利特莫韦预防减少造血细胞移植后巨细胞病毒(CMV)疾病高风险患者的负担

IF 4.3 Q1 Medicine
Joyce J. Johnsrud , Isabelle T. Nguyen , Walter Domingo , Balasubramanian Narasimhan , Bradley Efron , Janice (Wes) Brown
{"title":"利特莫韦预防减少造血细胞移植后巨细胞病毒(CMV)疾病高风险患者的负担","authors":"Joyce J. Johnsrud ,&nbsp;Isabelle T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Walter Domingo ,&nbsp;Balasubramanian Narasimhan ,&nbsp;Bradley Efron ,&nbsp;Janice (Wes) Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite effective therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. At particular risk are recipients of alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood (UCB), haploidentical transplants (haplo), or patients conditioned with T-cell depleting regimens such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With the approval of letermovir, its impact on high-risk patients is of particular interest. To evaluate the impact of letermovir prophylaxis at our center, we performed a retrospective analysis of 114 high-risk patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis (LET PPX) between January 2018 through December 2019, including 30 UCB and 22 haplo recipients, compared with 637 historical controls with comparable risk between January 2013 and December 2019. By post-transplant day 100 (D+100), letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of both CMV DNAemia compared with controls (45.37% versus 74.1%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and clinically significant CMV infection (12.04% versus 48.82%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The impact of LET PPX was even more profound on the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CSI), defined as the administration of antiviral therapy as preemptive therapy for CMV DNAemia or treatment for CMV disease. CSI was significantly lower in haplo recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (13.64% versus 73.33%; <em>P</em>= .02) and UCB recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (3.45% versus 37.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). No patients on LET primary PPX developed CMV disease in any treatment group by D+100 compared with controls (0% versus 5.34%, respectively; <em>P</em> = .006). Patients on LET PPX had fewer hospitalizations involving initiation of anti-CMV therapy compared with controls (0.93% versus 15.23%, respectively). Our analysis of the largest cohort of patients at high risk for CMV reactivation published to date demonstrates that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces the number of patients who receive CMV-active antiviral therapy for either DNAemia or disease due to CMV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.002","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letermovir Prophylaxis Decreases Burden of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Patients at High Risk for CMV Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant\",\"authors\":\"Joyce J. Johnsrud ,&nbsp;Isabelle T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Walter Domingo ,&nbsp;Balasubramanian Narasimhan ,&nbsp;Bradley Efron ,&nbsp;Janice (Wes) Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite effective therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. At particular risk are recipients of alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood (UCB), haploidentical transplants (haplo), or patients conditioned with T-cell depleting regimens such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With the approval of letermovir, its impact on high-risk patients is of particular interest. To evaluate the impact of letermovir prophylaxis at our center, we performed a retrospective analysis of 114 high-risk patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis (LET PPX) between January 2018 through December 2019, including 30 UCB and 22 haplo recipients, compared with 637 historical controls with comparable risk between January 2013 and December 2019. By post-transplant day 100 (D+100), letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of both CMV DNAemia compared with controls (45.37% versus 74.1%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and clinically significant CMV infection (12.04% versus 48.82%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The impact of LET PPX was even more profound on the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CSI), defined as the administration of antiviral therapy as preemptive therapy for CMV DNAemia or treatment for CMV disease. CSI was significantly lower in haplo recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (13.64% versus 73.33%; <em>P</em>= .02) and UCB recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (3.45% versus 37.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). No patients on LET primary PPX developed CMV disease in any treatment group by D+100 compared with controls (0% versus 5.34%, respectively; <em>P</em> = .006). Patients on LET PPX had fewer hospitalizations involving initiation of anti-CMV therapy compared with controls (0.93% versus 15.23%, respectively). Our analysis of the largest cohort of patients at high risk for CMV reactivation published to date demonstrates that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces the number of patients who receive CMV-active antiviral therapy for either DNAemia or disease due to CMV.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083879120304110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083879120304110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

尽管有有效的治疗方法,巨细胞病毒(CMV)仍然对造血细胞移植受者的发病率和死亡率产生重大影响。接受脐带血(UCB)、单倍体移植(haplo)等替代移植的患者或接受t细胞消耗方案(如抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG))治疗的患者尤其危险。随着letermovir的批准,其对高危患者的影响受到特别关注。为了评估letermovir预防在我们中心的影响,我们对2018年1月至2019年12月期间接受letermovir作为预防(LET PPX)的114名高危患者进行了回顾性分析,其中包括30名UCB和22名haplo接受者,与2013年1月至2019年12月期间具有相当风险的637名历史对照进行了比较。移植后第100天(D+100),与对照组相比,雷替韦预防显著降低了CMV dna血症的发生率(45.37%对74.1%;P & lt;.001)和有临床意义的巨细胞病毒感染(12.04% vs 48.82%;P & lt;措施)。LET PPX对临床显著巨细胞病毒感染(CSI)的发生率的影响更为深远,CSI定义为给予抗病毒治疗作为CMV dna血症的先发制人治疗或CMV疾病的治疗。单倍体受体接受LET PPX治疗的CSI显著低于对照组(13.64% vs 73.33%;P= .02)和接受LET PPX治疗的UCB患者(3.45% vs 37.5%;P & lt;措施)。与对照组相比,任何治疗组的LET原发性PPX患者在D+100之前都没有发生巨细胞病毒疾病(分别为0%和5.34%;p = .006)。与对照组相比,接受LET PPX治疗的患者因开始抗巨细胞病毒治疗而住院的次数较少(分别为0.93%和15.23%)。我们对迄今为止发表的CMV再激活高风险患者的最大队列分析表明,莱特莫韦预防可显著减少因dna血症或CMV引起的疾病接受CMV活性抗病毒治疗的患者数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Letermovir Prophylaxis Decreases Burden of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Patients at High Risk for CMV Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Despite effective therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. At particular risk are recipients of alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood (UCB), haploidentical transplants (haplo), or patients conditioned with T-cell depleting regimens such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With the approval of letermovir, its impact on high-risk patients is of particular interest. To evaluate the impact of letermovir prophylaxis at our center, we performed a retrospective analysis of 114 high-risk patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis (LET PPX) between January 2018 through December 2019, including 30 UCB and 22 haplo recipients, compared with 637 historical controls with comparable risk between January 2013 and December 2019. By post-transplant day 100 (D+100), letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of both CMV DNAemia compared with controls (45.37% versus 74.1%; P < .001) and clinically significant CMV infection (12.04% versus 48.82%; P < .001). The impact of LET PPX was even more profound on the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CSI), defined as the administration of antiviral therapy as preemptive therapy for CMV DNAemia or treatment for CMV disease. CSI was significantly lower in haplo recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (13.64% versus 73.33%; P= .02) and UCB recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (3.45% versus 37.5%; P < .001). No patients on LET primary PPX developed CMV disease in any treatment group by D+100 compared with controls (0% versus 5.34%, respectively; P = .006). Patients on LET PPX had fewer hospitalizations involving initiation of anti-CMV therapy compared with controls (0.93% versus 15.23%, respectively). Our analysis of the largest cohort of patients at high risk for CMV reactivation published to date demonstrates that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces the number of patients who receive CMV-active antiviral therapy for either DNAemia or disease due to CMV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation publishes original research reports, reviews, editorials, commentaries, letters to the editor, and hypotheses and is the official publication of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. The journal focuses on current technology and knowledge in the interdisciplinary field of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信