慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛反应性、功能能力测试和残疾水平

Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-06 DOI:10.1142/S101370252050002X
Prasert Sakulsriprasert, Roongtiwa Vachalathiti, Pathaimas Kingcha
{"title":"慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛反应性、功能能力测试和残疾水平","authors":"Prasert Sakulsriprasert,&nbsp;Roongtiwa Vachalathiti,&nbsp;Pathaimas Kingcha","doi":"10.1142/S101370252050002X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical outcomes are very important in clinical assessment, and responsiveness is a component inside the outcome measures that needs to be investigated, particularly in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability in individuals with CNSLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty subjects were assessed in pain using the following methods: visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), functional capacity tests: functional reach test (FRT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST), and two-minute step test (2 MST), and disability level: modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), Thai version before and after 2-week intervention session. For interventions, the subjects received education, spinal manipulative therapy, and individual therapeutic exercise twice a week, for a total of two weeks. The statistics analyzed were change scores, effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most responsive parameter for individuals with CNSLBP was pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928) and five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST) (SRM -0.846).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that NPRS pain and 5 TSST were responsive in individuals with CNSLBP at two weeks after the beginning of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S101370252050002X","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.\",\"authors\":\"Prasert Sakulsriprasert,&nbsp;Roongtiwa Vachalathiti,&nbsp;Pathaimas Kingcha\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S101370252050002X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical outcomes are very important in clinical assessment, and responsiveness is a component inside the outcome measures that needs to be investigated, particularly in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability in individuals with CNSLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty subjects were assessed in pain using the following methods: visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), functional capacity tests: functional reach test (FRT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST), and two-minute step test (2 MST), and disability level: modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), Thai version before and after 2-week intervention session. For interventions, the subjects received education, spinal manipulative therapy, and individual therapeutic exercise twice a week, for a total of two weeks. The statistics analyzed were change scores, effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most responsive parameter for individuals with CNSLBP was pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928) and five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST) (SRM -0.846).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that NPRS pain and 5 TSST were responsive in individuals with CNSLBP at two weeks after the beginning of interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S101370252050002X\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S101370252050002X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S101370252050002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:临床结果在临床评估中非常重要,反应性是需要调查的结果测量中的一个组成部分,特别是在慢性非特异性腰痛(CNSLBP)中。目的:本研究旨在探讨CNSLBP患者的疼痛反应性、功能能力测试和残疾。方法:采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)对20名受试者进行疼痛评估,功能能力测试:功能到达测试(FRT)、5次坐立测试(5次TSST)和2分钟步数测试(2分钟步数测试),残疾水平:改良Oswestry残疾问卷(MODQ),泰国版干预前后。在干预方面,受试者接受教育、脊柱推拿治疗和个人治疗性运动,每周两次,共两周。统计分析为改变评分、效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)。结果:CNSLBP患者最具反应性的参数为疼痛,测量方法为数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928)和5次坐立测试(5 TSST) (SRM -0.846)。结论:本研究发现,在干预开始后两周,NPRS疼痛和5 - TSST对CNSLBP患者有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

分享
查看原文
Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Background: Clinical outcomes are very important in clinical assessment, and responsiveness is a component inside the outcome measures that needs to be investigated, particularly in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability in individuals with CNSLBP.

Methods: Twenty subjects were assessed in pain using the following methods: visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), functional capacity tests: functional reach test (FRT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST), and two-minute step test (2 MST), and disability level: modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), Thai version before and after 2-week intervention session. For interventions, the subjects received education, spinal manipulative therapy, and individual therapeutic exercise twice a week, for a total of two weeks. The statistics analyzed were change scores, effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM).

Results: The most responsive parameter for individuals with CNSLBP was pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928) and five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST) (SRM -0.846).

Conclusion: This study found that NPRS pain and 5 TSST were responsive in individuals with CNSLBP at two weeks after the beginning of interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信