自评杏仁核活动:情感痛苦的自生物学指标。

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-06-13 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2019.1
Katherine E MacDuffie, Annchen R Knodt, Spenser R Radtke, Timothy J Strauman, Ahmad R Hariri
{"title":"自评杏仁核活动:情感痛苦的自生物学指标。","authors":"Katherine E MacDuffie,&nbsp;Annchen R Knodt,&nbsp;Spenser R Radtke,&nbsp;Timothy J Strauman,&nbsp;Ahmad R Hariri","doi":"10.1017/pen.2019.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Auto-biological beliefs-beliefs about one's own biology-are an understudied component of personal identity. Research participants who are led to believe they are biologically vulnerable to affective disorders report more symptoms and less ability to control their mood; however, little is known about the impact of self-originating beliefs about risk for psychopathology, and whether such beliefs correspond to empirically derived estimates of actual vulnerability. Participants in a neuroimaging study (<i>n</i> = 1256) completed self-report measures of affective symptoms, perceived stress, and neuroticism, and an emotional face processing task in the scanner designed to elicit threat responses from the amygdala. A subsample (<i>n</i> = 63) additionally rated their own perceived neural response to threat (i.e., amygdala activity) compared to peers. Self-ratings of neural threat response were uncorrelated with actual threat-related amygdala activity measured via BOLD fMRI. However, self-ratings predicted subjective distress across a variety of self-report measures. In contrast, in the full sample, threat-related amygdala activity was uncorrelated with self-report measures of affective distress. These findings suggest that beliefs about one's own biological threat response-while unrelated to measured neural activation-may be informative indicators of psychological functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"2 ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2019.1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-rated amygdala activity: an auto-biological index of affective distress.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E MacDuffie,&nbsp;Annchen R Knodt,&nbsp;Spenser R Radtke,&nbsp;Timothy J Strauman,&nbsp;Ahmad R Hariri\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pen.2019.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Auto-biological beliefs-beliefs about one's own biology-are an understudied component of personal identity. Research participants who are led to believe they are biologically vulnerable to affective disorders report more symptoms and less ability to control their mood; however, little is known about the impact of self-originating beliefs about risk for psychopathology, and whether such beliefs correspond to empirically derived estimates of actual vulnerability. Participants in a neuroimaging study (<i>n</i> = 1256) completed self-report measures of affective symptoms, perceived stress, and neuroticism, and an emotional face processing task in the scanner designed to elicit threat responses from the amygdala. A subsample (<i>n</i> = 63) additionally rated their own perceived neural response to threat (i.e., amygdala activity) compared to peers. Self-ratings of neural threat response were uncorrelated with actual threat-related amygdala activity measured via BOLD fMRI. However, self-ratings predicted subjective distress across a variety of self-report measures. In contrast, in the full sample, threat-related amygdala activity was uncorrelated with self-report measures of affective distress. These findings suggest that beliefs about one's own biological threat response-while unrelated to measured neural activation-may be informative indicators of psychological functioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2019.1\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

自我生物学信念——关于一个人自身生物学的信念——是个人同一性的一个未被充分研究的组成部分。那些被引导相信自己在生理上容易受到情感障碍影响的研究参与者报告了更多的症状和更低的控制情绪的能力;然而,关于自我产生的关于精神病理风险的信念的影响,以及这些信念是否符合经验得出的对实际脆弱性的估计,我们知之甚少。在一项神经成像研究中,参与者(n = 1256)在扫描仪中完成了情感症状、感知压力和神经质的自我报告测量,并完成了一项情绪面部处理任务,该任务旨在引起杏仁核的威胁反应。一个子样本(n = 63)与同龄人相比,还评估了他们自己对威胁的感知神经反应(即杏仁核活动)。神经威胁反应的自我评价与通过BOLD功能磁共振成像测量的实际威胁相关杏仁核活动不相关。然而,通过各种自我报告测量,自我评分预测了主观痛苦。相反,在整个样本中,与威胁相关的杏仁核活动与情感痛苦的自我报告测量无关。这些发现表明,对自己的生物威胁反应的信念——尽管与测量的神经激活无关——可能是心理功能的信息指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Self-rated amygdala activity: an auto-biological index of affective distress.

Self-rated amygdala activity: an auto-biological index of affective distress.

Self-rated amygdala activity: an auto-biological index of affective distress.

Self-rated amygdala activity: an auto-biological index of affective distress.

Auto-biological beliefs-beliefs about one's own biology-are an understudied component of personal identity. Research participants who are led to believe they are biologically vulnerable to affective disorders report more symptoms and less ability to control their mood; however, little is known about the impact of self-originating beliefs about risk for psychopathology, and whether such beliefs correspond to empirically derived estimates of actual vulnerability. Participants in a neuroimaging study (n = 1256) completed self-report measures of affective symptoms, perceived stress, and neuroticism, and an emotional face processing task in the scanner designed to elicit threat responses from the amygdala. A subsample (n = 63) additionally rated their own perceived neural response to threat (i.e., amygdala activity) compared to peers. Self-ratings of neural threat response were uncorrelated with actual threat-related amygdala activity measured via BOLD fMRI. However, self-ratings predicted subjective distress across a variety of self-report measures. In contrast, in the full sample, threat-related amygdala activity was uncorrelated with self-report measures of affective distress. These findings suggest that beliefs about one's own biological threat response-while unrelated to measured neural activation-may be informative indicators of psychological functioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信