行为抑制系统功能障碍会导致注意缺陷多动障碍吗?

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2019-08-08 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2019.5
S Sadeghi, J McIntosh, S M Shadli, D Healey, R Rostami, P Trani, N McNaughton
{"title":"行为抑制系统功能障碍会导致注意缺陷多动障碍吗?","authors":"S Sadeghi,&nbsp;J McIntosh,&nbsp;S M Shadli,&nbsp;D Healey,&nbsp;R Rostami,&nbsp;P Trani,&nbsp;N McNaughton","doi":"10.1017/pen.2019.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality has as its main foundation a Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS), defined by anxiolytic drugs, in which high trait sensitivity should lead to internalising, anxiety, disorders. Conversely, it has been suggested that low BIS sensitivity would be a characteristic of externalising disorders. BIS output should lead to increased arousal and attention as well as behavioural inhibition. Here, therefore, we tested whether an externalising disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), involves low BIS sensitivity. Goal-Conflict-Specific Rhythmicity (GCSR) in an auditory Stop Signal Task is a right frontal EEG biomarker of BIS function. We assessed children diagnosed with ADHD-I (inattentive) or ADHD-C (combined) and healthy control groups for GCSR in: a) an initial smaller study in Dunedin, New Zealand (population ~120,000: 15 control, 10 ADHD-I, 10 ADHD-C); and b) a main larger one in Tehran, Iran (population ~9 [city]-16 [metropolis] million: 27 control, 18 ADHD-I, 21 ADHD-C). GCSR was clear in controls (particularly at 6-7 Hz) and in ADHD-C (particularly at 8-9 Hz) but was reduced in ADHD-I. Reduced attention and arousal in ADHD-I could be due, in part, to BIS dysfunction. However, hyperactivity and impulsivity in ADHD-C are unlikely to reflect reduced BIS activity. Increased GCSR frequency in ADHD-C may be due to increased input to the BIS. BIS dysfunction may contribute to some aspects of ADHD (and potentially other externalising disorders) and to some differences between the ADHD subtypes but other prefrontal systems (and, e.g. dopamine) are also important.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"2 ","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2019.5","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does behavioural inhibition system dysfunction contribute to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?\",\"authors\":\"S Sadeghi,&nbsp;J McIntosh,&nbsp;S M Shadli,&nbsp;D Healey,&nbsp;R Rostami,&nbsp;P Trani,&nbsp;N McNaughton\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pen.2019.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality has as its main foundation a Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS), defined by anxiolytic drugs, in which high trait sensitivity should lead to internalising, anxiety, disorders. Conversely, it has been suggested that low BIS sensitivity would be a characteristic of externalising disorders. BIS output should lead to increased arousal and attention as well as behavioural inhibition. Here, therefore, we tested whether an externalising disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), involves low BIS sensitivity. Goal-Conflict-Specific Rhythmicity (GCSR) in an auditory Stop Signal Task is a right frontal EEG biomarker of BIS function. We assessed children diagnosed with ADHD-I (inattentive) or ADHD-C (combined) and healthy control groups for GCSR in: a) an initial smaller study in Dunedin, New Zealand (population ~120,000: 15 control, 10 ADHD-I, 10 ADHD-C); and b) a main larger one in Tehran, Iran (population ~9 [city]-16 [metropolis] million: 27 control, 18 ADHD-I, 21 ADHD-C). GCSR was clear in controls (particularly at 6-7 Hz) and in ADHD-C (particularly at 8-9 Hz) but was reduced in ADHD-I. Reduced attention and arousal in ADHD-I could be due, in part, to BIS dysfunction. However, hyperactivity and impulsivity in ADHD-C are unlikely to reflect reduced BIS activity. Increased GCSR frequency in ADHD-C may be due to increased input to the BIS. BIS dysfunction may contribute to some aspects of ADHD (and potentially other externalising disorders) and to some differences between the ADHD subtypes but other prefrontal systems (and, e.g. dopamine) are also important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"e5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2019.5\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

人格强化敏感性理论的主要基础是行为抑制系统(BIS),由抗焦虑药物定义,其中高特质敏感性应导致内化,焦虑,障碍。相反,有人认为低BIS敏感性可能是外化障碍的一个特征。BIS输出应导致觉醒和注意力增加以及行为抑制。因此,在这里,我们测试了一种外化障碍,即注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是否与低BIS敏感性有关。听觉停止信号任务中的目标冲突特异性节律性(GCSR)是BIS功能的右侧额叶EEG生物标志物。我们评估了诊断为ADHD-I(注意力不集中)或ADHD-C(合并)的儿童和健康对照组的GCSR: a)在新西兰达尼丁进行的一项初步小型研究(人口约120,000:15名对照组,10名ADHD-I, 10名ADHD-C);b)主要在伊朗德黑兰(人口~9[城市]-16[大都市]百万:对照组27人,ADHD-I 18人,ADHD-C 21人)。GCSR在对照组(特别是6-7 Hz)和ADHD-C(特别是8-9 Hz)中明显,但在ADHD-I中减少。ADHD-I的注意力和觉醒减少可能部分归因于BIS功能障碍。然而,ADHD-C的多动和冲动不太可能反映BIS活动的减少。ADHD-C中GCSR频率增加可能是由于BIS输入增加所致。BIS功能障碍可能导致ADHD的某些方面(以及潜在的其他外化障碍)和ADHD亚型之间的一些差异,但其他前额叶系统(例如多巴胺)也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does behavioural inhibition system dysfunction contribute to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

Does behavioural inhibition system dysfunction contribute to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

Does behavioural inhibition system dysfunction contribute to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

Does behavioural inhibition system dysfunction contribute to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality has as its main foundation a Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS), defined by anxiolytic drugs, in which high trait sensitivity should lead to internalising, anxiety, disorders. Conversely, it has been suggested that low BIS sensitivity would be a characteristic of externalising disorders. BIS output should lead to increased arousal and attention as well as behavioural inhibition. Here, therefore, we tested whether an externalising disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), involves low BIS sensitivity. Goal-Conflict-Specific Rhythmicity (GCSR) in an auditory Stop Signal Task is a right frontal EEG biomarker of BIS function. We assessed children diagnosed with ADHD-I (inattentive) or ADHD-C (combined) and healthy control groups for GCSR in: a) an initial smaller study in Dunedin, New Zealand (population ~120,000: 15 control, 10 ADHD-I, 10 ADHD-C); and b) a main larger one in Tehran, Iran (population ~9 [city]-16 [metropolis] million: 27 control, 18 ADHD-I, 21 ADHD-C). GCSR was clear in controls (particularly at 6-7 Hz) and in ADHD-C (particularly at 8-9 Hz) but was reduced in ADHD-I. Reduced attention and arousal in ADHD-I could be due, in part, to BIS dysfunction. However, hyperactivity and impulsivity in ADHD-C are unlikely to reflect reduced BIS activity. Increased GCSR frequency in ADHD-C may be due to increased input to the BIS. BIS dysfunction may contribute to some aspects of ADHD (and potentially other externalising disorders) and to some differences between the ADHD subtypes but other prefrontal systems (and, e.g. dopamine) are also important.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信