内感受性训练对决策、焦虑和躯体症状的影响。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
BioPsychoSocial Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-17 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7
Ayako Sugawara, Yuri Terasawa, Ruri Katsunuma, Atsushi Sekiguchi
{"title":"内感受性训练对决策、焦虑和躯体症状的影响。","authors":"Ayako Sugawara,&nbsp;Yuri Terasawa,&nbsp;Ruri Katsunuma,&nbsp;Atsushi Sekiguchi","doi":"10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interoception is the perception of afferent information that arises from any point within the body. Individual differences in interoception have been associated with affective processing and decision-making processing. The somatic marker hypothesis summarizes the potential effects of interoception on decision-making processes. According to this theory, individuals with interoceptive dysfunction exhibit disadvantageous decision making. Recently, enhancement of interoceptive accuracy, an element of interoception assessed by objective decision-making tasks, has been demonstrated using biofeedback. Garfinkle et al. developed an interoceptive training task, modified from the heartbeat perception task, which enhanced interoceptive accuracy and reduced anxiety symptoms. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of interoceptive training on decision-making processes. Based on improvements in interoceptive accuracy, we hypothesized that decision-making scores would change in a manner indicative of increased rationality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal interventional study was performed with interoceptive training. Before and after the intervention, interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision-making processes were assessed using a heartbeat perception task and rational decision-making tasks, respectively. Fourteen healthy volunteers (nine women; mean age, 21.9 ± 4.5 years) participated. The analysis included data from 12 participants. To detect individual differences in the effects of interoceptive accuracy on rationality of decision making, correlation analysis was conducted on change ratios of the indices of interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interoceptive training resulted in significant enhancement of interoceptive accuracy scores and significant reductions in somatic symptom and state anxiety scores. In contrast, interoceptive training did not cause significant changes in decision-making indices. There was a significant positive correlation between change ratios of indices of interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggested a causal relation between interoception and rationality of decision making. These findings will enhance the understanding of mechanisms underlying alterations of decision-making related to psychotherapy by focusing on interoception.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registration number: UMIN000037548.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Sugawara,&nbsp;Yuri Terasawa,&nbsp;Ruri Katsunuma,&nbsp;Atsushi Sekiguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interoception is the perception of afferent information that arises from any point within the body. Individual differences in interoception have been associated with affective processing and decision-making processing. The somatic marker hypothesis summarizes the potential effects of interoception on decision-making processes. According to this theory, individuals with interoceptive dysfunction exhibit disadvantageous decision making. Recently, enhancement of interoceptive accuracy, an element of interoception assessed by objective decision-making tasks, has been demonstrated using biofeedback. Garfinkle et al. developed an interoceptive training task, modified from the heartbeat perception task, which enhanced interoceptive accuracy and reduced anxiety symptoms. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of interoceptive training on decision-making processes. Based on improvements in interoceptive accuracy, we hypothesized that decision-making scores would change in a manner indicative of increased rationality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal interventional study was performed with interoceptive training. Before and after the intervention, interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision-making processes were assessed using a heartbeat perception task and rational decision-making tasks, respectively. Fourteen healthy volunteers (nine women; mean age, 21.9 ± 4.5 years) participated. The analysis included data from 12 participants. To detect individual differences in the effects of interoceptive accuracy on rationality of decision making, correlation analysis was conducted on change ratios of the indices of interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interoceptive training resulted in significant enhancement of interoceptive accuracy scores and significant reductions in somatic symptom and state anxiety scores. In contrast, interoceptive training did not cause significant changes in decision-making indices. There was a significant positive correlation between change ratios of indices of interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggested a causal relation between interoception and rationality of decision making. These findings will enhance the understanding of mechanisms underlying alterations of decision-making related to psychotherapy by focusing on interoception.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial registration number: UMIN000037548.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioPsychoSocial Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioPsychoSocial Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-020-00179-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

背景:内感受是对来自身体任何一点的传入信息的感知。内感受的个体差异与情感加工和决策加工有关。躯体标记假说总结了内感受对决策过程的潜在影响。根据这一理论,具有内感受功能障碍的个体表现出不利的决策。最近,利用生物反馈证明了内感受准确性的增强,这是客观决策任务评估的内感受的一个要素。Garfinkle等人在心跳感知任务的基础上开发了一种内感受训练任务,提高了内感受的准确性,减少了焦虑症状。本研究的目的是确定内感受性训练对决策过程的影响。基于内感受准确性的提高,我们假设决策得分会以一种表明理性增加的方式发生变化。方法:采用内感受性训练进行纵向介入研究。干预前后分别采用心跳感知任务和理性决策任务评估决策过程的内感受准确性和合理性。14名健康志愿者(9名女性;平均年龄(21.9±4.5岁)。该分析包括来自12名参与者的数据。为了检验内感受准确性对决策合理性影响的个体差异,我们对内感受准确性和决策合理性指标的变化率进行了相关分析。结果:内感受训练显著提高了内感受准确性评分,显著降低了躯体症状和状态焦虑评分。而内感受性训练对决策指标的影响不显著。内感受准确性各指标的变化率与决策合理性呈显著正相关。结论:内感受与决策合理性之间存在因果关系。这些发现将通过关注内感受来加强对心理治疗相关决策改变机制的理解。试验注册:试验注册号:UMIN000037548。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.

Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.

Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.

Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.

Background: Interoception is the perception of afferent information that arises from any point within the body. Individual differences in interoception have been associated with affective processing and decision-making processing. The somatic marker hypothesis summarizes the potential effects of interoception on decision-making processes. According to this theory, individuals with interoceptive dysfunction exhibit disadvantageous decision making. Recently, enhancement of interoceptive accuracy, an element of interoception assessed by objective decision-making tasks, has been demonstrated using biofeedback. Garfinkle et al. developed an interoceptive training task, modified from the heartbeat perception task, which enhanced interoceptive accuracy and reduced anxiety symptoms. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of interoceptive training on decision-making processes. Based on improvements in interoceptive accuracy, we hypothesized that decision-making scores would change in a manner indicative of increased rationality.

Methods: This longitudinal interventional study was performed with interoceptive training. Before and after the intervention, interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision-making processes were assessed using a heartbeat perception task and rational decision-making tasks, respectively. Fourteen healthy volunteers (nine women; mean age, 21.9 ± 4.5 years) participated. The analysis included data from 12 participants. To detect individual differences in the effects of interoceptive accuracy on rationality of decision making, correlation analysis was conducted on change ratios of the indices of interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision making.

Results: Interoceptive training resulted in significant enhancement of interoceptive accuracy scores and significant reductions in somatic symptom and state anxiety scores. In contrast, interoceptive training did not cause significant changes in decision-making indices. There was a significant positive correlation between change ratios of indices of interoceptive accuracy and rationality of decision making.

Conclusions: The results suggested a causal relation between interoception and rationality of decision making. These findings will enhance the understanding of mechanisms underlying alterations of decision-making related to psychotherapy by focusing on interoception.

Trial registration: Trial registration number: UMIN000037548.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信