体外冲击波心肌血运重建术对难治性心绞痛患者缺血负担的影响:单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究。

Q3 Medicine
Minerva cardioangiologica Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-21 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05110-5
Gianluca Alunni, Salvatore D'''''Amico, Chiara Castelli, Giulia De Lio, Francesco Fioravanti, Guglielmo Gallone, Sebastiano Marra, Gaetano M De Ferrari
{"title":"体外冲击波心肌血运重建术对难治性心绞痛患者缺血负担的影响:单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究。","authors":"Gianluca Alunni,&nbsp;Salvatore D'''''Amico,&nbsp;Chiara Castelli,&nbsp;Giulia De Lio,&nbsp;Francesco Fioravanti,&nbsp;Guglielmo Gallone,&nbsp;Sebastiano Marra,&nbsp;Gaetano M De Ferrari","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05110-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) is a non-invasive treatment designed to improve symptoms in refractory angina (RA) patients. Enhanced perfusion through local vasodilation and neo-capillarization is postulated to be the mechanism of the observed clinical benefit. However, the impact of ESMR on the ischemic burden of RA patients has not been adequately assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred twenty-one consecutive RA patients suitable for ESMR were treated. Twenty-nine RA patients not suitable for treatment were clinically followed-up as a control group for clinical endpoints. ESMR-treated patients underwent baseline and 6-month single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to evaluate the changes in ischemic burden. The operator was blinded to the pre/post-treatment status of the SPECT exam. The primary endpoint was the difference in summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) between follow-up and baseline SPECTs. Secondary endpoints included the changes in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class and nitroglycerin use between 6-month follow-up and baseline. Clinical endpoints were further compared between ESMR-treated patients and the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following ESMR, a significant reduction in the ischemic burden was observed (follow-up SSS: 14.2±10 vs. baseline SSS: 21.2±9.42, P<0.0001; follow-up SDS: 4.6±5.9 vs. baseline SDS 10.2±7.9, P<0.0001) including less patients with moderate to severe ischemia (19% vs. 46% P<0.0001). CCS class and nitroglycerin use were significantly reduced (CCS: 1.5±0.6 vs. 2.7±0.6, P<0.0001; patients needing nitroglycerin: 24% vs. 64%, P<0.0001). When compared to the control group, CCS class reduction, nitroglycerin use and hospitalizations were significantly lower for ESMR treated vs. non-treated RA patients at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center cohort of RA patients undergoing ESMR treatment and serial myocardial perfusion imaging, ESMR was associated with a significant reduction in the ischemic burden. These findings provide a physiological rationale and mechanism for the observed clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":" ","pages":"567-576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization on the ischemic burden of refractory angina patients: a single photon emission computed tomography study.\",\"authors\":\"Gianluca Alunni,&nbsp;Salvatore D'''''Amico,&nbsp;Chiara Castelli,&nbsp;Giulia De Lio,&nbsp;Francesco Fioravanti,&nbsp;Guglielmo Gallone,&nbsp;Sebastiano Marra,&nbsp;Gaetano M De Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05110-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) is a non-invasive treatment designed to improve symptoms in refractory angina (RA) patients. Enhanced perfusion through local vasodilation and neo-capillarization is postulated to be the mechanism of the observed clinical benefit. However, the impact of ESMR on the ischemic burden of RA patients has not been adequately assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred twenty-one consecutive RA patients suitable for ESMR were treated. Twenty-nine RA patients not suitable for treatment were clinically followed-up as a control group for clinical endpoints. ESMR-treated patients underwent baseline and 6-month single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to evaluate the changes in ischemic burden. The operator was blinded to the pre/post-treatment status of the SPECT exam. The primary endpoint was the difference in summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) between follow-up and baseline SPECTs. Secondary endpoints included the changes in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class and nitroglycerin use between 6-month follow-up and baseline. Clinical endpoints were further compared between ESMR-treated patients and the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following ESMR, a significant reduction in the ischemic burden was observed (follow-up SSS: 14.2±10 vs. baseline SSS: 21.2±9.42, P<0.0001; follow-up SDS: 4.6±5.9 vs. baseline SDS 10.2±7.9, P<0.0001) including less patients with moderate to severe ischemia (19% vs. 46% P<0.0001). CCS class and nitroglycerin use were significantly reduced (CCS: 1.5±0.6 vs. 2.7±0.6, P<0.0001; patients needing nitroglycerin: 24% vs. 64%, P<0.0001). When compared to the control group, CCS class reduction, nitroglycerin use and hospitalizations were significantly lower for ESMR treated vs. non-treated RA patients at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center cohort of RA patients undergoing ESMR treatment and serial myocardial perfusion imaging, ESMR was associated with a significant reduction in the ischemic burden. These findings provide a physiological rationale and mechanism for the observed clinical benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"567-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05110-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05110-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:体外冲击波心肌血运重建术(ESMR)是一种非侵入性治疗,旨在改善难治性心绞痛(RA)患者的症状。通过局部血管扩张和新毛细血管形成来增强灌注被认为是观察到的临床获益的机制。然而,ESMR对RA患者缺血性负担的影响尚未得到充分评估。方法:连续121例适合ESMR治疗的RA患者。对29例不适合治疗的RA患者进行临床随访,作为临床终点的对照组。esmr治疗的患者接受基线和6个月的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)来评估缺血负荷的变化。操作者对SPECT检查的治疗前/治疗后状态不知情。主要终点是随访和基线spect的总压力评分(SSS)和总差异评分(SDS)的差异。次要终点包括加拿大心血管学会(CCS)心绞痛分级和硝酸甘油使用在6个月随访和基线之间的变化。进一步比较esmr治疗组和对照组的临床终点。结果:ESMR后,观察到缺血性负担显著减轻(随访SSS: 14.2±10 vs基线SSS: 21.2±9.42)。结论:在接受ESMR治疗和连续心肌灌注成像的RA患者的单中心队列中,ESMR与缺血性负担显著减轻相关。这些发现为观察到的临床益处提供了生理基础和机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization on the ischemic burden of refractory angina patients: a single photon emission computed tomography study.

