生物标志物的诊断效能研究应采用“一门”设计。

Xu-Xiao Guo, Shu-Mei Bai
{"title":"生物标志物的诊断效能研究应采用“一门”设计。","authors":"Xu-Xiao Guo,&nbsp;Shu-Mei Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. The first draft of this article proposes \"Please authors answer a question: was there only 43 patients with diagnosed gastric cancer from April 2018 to July 2018?\" Is it to know whether the researchers chose 43 patients because of fewer cases or intentionally fewer? The reviewer's \"response reviewers\" admitted \"it's better to add a benign disease group\" and \"chose 43 patients with diagnosed gastric cancer randomly for our validation,\" which confirmed my opinion \"have design flaws both in enroll subjects and the number of cases\". So after getting the reply from the original author, I deleted the above sentence. This time amend \"43 patients\" on line 43 to \"43 patients which random selection rather than all patients in the study time window\". 2. Some revision has been highlighted in red. 3. We re-edit the article sentence by sentence in English to make it more in line with the English expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":504940,"journal":{"name":"Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"One-gate\\\" design should be used for the study of the diagnostic efficacy of biological markers.\",\"authors\":\"Xu-Xiao Guo,&nbsp;Shu-Mei Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>1. The first draft of this article proposes \\\"Please authors answer a question: was there only 43 patients with diagnosed gastric cancer from April 2018 to July 2018?\\\" Is it to know whether the researchers chose 43 patients because of fewer cases or intentionally fewer? The reviewer's \\\"response reviewers\\\" admitted \\\"it's better to add a benign disease group\\\" and \\\"chose 43 patients with diagnosed gastric cancer randomly for our validation,\\\" which confirmed my opinion \\\"have design flaws both in enroll subjects and the number of cases\\\". So after getting the reply from the original author, I deleted the above sentence. This time amend \\\"43 patients\\\" on line 43 to \\\"43 patients which random selection rather than all patients in the study time window\\\". 2. Some revision has been highlighted in red. 3. We re-edit the article sentence by sentence in English to make it more in line with the English expression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 本文初稿提出“请作者回答一个问题:2018年4月至2018年7月,诊断为胃癌的患者是否只有43例?”是为了知道研究人员选择43名患者是因为病例少还是故意少?审稿人的“回应审稿人”承认“最好增加一个良性疾病组”,“随机选择43例诊断为胃癌的患者进行验证”,这证实了我的观点“在入组对象和病例数量上都存在设计缺陷”。所以在得到原作者的回复后,我删除了上面这句话。这次将第43行“43名患者”修改为“随机选择的43名患者,而不是研究时间窗内的所有患者”。2. 一些修改已用红色突出显示。3.我们用英语逐句重新编辑文章,使其更符合英语表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"One-gate" design should be used for the study of the diagnostic efficacy of biological markers.

1. The first draft of this article proposes "Please authors answer a question: was there only 43 patients with diagnosed gastric cancer from April 2018 to July 2018?" Is it to know whether the researchers chose 43 patients because of fewer cases or intentionally fewer? The reviewer's "response reviewers" admitted "it's better to add a benign disease group" and "chose 43 patients with diagnosed gastric cancer randomly for our validation," which confirmed my opinion "have design flaws both in enroll subjects and the number of cases". So after getting the reply from the original author, I deleted the above sentence. This time amend "43 patients" on line 43 to "43 patients which random selection rather than all patients in the study time window". 2. Some revision has been highlighted in red. 3. We re-edit the article sentence by sentence in English to make it more in line with the English expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信