人格神经科学和精神病理学:我们应该从生物学开始寻找神经层面的因素吗?

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2020-05-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2020.5
Neil McNaughton
{"title":"人格神经科学和精神病理学:我们应该从生物学开始寻找神经层面的因素吗?","authors":"Neil McNaughton","doi":"10.1017/pen.2020.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Personality is an abstraction used to explain consistency and coherency in an individual's pattern of affects, cognitions, desires and behaviors [ABCDs]\" (Revelle, 2007, p. 37). But personality research currently provides more a taxonomy of patterns than theories of fundamental causes. Psychiatric disorders can be viewed as involving extremes of personality but are diagnosed via symptom patterns not biological causes. Such surface-level taxonomic description is necessary for science, but consistent predictive explanation requires causal theory. Personality constructs, and especially their clinical extremes, should predict variation in ABCD patterns, with parsimony requiring the lowest effective causal level of explanation. But, even biologically inspired personality theories currently use an intuitive language-based approach for scale development that lacks biological anchors. I argue that teleonomic \"purpose\" explains the organisation and outputs of conserved brain emotion systems, where high activation is adaptive in specific situations but is otherwise maladaptive. Simple modulators of whole-system sensitivity evolved because the requisite adaptive level can vary across people and time. Sensitivity to a modulator is an abstract predictive personality factor that operates at the neural level but provides a causal explanation of both coherence and occasional apparent incoherence in ABCD variation. Neuromodulators impact all levels of the \"personality hierarchy\" from metatraits to aspects: stability appears altered by serotonergic drugs, neuroticism by ketamine and trait anxiety by simple anxiolytic drugs. Here, the tools of psychiatry transfer to personality research and imply both interaction between levels and oblique factor mappings to ABCD. On this view, much psychopathology reflects extremes of neural-level personality factors, and we can view much pharmacotherapy as temporarily altering personality. So, particularly for personality factors linked to basic emotions and their disorders, I think we should start with evolutionary biology and look directly at conserved neural-level modulators for our explanatory personality constructs and only invoke higher order, emergent, explanations when neural-level explanation fails.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2020.5","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors?\",\"authors\":\"Neil McNaughton\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pen.2020.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"Personality is an abstraction used to explain consistency and coherency in an individual's pattern of affects, cognitions, desires and behaviors [ABCDs]\\\" (Revelle, 2007, p. 37). But personality research currently provides more a taxonomy of patterns than theories of fundamental causes. Psychiatric disorders can be viewed as involving extremes of personality but are diagnosed via symptom patterns not biological causes. Such surface-level taxonomic description is necessary for science, but consistent predictive explanation requires causal theory. Personality constructs, and especially their clinical extremes, should predict variation in ABCD patterns, with parsimony requiring the lowest effective causal level of explanation. But, even biologically inspired personality theories currently use an intuitive language-based approach for scale development that lacks biological anchors. I argue that teleonomic \\\"purpose\\\" explains the organisation and outputs of conserved brain emotion systems, where high activation is adaptive in specific situations but is otherwise maladaptive. Simple modulators of whole-system sensitivity evolved because the requisite adaptive level can vary across people and time. Sensitivity to a modulator is an abstract predictive personality factor that operates at the neural level but provides a causal explanation of both coherence and occasional apparent incoherence in ABCD variation. Neuromodulators impact all levels of the \\\"personality hierarchy\\\" from metatraits to aspects: stability appears altered by serotonergic drugs, neuroticism by ketamine and trait anxiety by simple anxiolytic drugs. Here, the tools of psychiatry transfer to personality research and imply both interaction between levels and oblique factor mappings to ABCD. On this view, much psychopathology reflects extremes of neural-level personality factors, and we can view much pharmacotherapy as temporarily altering personality. So, particularly for personality factors linked to basic emotions and their disorders, I think we should start with evolutionary biology and look directly at conserved neural-level modulators for our explanatory personality constructs and only invoke higher order, emergent, explanations when neural-level explanation fails.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2020.5\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2020.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2020.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

“人格是一个抽象概念,用来解释个人的情感、认知、欲望和行为模式[abcd]的一致性和连贯性”(Revelle, 2007, p. 37)。但人格研究目前提供的更多是模式分类,而不是根本原因理论。精神疾病可以被视为涉及人格的极端,但通过症状模式而不是生物学原因来诊断。这种表面的分类描述对科学来说是必要的,但一致的预测性解释需要因果理论。人格结构,特别是其临床极端,应该预测ABCD模式的变化,简约需要最低的有效因果解释水平。但是,即使是受生物学启发的人格理论,目前也使用一种基于直觉语言的方法来进行规模开发,这种方法缺乏生物学依据。我认为,目的论的“目的”解释了保守的大脑情感系统的组织和输出,其中高激活在特定情况下是适应性的,但在其他情况下是不适应的。整个系统灵敏度的简单调制器之所以进化,是因为所需的自适应水平可以在人和时间之间变化。对调制器的敏感性是一种抽象的预测性人格因素,它在神经水平上起作用,但为ABCD变化中的一致性和偶尔的明显不一致性提供了因果解释。神经调节剂影响从元特征到各个方面的所有“人格层次”:稳定性似乎被血清素能药物改变,神经质被氯胺酮改变,特质焦虑被简单的抗焦虑药物改变。在这里,精神病学的工具转移到人格研究,并暗示两个层次之间的相互作用和倾斜的因素映射到ABCD。根据这种观点,许多精神病理学反映了神经层面人格因素的极端,我们可以将许多药物治疗视为暂时改变人格。所以,特别是对于与基本情绪及其障碍相关的人格因素,我认为我们应该从进化生物学开始,直接研究保守的神经水平调节剂来解释我们的解释性人格结构,只有在神经水平的解释失败时才调用更高层次的,紧急的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors?

Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors?

Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors?

Personality neuroscience and psychopathology: should we start with biology and look for neural-level factors?

"Personality is an abstraction used to explain consistency and coherency in an individual's pattern of affects, cognitions, desires and behaviors [ABCDs]" (Revelle, 2007, p. 37). But personality research currently provides more a taxonomy of patterns than theories of fundamental causes. Psychiatric disorders can be viewed as involving extremes of personality but are diagnosed via symptom patterns not biological causes. Such surface-level taxonomic description is necessary for science, but consistent predictive explanation requires causal theory. Personality constructs, and especially their clinical extremes, should predict variation in ABCD patterns, with parsimony requiring the lowest effective causal level of explanation. But, even biologically inspired personality theories currently use an intuitive language-based approach for scale development that lacks biological anchors. I argue that teleonomic "purpose" explains the organisation and outputs of conserved brain emotion systems, where high activation is adaptive in specific situations but is otherwise maladaptive. Simple modulators of whole-system sensitivity evolved because the requisite adaptive level can vary across people and time. Sensitivity to a modulator is an abstract predictive personality factor that operates at the neural level but provides a causal explanation of both coherence and occasional apparent incoherence in ABCD variation. Neuromodulators impact all levels of the "personality hierarchy" from metatraits to aspects: stability appears altered by serotonergic drugs, neuroticism by ketamine and trait anxiety by simple anxiolytic drugs. Here, the tools of psychiatry transfer to personality research and imply both interaction between levels and oblique factor mappings to ABCD. On this view, much psychopathology reflects extremes of neural-level personality factors, and we can view much pharmacotherapy as temporarily altering personality. So, particularly for personality factors linked to basic emotions and their disorders, I think we should start with evolutionary biology and look directly at conserved neural-level modulators for our explanatory personality constructs and only invoke higher order, emergent, explanations when neural-level explanation fails.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信