使用世界卫生组织指南评估巴基斯坦一家三级医院内分泌科的处方。

Advances in Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2020-05-30 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3705704
Majid Khan, Rahmat Ullah, Asaf Khan, Najm Ur-Rahman, Sadaqat Khan, Muhammad Riaz
{"title":"使用世界卫生组织指南评估巴基斯坦一家三级医院内分泌科的处方。","authors":"Majid Khan, Rahmat Ullah, Asaf Khan, Najm Ur-Rahman, Sadaqat Khan, Muhammad Riaz","doi":"10.1155/2020/3705704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is essential to follow World Health Organization drug prescribing indicators to ensure rational prescribing in every health care setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prescriptions in the endocrinology department, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), recommended Ghana guidelines for diabetes management and rational therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Concurrent and retrospective study design was used. The prescriptions of 100 diabetes patients were assessed for the type of medicine, dosage form, number of drugs, diabetes type, and deviation from standard guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a total of 100 prescriptions, the pattern was reported as injections (31%), antibiotics (18%), and metformin (31.1%). Half of the prescriptions were according to WHO guidelines. The number of drugs per prescription was reported at 5.2. A 70% rational approach was followed in prescribing. 81% of drugs were prescribed from the Essential Drug List (EDL) of the WHO. However, the National Essential Drug List (NEDL) was followed by 27%. The percentage of drugs on generic names was 0.7%. Eighty-four patients showed net improvement in health; 16 patients showed higher glycemic range at the time of discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusion of the present study indicates that WHO Ghana guidelines were not followed up to the mark to improve the overall health status of diabetic patients and rational prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7388,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Prescriptions in the Endocrinology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan Using World Health Organization Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Majid Khan, Rahmat Ullah, Asaf Khan, Najm Ur-Rahman, Sadaqat Khan, Muhammad Riaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/3705704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is essential to follow World Health Organization drug prescribing indicators to ensure rational prescribing in every health care setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prescriptions in the endocrinology department, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), recommended Ghana guidelines for diabetes management and rational therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Concurrent and retrospective study design was used. The prescriptions of 100 diabetes patients were assessed for the type of medicine, dosage form, number of drugs, diabetes type, and deviation from standard guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a total of 100 prescriptions, the pattern was reported as injections (31%), antibiotics (18%), and metformin (31.1%). Half of the prescriptions were according to WHO guidelines. The number of drugs per prescription was reported at 5.2. A 70% rational approach was followed in prescribing. 81% of drugs were prescribed from the Essential Drug List (EDL) of the WHO. However, the National Essential Drug List (NEDL) was followed by 27%. The percentage of drugs on generic names was 0.7%. Eighty-four patients showed net improvement in health; 16 patients showed higher glycemic range at the time of discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusion of the present study indicates that WHO Ghana guidelines were not followed up to the mark to improve the overall health status of diabetic patients and rational prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3705704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3705704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景必须遵循世界卫生组织的药物处方指标,以确保每个医疗机构都能合理处方:根据世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的加纳糖尿病管理和合理治疗指南,对内分泌科的处方进行评估:方法:采用并行和回顾性研究设计。方法:采用并行和回顾性研究设计,对 100 名糖尿病患者的处方进行评估,包括药物类型、剂型、药物数量、糖尿病类型以及与标准指南的偏差:结果:在总共 100 份处方中,报告的用药模式为注射剂(31%)、抗生素(18%)和二甲双胍(31.1%)。半数处方符合世界卫生组织的指南。据报告,每张处方的药物数量为 5.2 种。70% 的处方采用了合理的方法。81%的处方药来自世界卫生组织的基本药物清单(EDL)。然而,27%的处方遵循了《国家基本药物目录》(NEDL)。非专利药占 0.7%。84 名患者的健康状况得到了净改善;16 名患者出院时血糖范围有所提高:本研究的结论表明,世卫组织加纳办事处没有严格遵守世卫组织的指导方针,以改善糖尿病患者的总体健康状况和合理处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of Prescriptions in the Endocrinology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan Using World Health Organization Guidelines.

Assessment of Prescriptions in the Endocrinology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan Using World Health Organization Guidelines.

Background: It is essential to follow World Health Organization drug prescribing indicators to ensure rational prescribing in every health care setting.

Objective: To evaluate the prescriptions in the endocrinology department, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), recommended Ghana guidelines for diabetes management and rational therapy.

Methods: Concurrent and retrospective study design was used. The prescriptions of 100 diabetes patients were assessed for the type of medicine, dosage form, number of drugs, diabetes type, and deviation from standard guidelines.

Results: In a total of 100 prescriptions, the pattern was reported as injections (31%), antibiotics (18%), and metformin (31.1%). Half of the prescriptions were according to WHO guidelines. The number of drugs per prescription was reported at 5.2. A 70% rational approach was followed in prescribing. 81% of drugs were prescribed from the Essential Drug List (EDL) of the WHO. However, the National Essential Drug List (NEDL) was followed by 27%. The percentage of drugs on generic names was 0.7%. Eighty-four patients showed net improvement in health; 16 patients showed higher glycemic range at the time of discharge.

Conclusion: The conclusion of the present study indicates that WHO Ghana guidelines were not followed up to the mark to improve the overall health status of diabetic patients and rational prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信