最新一代支架:是时候复兴生物可吸收支架了吗?

Q3 Medicine
Minerva cardioangiologica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-08 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05188-9
Andrea Buono, Alfonso Ielasi, Antonio Colombo
{"title":"最新一代支架:是时候复兴生物可吸收支架了吗?","authors":"Andrea Buono,&nbsp;Alfonso Ielasi,&nbsp;Antonio Colombo","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05188-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have been introduced in the last decade in percutaneous coronary interventions. Despite several advantages being postulated, the negative results from the mid-term follow-up of the Absorb trials have tempered enthusiasm for these innovative devices. The Absorb scaffold was associated with higher rates of target-lesion failure and scaffold thrombosis when compared to current metallic stents, and for this reason was withdrawn from the market. This failure has to be considered multifactorial, involving technical and technological aspects. Continuous engineering refinements in BRS technology, means newer-generation devices are available in clinical practice, and several more are under preclinical and clinical assessment. Thinner and smaller struts, associated with a faster resorption and reendothelialization process, are at the basis of promising preclinical results for new BRS. In this review we summarize the Absorb scaffold experience and focus on the latest evidence concerning emerging new BRS, to explore if a \"BRS revival\" is conceivable.</p>","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":"68 5","pages":"415-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latest generation stents: is it time to revive the bioresorbable scaffold?\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Buono,&nbsp;Alfonso Ielasi,&nbsp;Antonio Colombo\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05188-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have been introduced in the last decade in percutaneous coronary interventions. Despite several advantages being postulated, the negative results from the mid-term follow-up of the Absorb trials have tempered enthusiasm for these innovative devices. The Absorb scaffold was associated with higher rates of target-lesion failure and scaffold thrombosis when compared to current metallic stents, and for this reason was withdrawn from the market. This failure has to be considered multifactorial, involving technical and technological aspects. Continuous engineering refinements in BRS technology, means newer-generation devices are available in clinical practice, and several more are under preclinical and clinical assessment. Thinner and smaller struts, associated with a faster resorption and reendothelialization process, are at the basis of promising preclinical results for new BRS. In this review we summarize the Absorb scaffold experience and focus on the latest evidence concerning emerging new BRS, to explore if a \\\"BRS revival\\\" is conceivable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"volume\":\"68 5\",\"pages\":\"415-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05188-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05188-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

生物可吸收支架(BRS)在过去十年中被引入经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。尽管设想了一些优点,但吸收试验中期随访的负面结果削弱了对这些创新设备的热情。与目前的金属支架相比,吸收支架具有更高的靶病变失败率和支架血栓形成率,因此退出市场。必须考虑到这种失败是多方面的,涉及技术和技术方面。BRS技术的持续工程改进意味着新一代设备可用于临床实践,还有一些正在进行临床前和临床评估。更薄和更小的支架,与更快的吸收和再内皮化过程相关,是新型BRS临床前结果的基础。在这篇综述中,我们总结了吸收支架的经验,并重点介绍了有关新出现的BRS的最新证据,以探讨“BRS复兴”是否可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latest generation stents: is it time to revive the bioresorbable scaffold?

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) have been introduced in the last decade in percutaneous coronary interventions. Despite several advantages being postulated, the negative results from the mid-term follow-up of the Absorb trials have tempered enthusiasm for these innovative devices. The Absorb scaffold was associated with higher rates of target-lesion failure and scaffold thrombosis when compared to current metallic stents, and for this reason was withdrawn from the market. This failure has to be considered multifactorial, involving technical and technological aspects. Continuous engineering refinements in BRS technology, means newer-generation devices are available in clinical practice, and several more are under preclinical and clinical assessment. Thinner and smaller struts, associated with a faster resorption and reendothelialization process, are at the basis of promising preclinical results for new BRS. In this review we summarize the Absorb scaffold experience and focus on the latest evidence concerning emerging new BRS, to explore if a "BRS revival" is conceivable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardioangiologica
Minerva cardioangiologica CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信