Background: Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) is a non-invasive treatment designed to improve symptoms in refractory angina (RA) patients. Enhanced perfusion through local vasodilation and neo-capillarization is postulated to be the mechanism of the observed clinical benefit. However, the impact of ESMR on the ischemic burden of RA patients has not been adequately assessed.

Methods: One-hundred twenty-one consecutive RA patients suitable for ESMR were treated. Twenty-nine RA patients not suitable for treatment were clinically followed-up as a control group for clinical endpoints. ESMR-treated patients underwent baseline and 6-month single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to evaluate the changes in ischemic burden. The operator was blinded to the pre/post-treatment status of the SPECT exam. The primary endpoint was the difference in summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) between follow-up and baseline SPECTs. Secondary endpoints included the changes in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class and nitroglycerin use between 6-month follow-up and baseline. Clinical endpoints were further compared between ESMR-treated patients and the control group.

Results: Following ESMR, a significant reduction in the ischemic burden was observed (follow-up SSS: 14.2±10 vs. baseline SSS: 21.2±9.42, P<0.0001; follow-up SDS: 4.6±5.9 vs. baseline SDS 10.2±7.9, P<0.0001) including less patients with moderate to severe ischemia (19% vs. 46% P<0.0001). CCS class and nitroglycerin use were significantly reduced (CCS: 1.5±0.6 vs. 2.7±0.6, P<0.0001; patients needing nitroglycerin: 24% vs. 64%, P<0.0001). When compared to the control group, CCS class reduction, nitroglycerin use and hospitalizations were significantly lower for ESMR treated vs. non-treated RA patients at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: In this single-center cohort of RA patients undergoing ESMR treatment and serial myocardial perfusion imaging, ESMR was associated with a significant reduction in the ischemic burden. These findings provide a physiological rationale and mechanism for the observed clinical benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardioangiologica
Minerva cardioangiologica CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信