research reports, reviews, editorials, commentaries, letters to the editor, and hypotheses and is the official publication of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. The journal focuses on current technology and knowledge in the interdisciplinary field of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信