社区独居老人的家访认知干预。

Juyoun Lee, Ae Young Lee
{"title":"社区独居老人的家访认知干预。","authors":"Juyoun Lee,&nbsp;Ae Young Lee","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2020.19.2.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The elderly living alone feel lonelier and more isolated than do those live with others, and they are at higher risk for cognitive decline and depression. This study aimed to assess whether a home-visiting cognitive intervention (HCI) can have positive effects on cognitive improvement for the elderly who living alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HCI was conducted from April 2016 to November 2019. Every elder who lived alone and 2 matched partners met for 8 weeks once a week. The partners visited participants' home and did the HCI which composed of cognitive training and cognitive stimulation activities. The Mini-Mental State Examination-dementia screening (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Korean version of instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL), and the Social Support Scale (SSS) were evaluated before and after HCI to compare the effect of HCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 participants showed significant improvements in MMSE, GDS, K-IADL, and SSS. The MMSE and GDS scores were significantly improved after HCI in both the normal cognition (NC, <i>n</i>=210) and cognitive impairment (CI, <i>n</i>=48) groups. The cognitive effect of HCI for CI was higher than for NC. Among the NC, the magnitude of cognitive improvement was greater in the higher educated group (above 7 years) than in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Active cognitive interventions could provide possible benefits to improve cognition, emotion, and functional abilities. Regular cognitive-care services like HCI are necessary to reduce dementia risk for the elderly who live alone in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":"19 2","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/3e/dnd-19-65.PMC7326612.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-Visiting Cognitive Intervention for the Community-Dwelling Elderly Living Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Juyoun Lee,&nbsp;Ae Young Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.12779/dnd.2020.19.2.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The elderly living alone feel lonelier and more isolated than do those live with others, and they are at higher risk for cognitive decline and depression. This study aimed to assess whether a home-visiting cognitive intervention (HCI) can have positive effects on cognitive improvement for the elderly who living alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HCI was conducted from April 2016 to November 2019. Every elder who lived alone and 2 matched partners met for 8 weeks once a week. The partners visited participants' home and did the HCI which composed of cognitive training and cognitive stimulation activities. The Mini-Mental State Examination-dementia screening (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Korean version of instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL), and the Social Support Scale (SSS) were evaluated before and after HCI to compare the effect of HCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 258 participants showed significant improvements in MMSE, GDS, K-IADL, and SSS. The MMSE and GDS scores were significantly improved after HCI in both the normal cognition (NC, <i>n</i>=210) and cognitive impairment (CI, <i>n</i>=48) groups. The cognitive effect of HCI for CI was higher than for NC. Among the NC, the magnitude of cognitive improvement was greater in the higher educated group (above 7 years) than in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Active cognitive interventions could provide possible benefits to improve cognition, emotion, and functional abilities. Regular cognitive-care services like HCI are necessary to reduce dementia risk for the elderly who live alone in the community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"65-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/3e/dnd-19-65.PMC7326612.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2020.19.2.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2020.19.2.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景与目的:独居老人比与人同住的老人更感到孤独和孤立,认知能力下降和抑郁的风险更高。本研究旨在评估家访认知干预(HCI)是否能对独居老人的认知改善产生积极影响。方法:于2016年4月至2019年11月进行HCI。每个独居老人和两个配对的伴侣每周见面一次,为期8周。合作伙伴到被试家中进行由认知训练和认知刺激活动组成的HCI。采用简易精神状态检查-痴呆筛查(MMSE)、老年抑郁量表(GDS)、韩版日常生活工具性活动量表(K-IADL)和社会支持量表(SSS)进行HCI前后的评估,比较HCI的效果。结果:共有258名参与者在MMSE、GDS、K-IADL和SSS方面有显著改善。认知正常组(NC, n=210)和认知障碍组(CI, n=48)在HCI后MMSE和GDS评分均有显著提高。HCI对CI的认知效果高于NC。在NC组中,高学历组(7年以上)的认知改善幅度大于其他组。结论:积极的认知干预可能有助于改善认知、情绪和功能能力。像HCI这样的定期认知保健服务对于降低社区独居老人患痴呆症的风险是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Home-Visiting Cognitive Intervention for the Community-Dwelling Elderly Living Alone.

Home-Visiting Cognitive Intervention for the Community-Dwelling Elderly Living Alone.

Home-Visiting Cognitive Intervention for the Community-Dwelling Elderly Living Alone.

Home-Visiting Cognitive Intervention for the Community-Dwelling Elderly Living Alone.

Background and purpose: The elderly living alone feel lonelier and more isolated than do those live with others, and they are at higher risk for cognitive decline and depression. This study aimed to assess whether a home-visiting cognitive intervention (HCI) can have positive effects on cognitive improvement for the elderly who living alone.

Methods: HCI was conducted from April 2016 to November 2019. Every elder who lived alone and 2 matched partners met for 8 weeks once a week. The partners visited participants' home and did the HCI which composed of cognitive training and cognitive stimulation activities. The Mini-Mental State Examination-dementia screening (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Korean version of instrumental activities of daily living (K-IADL), and the Social Support Scale (SSS) were evaluated before and after HCI to compare the effect of HCI.

Results: A total of 258 participants showed significant improvements in MMSE, GDS, K-IADL, and SSS. The MMSE and GDS scores were significantly improved after HCI in both the normal cognition (NC, n=210) and cognitive impairment (CI, n=48) groups. The cognitive effect of HCI for CI was higher than for NC. Among the NC, the magnitude of cognitive improvement was greater in the higher educated group (above 7 years) than in the other groups.

Conclusions: Active cognitive interventions could provide possible benefits to improve cognition, emotion, and functional abilities. Regular cognitive-care services like HCI are necessary to reduce dementia risk for the elderly who live alone in the community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信