{"title":"18F-FBPA d -异构体对胶质瘤和炎症分化肿瘤PET的评价","authors":"Nobuto Hirai, Tadashi Watabe, Shushi Nagamori, Pattama Wiriyasermkul, Yoko Tanaka, Victor Romanov, Sadahiro Naka, Yasukazu Kanai, Yuwei Liu, Naoki Tani, Tatsuya Sakai, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Eku Shimosegawa, Yoshikatsu Kanai, Jun Hatazawa","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2020.47399.1321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>L-4-borono-2-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-phenylalanine (L-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA), a substrate of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), is a tumor-specific probe used in positron emission tomography (PET). On the other hand, it has not been examined whether another isomer D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA accumulates specifically in the tumor. Here, we compared the accumulation of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA in C6 glioma and inflammation to evaluate the performance of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA as a tumor-specific probe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HEK293-LAT1 and HEK293-LAT2 cells were tested for [<sup>14</sup>C]-leucine or [<sup>14</sup>C]-alanine transport, and IC<sub>50</sub> values of L- and D-FBPA were evaluated in both cell types. PET was conducted in rat xenograft model of C6 glioma with LAT1 expression and model of turpentine oil-induced subcutaneous inflammation (n=10 for both models). The concentrations of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA were compared between glioma and inflammatory lesion using standardized uptake value (SUV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to L-FBPA, which inhibited substrate uptake in both HEK293-LAT1 and -LAT2 cells, D-FBPA showed no inhibitory effect on both cells, suggesting low transporter selectivity of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA against LAT1 and LAT2. Static PET analysis showed low accumulation of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA in C6 glioma and inflammatory lesion (SUV<sub>max</sub>=0.80±0.16, 0.56±0.09, respectively). Although there was a statistical difference in SUV<sub>max</sub> between these tissues, it was difficult to distinguish glioma from inflammation on the PET image due to its low uptake level. Therefore, it was suggested that D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA is not a suitable tumor-specific probe for oncology PET in contrast to L-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA is not a LAT1-specific PET probe and shows low uptake in C6 glioma, indicating its unsuitability as a tumor diagnosis PET probe.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":"8 2","pages":"102-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354242/pdf/AOJNMB-8-102.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of D-isomer of <sup>18</sup>F-FBPA for oncology PET focusing on the differentiation of glioma and inflammation.\",\"authors\":\"Nobuto Hirai, Tadashi Watabe, Shushi Nagamori, Pattama Wiriyasermkul, Yoko Tanaka, Victor Romanov, Sadahiro Naka, Yasukazu Kanai, Yuwei Liu, Naoki Tani, Tatsuya Sakai, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Eku Shimosegawa, Yoshikatsu Kanai, Jun Hatazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/AOJNMB.2020.47399.1321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>L-4-borono-2-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-phenylalanine (L-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA), a substrate of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), is a tumor-specific probe used in positron emission tomography (PET). On the other hand, it has not been examined whether another isomer D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA accumulates specifically in the tumor. Here, we compared the accumulation of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA in C6 glioma and inflammation to evaluate the performance of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA as a tumor-specific probe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HEK293-LAT1 and HEK293-LAT2 cells were tested for [<sup>14</sup>C]-leucine or [<sup>14</sup>C]-alanine transport, and IC<sub>50</sub> values of L- and D-FBPA were evaluated in both cell types. PET was conducted in rat xenograft model of C6 glioma with LAT1 expression and model of turpentine oil-induced subcutaneous inflammation (n=10 for both models). The concentrations of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA were compared between glioma and inflammatory lesion using standardized uptake value (SUV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In contrast to L-FBPA, which inhibited substrate uptake in both HEK293-LAT1 and -LAT2 cells, D-FBPA showed no inhibitory effect on both cells, suggesting low transporter selectivity of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA against LAT1 and LAT2. Static PET analysis showed low accumulation of D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA in C6 glioma and inflammatory lesion (SUV<sub>max</sub>=0.80±0.16, 0.56±0.09, respectively). Although there was a statistical difference in SUV<sub>max</sub> between these tissues, it was difficult to distinguish glioma from inflammation on the PET image due to its low uptake level. Therefore, it was suggested that D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA is not a suitable tumor-specific probe for oncology PET in contrast to L-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that D-[<sup>18</sup>F]FBPA is not a LAT1-specific PET probe and shows low uptake in C6 glioma, indicating its unsuitability as a tumor diagnosis PET probe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"102-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354242/pdf/AOJNMB-8-102.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2020.47399.1321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2020.47399.1321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of D-isomer of 18F-FBPA for oncology PET focusing on the differentiation of glioma and inflammation.
Objectives: L-4-borono-2-18F-fluoro-phenylalanine (L-[18F]FBPA), a substrate of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), is a tumor-specific probe used in positron emission tomography (PET). On the other hand, it has not been examined whether another isomer D-[18F]FBPA accumulates specifically in the tumor. Here, we compared the accumulation of D-[18F]FBPA in C6 glioma and inflammation to evaluate the performance of D-[18F]FBPA as a tumor-specific probe.
Methods: HEK293-LAT1 and HEK293-LAT2 cells were tested for [14C]-leucine or [14C]-alanine transport, and IC50 values of L- and D-FBPA were evaluated in both cell types. PET was conducted in rat xenograft model of C6 glioma with LAT1 expression and model of turpentine oil-induced subcutaneous inflammation (n=10 for both models). The concentrations of D-[18F]FBPA were compared between glioma and inflammatory lesion using standardized uptake value (SUV).
Results: In contrast to L-FBPA, which inhibited substrate uptake in both HEK293-LAT1 and -LAT2 cells, D-FBPA showed no inhibitory effect on both cells, suggesting low transporter selectivity of D-[18F]FBPA against LAT1 and LAT2. Static PET analysis showed low accumulation of D-[18F]FBPA in C6 glioma and inflammatory lesion (SUVmax=0.80±0.16, 0.56±0.09, respectively). Although there was a statistical difference in SUVmax between these tissues, it was difficult to distinguish glioma from inflammation on the PET image due to its low uptake level. Therefore, it was suggested that D-[18F]FBPA is not a suitable tumor-specific probe for oncology PET in contrast to L-[18F]FBPA.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that D-[18F]FBPA is not a LAT1-specific PET probe and shows low uptake in C6 glioma, indicating its unsuitability as a tumor diagnosis PET probe.